Abstract
We present a method for organizing a heterogeneous collection of 3D shapes for overview and exploration. Instead of relying on quantitative distances, which may become unreliable between dissimilar shapes, we introduce a qualitative analysis which utilizes multiple distance measures but only in cases where the measures can be reliably compared. Our analysis is based on the notion of quartets, each defined by two pairs of shapes, where the shapes in each pair are close to each other, but far apart from the shapes in the other pair. Combining the information from many quartets computed across a shape collection using several distance measures, we create a hierarchical structure we call categorization tree of the shape collection. This tree satisfies the topological (qualitative) constraints imposed by the quartets creating an effective organization of the shapes. We present categorization trees computed on various collections of shapes and compare them to ground truth data from human categorization. We further introduce the concept of degree of separation chart for every shape in the collection and show the effectiveness of using it for interactive shapes exploration.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental material.
- Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Kimmel, R., Mahmoudi, M., and Sapiro, G. 2010. A gromov-hausdorff framework with diffusion geometry for topologically-robust non-rigid shape matching. Int. J. Comput. Vision 89, 2-3, 266--286. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Guibas, L. J., and Ovsjanikov, M. 2011. Shape google: Geometric words and expressions for invariant shape retrieval. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 1, 1:1--1:20. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Chen, D.-Y., Tian, X.-P., Shen, Y.-T., and Ouhyoung, M. 2003. On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. Comput. Graph. Forum 22, 3, 223--232.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dueck, D., and Frey, B. J. 2007. Non-metric affinity propagation for unsupervised image categorization. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Dumais, S., and Chen, H. 2000. Hierarchical classification of web content. In Proc. of ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 256--263. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Erdos, P. L., Steel, M. A., Szekely, L. A., and Warnow, T. J. 1997. A few logs suffice to build (almost) all trees (ii). Tech. rep. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., and Stahl, D. 2011. Cluster analysis, 5th edition. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.Google Scholar
- Frey, B. J., and Dueck, D. 2007. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972--976.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Gal, R., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. 2007. Pose-oblivious shape signature. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 2, 261--271. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Golovinskiy, A., and Funkhouser, T. 2009. Consistent segmentation of 3D models. Comput. Graph. 33, 3, 262--269. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2003. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3d shape descriptors. In SGP'03, 156--164. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2003. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3d shape descriptors. In Proceedings of the 2003 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, SGP '03, 156--164. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kim, V. G., Li, W., Mitra, N. J., DiVerdi, S., and Funkhouser, T. 2012. Exploring collections of 3D models using fuzzy correspondences. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4, 54:1--54:11. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kohonen, T. 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics 43, 59--69.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ling, H., and Jacobs, D. W. 2007. Shape classification using the inner-distance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 2, 286--299. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., and Bibby, J. M. 1980. Multivariate Analysis (Probability And Mathematical Statistics) Author:, Publisher. Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., and Dobkin, D. 2002. Shape distributions. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 4, 807--832. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ovsjanikov, M., Li, W., Guibas, L., and Mitra, N. J. 2011. Exploration of continuous variability in collections of 3D shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 33:1--33:10. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ranwez, V., and Gascuel, O. 2001. Quartet-based phylogenetic inference: Improvements and limits. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18, 6, 1103--1116.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Semple, C., and Steel, M. 2003. Phylogenetics. Oxford Univerity Press.Google Scholar
- Shapira, L., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. 2008. Consistent mesh partitioning and skeletonisation using the shape diameter function. Vis. Comput. 24, 4, 249--259. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Shilane, P., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., and Funkhouser, T. 2004. The princeton shape benchmark. In SMI'04, 167--178. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sidi, O., van Kaick, O., Kleiman, Y., Zhang, H., and Cohen-Or, D. 2011. Unsupervised co-segmentation of a set of shapes via descriptor-space spectral clustering. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 6, 126:1--126:10. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Snir, S., and Rao, S. 2010. Quartets maxcut: A divide and conquer quartets algorithm. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinformatics 7, 4, 704--718. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Strimmer, K., Goldman, N., and von Haeseler, A. 1997. Bayesian probabilites and quartet puzzling. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 14, 2, 210--211.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Tangelder, J. W., and Veltkamp, R. C. 2008. A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. Multimedia Tools Appl. 39, 3, 441--471. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wang, Y., Asafi, S., van Kaick, O., Zhang, H., Cohen-Or, D., and Chen, B. 2012. Active co-analysis of a set of shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 6 (Nov.), 165:1--165:10. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Weigend, A. S., Wiener, E. D., and Pedersen, J. O. 1999. Exploiting hierarchy in text categorization. Information Retrieval 1, 3 (Oct.), 193--216. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Willson, S. J. 1998. Building phylogenetic trees from quartets by using local inconsistency measures. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 5, 685--693.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Xu, K., Li, H., Zhang, H., Cohen-Or, D., Xiong, Y., and Cheng, Z.-Q. 2010. Style-content separation by anisotropic part scales. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 6 (Dec.), 184:1--184:10. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Qualitative organization of collections of shapes via quartet analysis
Recommendations
Meta-representation of shape families
We introduce a meta-representation that represents the essence of a family of shapes. The meta-representation learns the configurations of shape parts that are common across the family, and encapsulates this knowledge with a system of geometric ...
Relation-based parametrization and exploration of shape collections
We present a parametrization of shape collections based on relations between parts.The way in which the shapes vary is captured automatically.Exploration allows intuitive browsing or searching for more specific shapes.A visualization aids the user in ...
Exploration of continuous variability in collections of 3D shapes
SIGGRAPH '11: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papersAs large public repositories of 3D shapes continue to grow, the amount of shape variability in such collections also increases, both in terms of the number of different classes of shapes, as well as the geometric variability of shapes within each class. ...





Comments