skip to main content
research-article

Designing unreinforced masonry models

Published:21 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present a complete design pipeline that allows non-expert users to design and analyze masonry structures without any structural knowledge. We optimize the force layouts both geometrically and topologically, finding a self-supported structure that is as close as possible to a given target surface. The generated structures are tessellated into hexagonal blocks with a pattern that prevents sliding failure. The models can be used in physically plausible virtual environments or 3D printed and assembled without reinforcements.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp065.mp4

References

  1. Bhooshan, S., and El Sayed, M. 2011. Use of subdivision surfaces in architectural form-finding and procedural modelling. In Proc. Symp. Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Block, P., and Lachauer, L. 2012. Three-dimensional equilibrium analysis of gothic masonry vaults. In Proc. VIII Int. Conference on Structural Analysis of Historic Construction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, P. 2009. Thrust Network Analysis: Exploring Three-dimensional Equilibrium. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bommes, D., Zimmer, H., and Kobbelt, L. 2009. Mixed-integer quadrangulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3, 77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Borgart, A. 2005. The relationship of form and force in (irregular) curved surfaces. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computation of Shell and Spatial Structures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouaziz, S., Deuss, M., Schwartzburg, Y., Weise, T., and Pauly, M. 2012. Shape-up: Shaping discrete geometry with projections. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 5, 1657--1667. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Calladine, C. R. 1983. Theory of Shell Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cazals, F., and Pouget, M. 2003. Estimating differential quantities using polynomial fitting of osculating jets. In Proc. SGP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Crane, K., Desbrun, M., and Schröder, P. 2010. Trivial connections on discrete surfaces. Comput. Graph. Forum 29, 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Eigensatz, M., Kilian, M., Schiftner, A., Mitra, N. J., Pottmann, H., and Pauly, M. 2010. Paneling architectural freeform surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fraternali, F. 2010. A thrust network approach to the equilibrium problem of unreinforced masonry vaults via polyhedral stress functions. Mechanics Research Communications 37, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fu, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., He, Y., and Cohen-Or, D. 2010. K-set tilable surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heyman, J. 1995. The Stone Skeleton: Structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hildebrandt, K., Polthier, K., and Wardetzky, M. 2005. Smooth feature lines on surface meshes. In Proc. SGP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kilian, A., and Ochsendorf, J. 2005. Particle-spring systems for structural form finding. J. IASS 148, 77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, Y., Pottmann, H., Wallner, J., Yang, Y.-L., and Wang, W. 2006. Geometric modeling with conical meshes and developable surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 681--689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mark, R. 1982. Experiments in Gothic structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. O'Dwyer, D. W. 1999. Funicular analysis of masonry vaults. Computers and Structures 73, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Panozzo, D., Lipman, Y., Puppo, E., and Zorin, D. 2012. Fields on symmetric surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ray, N., Vallet, B., Li, W., and Lévy, B. 2008. N-Symmetry Direction Field Design. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rippmann, M., and Block, P. 2013. Rethinking structural masonry: unreinforced, stone-cut shells. In Proc. ICE - Construction Materials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rippmann, M., Lachauer, L., and Block, P. 2012. Interactive vault design. International Journal of Space Structures 27, 4, 219--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Schiftner, A., and Balzer, J. 2010. Statics-sensitive layout of planar quadrilateral meshes. In Proc. Advances in Architectural Geometry, 221--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shewchuk, J. R. 1996. Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator. In Applied Computational Geometry: Towards Geometric Engineering, vol. 1148 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 203--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Singh, M., and Schaefer, S. 2010. Triangle surfaces with discrete equivalence classes. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Van Mele, T., McInerney, J., DeJong, M., and Block, P. 2012. Physical and computational discrete modeling of masonry vault collapse. In Proc. Int. Conf. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Vouga, E., Höbinger, M., Wallner, J., and Pottmann, H. 2012. Design of self-supporting surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2009. Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 112:1--112:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Whiting, E., Shin, H., Wang, R., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2012. Structural optimization of 3D masonry buildings. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 6, 159:1--159:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Williams, C. J. K. 1990. The generation of a class of structural forms for vaults and sails. The Structural Engineer 68, 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zessin, J., Lau, W., and Ochsendorf, J. 2010. Equilibrium of cracked masonry domes. Proc. ICE-Engineering and Computational Mechanics 163, 3, 135--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zimmer, H., Campen, M., Bommes, D., and Kobbelt, L. 2012. Rationalization of triangle-based point-folding structures. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 2, 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing unreinforced masonry models

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
          ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 32, Issue 4
          July 2013
          1215 pages
          ISSN:0730-0301
          EISSN:1557-7368
          DOI:10.1145/2461912
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 July 2013
          Published in tog Volume 32, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader