skip to main content
10.1145/2463209.2488917acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Precise timing analysis for direct-mapped caches

Published:29 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Safety-critical systems require guarantees on their worst-case execution times. This requires modelling of speculative hardware features such as caches that are tailored to improve the average-case performance, while ignoring the worst case, which complicates the Worst Case Execution Time (WCET) analysis problem. Existing approaches that precisely compute WCET suffer from state-space explosion. In this paper, we present a novel cache analysis technique for direct-mapped instruction caches with the same precision as the most precise techniques, while improving analysis time by up to 240 times. This improvement is achieved by analysing individual control points separately, and carrying out optimisations that are not possible with existing techniques.

References

  1. MicroBlaze Processor Reference Guide. www.xilinx.com (Last accessed: 01/10/2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Bui, E. Lee, I. Liu, H. Patel, and J. Reineke. Temporal isolation on multiprocessing architectures. In Proc. of DAC'11, pages 274--279, San Diego, California, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Ding, Y. Liang, and T. Mitra. WCET-centric partial instruction cache locking. In Proc. of DAC'12, pages 412--420, San Francisco, California, June 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Ferdinand, F. Martin, R. Wilhelm, and M. Alt. Cache Behavior Prediction by Abstract Interpretation. Science of Computer Programming, 35:163--189, November 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Kuo, R. Sinha, and P. S. Roop. Efficient WCRT Analysis of Synchronous Programs using Reachability. In Proc. of DAC'11, San Diego, USA, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Kuo, L. H. Yoong, S. Andalam, and P. Roop. Determining the worst-case reaction time of IEC 61499 function blocks. In Proc. INDIN'10, pages 1104--1109, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y.-T. S. Li, S. Malik, and A. Wolfe. Performance estimation of embedded software with instruction cache modeling. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst., 4(3):257--279, July 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Liang and T. Mitra. Static analysis for fast and accurate design space exploration of caches. In Proc. of CODES+ISSS'08, pages 103--108, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. S. Negi, T. Mitra, and A. Roychoudhury. Accurate Estimation of Cache-Related Preemption Delay. In Proc. of CODES+ISSS'03, pages 201--206, CA, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Reineke, D. Grund, C. Berg, and R. Wilhelm. Timing predictability of cache replacement policies. Real-Time Systems, 37(2):99--122, November 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Theiling, C. Ferdinand, and R. Wilhelm. Fast and Precise WCET Prediction by Separated Cache and Path Analyses. Real-Time Systems, 18:157--179, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Wilhelm et al. The Worst-Case Execution-Time Problem---Overview of Methods and Survey of Tools. Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 7(3):1--53, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Precise timing analysis for direct-mapped caches

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '13: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Design Automation Conference
        May 2013
        1285 pages
        ISBN:9781450320719
        DOI:10.1145/2463209

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 May 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '24
        61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 23 - 27, 2024
        San Francisco , CA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader