Ixchel Faniel
ABSTRACT
Field archaeology only recently developed centralized systems for data curation, management, and reuse. Data documentation guidelines, standards, and ontologies have yet to see wide adoption in this discipline. Moreover, repository practices have focused on supporting data collection, deposit, discovery, and access more than data reuse. In this paper we examine the needs of archaeological data reusers, particularly the context they need to understand, verify, and trust data others collect during field studies. We then apply our findings to the existing work on standards development. We find that archaeologists place the most importance on data collection procedures, but the reputation and scholarly affiliation of the archaeologists who conducted the original field studies, the wording and structure of the documentation created during field work, and the repository where the data are housed also inform reuse. While guidelines, standards, and ontologies address some aspects of the context data reusers need, they provide less guidance on others, especially those related to research design. We argue repositories need to address these missing dimensions of context to better support data reuse in archaeology.
References
- Aitchison, K. 2009. Standards and Guidance in Archaeological Archiving: The Work of the Archaeological Archives Forum and the Institute for Archaeologists. The Grey Journal, 5 (2), 67--71.Google Scholar
- Atici, L, Kansa, S., Lev-Tov, J., and Kansa, E. 2012. Other People's Data: A Demonstration of the Imperative of Publishing Primary Data. J ARCHAEOL METHOD TH (April 11), 1--19.Google Scholar
- Binding, C. May, K. and Tudhope, D. 2008. Semantic Interoperability in Archaeological Datasets: Data Mapping and Extraction Via the CIDOC CRM. In Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL '08), B. Christensen-Dalsgaard, D. Castelli, B. Ammitzbøll Jurik, and J. Lippincott, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 280--290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brody, A. 2011. The Archaeology of the Extended Family. In Household Archaeology in Ancient Israel and Beyond, A. Yasur-Landau, J. R. Ebeling, and L. B. Mazow, Eds. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Brown, A, and Perrin, K. 2000. A Model for the Description of Archaeological Archives. English Heritage Centre for Archaeology, Fort Cumberland. http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/archives/archdesc.pdf.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. 2007. Archaeological Archives: A Guide to Best Practice in Creation, Compilation, Transfer and Curation. Archaeological Archives Forum. http://www.archaeologyuk.org/archives/Google Scholar
- Childs, C. 2010. Finders Keepers: A Tale of Archaeological Plunder and Obsession. Little, Brown and Co., New York.Google Scholar
- Condron, F., Richards, J., Robinson, D. and Wise, A. 1999. Strategies for Digital Data - A Survey of User Needs. Archaeology Data Service. York, UK. http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/project/strategies/Google Scholar
- Czyrnyj, A. 2011. Presenting the University of Manitoba's Archaeo-logical Collections Online: Implementation and User Feedback. Doctoral Thesis. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2011. Instructions for Depositing Archaeological Data in EASY. http://www.dans.knaw.nl/sites/default/files/file/archief/Instructies0deponeren/Instructions_for_depositing_archaeological_data_DEF%281%29.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Dibble, H. L., and McPherron, S.P. 1988. On the Computerization of Archaeological Projects. J FIELD ARCHAEOL, 15 (4), 431--440.Google Scholar
- Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI MAG, 24 (3) (September 2003), 75--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doerr, M. and Iorizzo, D. 2008. The Dream of a Global Knowledge Network- A New Approach? J COMPUT CULT HERIT, 1 (1), 1--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eiteljorg, II, H. 1998. Archiving Archeological Data in the Next Millennium. ONE WORLD ARCHAEOL, 21 (6), 21--23.Google Scholar
- Esteva, M., Trelogan, J., Rabinowitz, A., Walling, D. and Pipkin, S. 2010. From the Site to Long-term Preservation: A Reflexive System to Manage and Archive Digital Archaeological Data. In Proceedings of the Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Den Haag, the Netherlands, May 2010, 1--6.Google Scholar
- Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A. and Yakel, E. 2012. Data Reuse and Sensemaking Among Novice Social Scientists. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Baltimore, MD, October 2012.Google Scholar
- Faniel, I.M., and Jacobsen, T.E. 2010. Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues? Data. COMP SUPPORT COMP WORK 19 (3--4) (August), 355--375. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harley, D., Acord, S.K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, .S and King, C.J. 2010. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication?: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. University Of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- Hodder, I, and Hutson, S. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holtorf, C. 2002. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. J MAT CULT, 7 (1), 49--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Institute for Archaeologists. 2009. Standard and Guidance for the Creation, Compilation, Transfer and Deposition of Archaeological Archives. http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/node-files/Archives2009.pdf.Google Scholar
- Isaksen, L. 2011. Archaeology and the Semantic Web. Doctoral Thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, S., Richards, J., Ciravegna, F., Waller, S., Chapman, S. and Zhang, Z. 2009. The Archaeotools Project: Faceted Classification and Natural Language Processing in an Archaeological Context. PHILOS T ROY SOC, 367 (1897) (June), 2507--2519.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kansa, E. 2012. Openness and Archaeology's Information Ecosystem. WORLD ARCHAEOL, 44 (4): 498--520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kansa, S.W., Kansa, E.C., and Schultz, J.M. 2007. An Open Context for Near Eastern Archaeology. NEAR EAST ARCHAEOL 70 (4) (December), 188--194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keene, S. 2005. Fragments of the World: Uses of Museum Collections. Elsevier, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Kintigh, K.W. 2006. The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. AM ANTIQUITY 71(3):567--578.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McManus, E. 2012. Unearthing Archives: An Examination of Documents Generated in the Course of Archaeological Fieldwork in Canada. Doctoral Thesis. The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
- Merriman, N. and Swain, H. 1999. Archaeological Archives: Serving the Public Interest? EUR J ARCHAEOL 2 (2), 249--267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niven, K. 2008. Guidelines for Depositors Version 1.3. Archaeology Data Service. http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/project/userinfo/deposit.cfmGoogle Scholar
- Parks Canada. 2005. Archaeological Recording Manual: Excavations and Surveys. http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/docs/pc/guide/fp-es/titre-title.aspx.Google Scholar
- Richards, J. 1997. Preservation and Re-use of Digital Data: The Role of the Archaeology Data Services. ANTIQUITY, 71 (274) (December), 1057--1059.Google Scholar
- Richards, J., Jeffrey, S., Waller, S., Ciravegna, F., Chapman, S and Zhang, Z. 2011. The Archaeology Data Service and the Archaeotools Project: Faceted Classification and Natural Language Processing. In Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, E.C. Kansa, S.W. Kansa and E. Watrall, Eds. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, CA, 31--56.Google Scholar
- Spielmann, K., and Kintigh, K. 2011. "The Digital Archaeological Record: The Potentials of Archaeozoological Data Integration Through tDAR" The SAA Archaeological Record (January), 22--25.Google Scholar
- Tudhope, D., Binding, C. and May, K. (2008), Semantic Interoperability Issues from a Case Study in Archaeology. In Semantic Interoperability in the European Digital Library, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop (SIEDL 2008), associated with 5th European Semantic Web Conference, S. Kollias and J. Cousins, Eds. Tenerife, Spain, 88--99.Google Scholar
- Van House, N. 2002. Digital Libraries and Practices of Trust: Networked Biodiversity Information. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 16 (1): 99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wallis, J.C., Borgman, C.L., Mayernik, M.S., Pepe, A., Ramanathan, N., and Hansen, M. 2007. Know Thy Sensor: Trust, Data Quality, and Data Integrity in Scientific Digital Libraries. In European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries 4675, 380--391. Budapest, Hungary. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Winter, B.J. 1996. Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Reposition of Archaeological Collections in Canada. Doctoral Thesis. Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Index Terms
The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse
Comments