article

Comparative analysis of the quantization of color spaces on the basis of the CIELAB color-difference formula

Abstract

This article discusses the CIELAB color spave within the limits of optimal colors including the complete volume of object colors. A graphical representation of this color space is composed of planes of constant lightness L* with an net of lines parallel to the a* and b* axes. This uniform net is projected onto a number of other color spaces (CIE XYZ, tristimulus RGB, predistorted RGB, and YCC color space) to demonstrate and study the structure of color differences in these spaces on the basis of CIELAB color difference formulas. Two formulas are considered: the CIE 1976 formula *** and the newer CiE 1994 formula ***. The various color spaces considered are uniformly quantized and the grid of quantized points is transformed into CIELAB colordinates to study the distribution of color differences due to basic quantization steps and to spacify the areas of the colors with the highest sensitivity to color discrimination. From a threshold value for the maximum color difference among neighboring quantized points searched for in each color space, concepts for the quantization of the color spaces are drived. The results are compared to quantization concepts based on average values of quantization errors published in previous work. In addition to color spaces bounded by the optimal colors, the studies are also applied to device-dependent color spaces limited by the range of a positive RGB cube or by the gamut of colors of practical print processes (thermal dye sublimation, chromalin, and match print). For all the color spaces, estimation of the number of distinguishable colors are given on the basis of a threshold value for the color difference perception of *** = 1 and *** = 1.

References

  1. ALMAN, D.H. 1993. CIE Technical Committee 1-29. Industrial color difference evaluation. Progress report. Color Res. Appl. 18, 137-139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CCIR. 1982. CCIR Recommendation 601-1. Encoding parameters of digital television for studios. Geneva 1982-1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CCIR. 1990. CCIR Recommendation 709 (1990). Basic parameter values for the HDTV standard for studio and for international programme exchange. Geneva.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CIE. 1986a. Colorimetry. CIE Pub. 15.2, 2nd ed., Commission International de L'Eclairage, Vienna, 29-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CIE. 1986b. Colorimetry. CIE Pub. 15.2, 2nd ed., Commission International de L'Eclairage, Vienna, 30-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CIE. 1986c. Colorimetry. CIE Pub. 15.2, 2nd ed., Commission International de L'Eclairage, Vienna, 56-58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. CIE. 1993. Parametric effects in color-difference evaluation. CIE Pub. 101, Commission International de L'Eclairage, Vienna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CIE. 1995. Industrial color-difference evaluation. CIE Pub. 116, Commission International de L'Eclairage, Vienna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. KASSON, M. J. AND PLOUFFE, W. 1992. An Analysis of Selected Computer Interchange Color Spaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 11, 4 (Oct.), 373-405. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. KODAK. 1992. Photo CD products 1992. A planning guide for developers. Kodak Part Number DCI-200RJ Rochester, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. LANG, H. 1978. Farbmetrik und Farbfernsehen. Oldenbourg, Munich.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. LANG, H. 1995. Farbwiedergabe in den Medien, Fernsehen, Film, Druck. Muster-Schmidt Verlag, G~ttingen, Zfirich.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Loo, M. R. AND RIGG, B. 1987. BFD (l:c) colour-difference formula. Part 1: Development of the formula. JSDC 103 (Feb.), 126-132. Part 2: Performance of the formula. JSDC 103 (March), 86-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MACADAM, D.L. 1935a. The theory of the maximum visual efficiency of color materials. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 25, 249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MACADAM, D.L. 1935b. Maximum visual efficiency of color materials, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 25, 361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. MAHY, M., MELLAERT, B. V., AND VAN EYCKEN, O.A. 1991. The influence of uniform color spaces on color image processing: A comparative study of CIELAB, CIELUV, and ATD. J. Imag. Technol. 17, 5 (Oct.), 232-243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. POINTER, M.R. 1980. The gamut of real surface colours. Color Res. Appl. 5, No. 3, 145-155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. RICHTER, M. 1979. Einf~hrung in die Farbmetrik. 2. Auflage 1981, de Gruyter, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ROSCH, S. 1929. Darstellung der Farbenlehre ffir die Zwecke der Mineralogie, Fortschr. Mineral. Krist. Petrogr. 13, 143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. SAE. 1985. SAE J 1545 1985. Recommended practice, instrumental color difference measurement for exterior finishes, textiles, and colored trim. SAE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. SCHRODINGER, E. 1920. Theorie der Pigmente von gr6Bter Leuchtkraft, Ann. Physik (IV) 62, 603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SCHWARZ, M. W., COWAN, W. B., AND BEATTY, J. C. 1987. An experimental comparison of RGB, YIQ, LAB, HSV, and opponent color models. ACM Trans. Graph. 6, 2 (April), 123-158. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. STOKES, M., FAIRCHILD, M. D., AND BERNS, R.S. 1992a. Precision requirements for digital color reproduction. ACM Trans. Graph. 11, 4 (Oct.), 406-422. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. STOKES, M., FAIRCHILD, M. D., AND BERNS, R. S. 1992b. Colorimetrical quantified visual tolerances for pictorial images. In Techn. Association of the Graphic Arts, TAGA Proceedings, vol. 2, M. Pearson Ed., 357-777.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparative analysis of the quantization of color spaces on the basis of the CIELAB color-difference formula

              Reviews

              Svetlana Segarceanu

              The main goal of this study is to describe the range of optimal colors in a specified grid of the CIELAB space and to point out how these colors are represented when transformed into a number of other typical color spaces. A second aim is to compare the quantization of the different spaces. Therefore, the quantization based on the CIELAB difference formulas is applied to several other color spaces. The introduction briefly presents previous research in this field and describes the authors' approach. The second section defines the basic concepts of the analysis, namely the CIELAB system and the two difference formulas used to compare two colors. The first, D E ab , assumes a mathematical approximation by which these differences are given in terms of L * , the perceived lightness, and the coordinates a * and b * on the opponent color axes green-red and blue-yellow, respectively. The second, D E * 94 , is more complicated and is expressed in terms of differences of lightness, chroma, and hue. The optimal color space is represented as being composed of planes of constant lightness. Section 2.3 discusses the problem of establishing a threshold value for color differences in order to quantize the color space. Next, a general frame for defining a quantization box is presented. In any quantization, the step between a color point and one of its neighbors produces a color difference. The authors take into account the maximum difference produced by a diagonal step, denoted by D E worst . One aim of the study is to find D E max for all the color points, and to find a quantization concept that keeps it below a fixed value. This maximum value is computed for the CIELAB space and the general D E ab formula, assuming certain quantization conditions. Section 3 establishes the number of distinguishable colors and the type of quantization for a given threshold. Section 4 presents graphical representations of the uniform grid of colors of the CIELAB space when it is transformed into the primary color spaces CIEXYZ and RGB ITU-RBT , the predistorted R ?G ?B ? color space, and the YTU color space. The variations of D E worst and D E max for both difference formulas, along lines of optimal colors in each of these color spaces, are plotted against hue angle and lightness, and suitable quantization concepts for color spaces are derived from the maximum color quantization step obtained in each color space. In section 5, the authors present the CIELUV color space and compare the CIELUV and CIELAB spaces by evaluating the color differences in the CIELUV space using the CIELAB color difference formulas. Section 6 is devoted to device-dependent color spaces. In the last part of the paper, the authors discuss<__?__Pub Caret> the results. The study is interesting, neatly presented, and beautifully illustrated. It is useful for people working with three-dimensional graphics and those interested in the analysis of color spaces.

              Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

              Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader
              About Cookies On This Site

              We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

              Learn more

              Got it!