skip to main content
10.1145/2488388.2488435acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring personalization of web search

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Web search is an integral part of our daily lives. Recently, there has been a trend of personalization in Web search, where different users receive different results for the same search query. The increasing personalization is leading to concerns about Filter Bubble effects, where certain users are simply unable to access information that the search engines' algorithm decides is irrelevant. Despite these concerns, there has been little quantification of the extent of personalization in Web search today, or the user attributes that cause it.
In light of this situation, we make three contributions. First, we develop a methodology for measuring personalization in Web search results. While conceptually simple, there are numerous details that our methodology must handle in order to accurately attribute differences in search results to personalization. Second, we apply our methodology to 200 users on Google Web Search; we find that, on average, 11.7% of results show differences due to personalization, but that this varies widely by search query and by result ranking. Third, we investigate the causes of personalization on Google Web Search. Surprisingly, we only find measurable personalization as a result of searching with a logged in account and the IP address of the searching user. Our results are a first step towards understanding the extent and effects of personalization on Web search engines today.

References

[1]
Personalized Search Graduates from Google Labs. News From Google Blog, 2005. http://bit.ly/Tndpgf.
[2]
J. Bar-Ilan, K. Keenoy, E. Yaari, and M. Levene. User rankings of search engine results. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58(9), 2007.
[3]
E. Cutrell and Z. Guan. What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. CHI, 2007.
[4]
F. Crown and M. L. Nelson. Agreeing to Disagree: Search Engines and Their Public Interfaces. JCDL, 2007.
[5]
Z. Cheng, B. Gao, and T.-Y. Liu. Actively Predicting Diverse Search Intent from User Browsing Behaviors. WWW, 2010.
[6]
Z. Dou, R. Song, and J.-R. Wen. A Large-scale Evaluation and Analysis of Personalized Search Strategies. WWW, 2007.
[7]
F. J. Damerau. A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. CACM, 7(3), 1964.
[8]
J. T. S. T. Dumais and E. Horvitz. Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. SIGIR, 2005.
[9]
H. Green. Breaking Out of Your Internet Filter Bubble. Forbes, 2011. http://onforb.es/oYWbDf.
[10]
S. Guha, B. Cheng, and P. Francis. Challenges in Measuring Online Advertising Systems. IMC, 2010.
[11]
S. Goel, J. M. Hofman, and M. I. Sirer. Who Does What on the Web: A Large-scale Study of Browsing Behavior. ICWSM, 2012.
[12]
Z. Guan and E. Cutrell. An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. CHI, 2007.
[13]
L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. SIGIR, 2004.
[14]
Google Zeitgeist. http://www.googlezeitgeist.com.
[15]
B. Horling and M. Kulick. Personalized Search for Everyone. Google Official Blog, 2009. http://bit.ly/71RcmJ.
[16]
J. Hu, H.-J. Zeng, H. Li, C. Niu, and Z. Chen. Demographic Prediction Based on User's Browsing Behavior. WWW, 2007.
[17]
M. Hines. Google Takes Searching Personally. CNet, 2004. http://cnet.co/V37pZD.
[18]
How Rick Santorum's 'Google Problem' Has Endured. http://n.pr/wefdnc.
[19]
F. Liu, C. Yu, and W. Meng. Personalized web search by mapping user queries to categories. CIKM, 2002.
[20]
L. Lorigo, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, T. Joachims, L. Granka, and G. Gay. The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Inf. Process. Manage., 42(4), 2006.
[21]
D. Mattioli. On Orbitz, Mac Users Steered to Pricier Hotels. Wall Street Journal, 2012. http://on.wsj.com/LwTnPH.
[22]
J. Mikians, L. Gyarmati, V. Erramilli, and N. Laoutaris. Detecting Price and Search Discrimination on the Internet. HotNets, 2012.
[23]
A. Pretschner and S. Gauch. Ontology based personalized search. ICTAI, 1999.
[24]
A. Pansari and M. Mayer. This is a test. This is only a test. Google Official Blog, 2006. http://bit.ly/Ldbb0.
[25]
B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, T. Joachims, L. Lorigo, G. Gay, and L. Granka. In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance. J. Comp. Med. Comm., 12(3), 2007.
[26]
E. Pariser. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011.
[27]
J. Pitkow, H. Schutze, T. Cass, R. Cooley, D. Turnbull, A. Edmonds, E. Adar, and T. Breuel. Personalized search. CACM, 45(9), 2002.
[28]
PhantomJS. http://phantomjs.org.
[29]
F. Qiu and J. Cho. Automatic Identification of User Interest for Personalized Search. WWW, 2006.
[30]
Quantcast. Top Sites for the United States. 2012. http://www.quantcast.com/top-sites.
[31]
F. Roesner, T. Kohno, and D. Wetherall. Detecting and Defending Against Third-Party Tracking on the Web. NSDI, 2012.
[32]
A. Singhal. Some Thoughts on Personalization. Google Inside Search Blog, 2011. http://bit.ly/tJS4xT.
[33]
A. Singhal. Search, Plus Your World. Google Official Blog, 2012. http://bit.ly/yUJnCl.
[34]
D. Sullivan. Bing Results Get Local and Personalized. Search Engine Land, 2011. http://selnd.com/hY4djp.
[35]
D. Sullivan. Why Google ''Personalizes" Results Based on Obama Searches But Not Romney. Search Engine Land, 2012. http://selnd.com/PyfvvY.
[36]
J.-T. Sun, H.-J. Zeng, H. Liu, Y. Lu, and Z. Chen. CubeSVD: A Novel Approach to Personalized Web Search. WWW, 2005.
[37]
M. Sun, G. Lebanon, and K. Collins-Thompson. Visualizing Differences in Web Search Algorithms using the Expected Weighted Hoeffding Distance. WWW, 2010.
[38]
N. Singer. The Trouble with the Echo Chamber Online. The New York Times, 2011. http://nyti.ms/jcTih2.
[39]
X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai. Implicit user modeling for personalized search. CIKM, 2005.
[40]
Y. Shen, J. Yan, S. Yan, L. Ji, N. Liu, and Z. Chen. Sparse Hidden-Dynamics Conditional Random Fields for User Intent Understanding. WWW, 2011.
[41]
L. A. M. J. Silva. Relevance Ranking for Geographic IR. GIR, 2006.
[42]
Selenium. http://selenium.org.
[43]
B. Tan, X. Shen, and C. Zhai. Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy. KDD, 2006.
[44]
L. Vaughan. New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested. Inf. Process. Manage., 40(4), 2004.
[45]
A. Witten. Google's New Privacy Policy. Google Official Blog, 2012. http://bit.ly/wVr4mF.
[46]
M. Wines. Google to Alert Users to Chinese Censorship. The New York Times, 2012. http://nyti.ms/JRhGZS.
[47]
C. E. Wills and C. Tatar. Understanding What They Do with What They Know. WPES, 2012.
[48]
WebMD 2011 Year in Health. http://on.webmd.com/eBPFxH.
[49]
Y. Xu, B. Zhang, Z. Chen, and K. Wang. Privacy-Enhancing Personalized Web Search. WWW, 2007.
[50]
B. Yu and G. Cai. A query-aware document ranking method for geographic information retrieval. GIR, 2007.
[51]
X. Yi, H. Raghavan, and C. Leggetter. Discovering Users' Specific Geo Intention in Web Search. WWW, 2009.
[52]
comScore August 2012 U.S. Search Results. http://bit.ly/ThGnOc.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Measuring and explaining disagreement in bird taxonomyEuropean Journal of Taxonomy10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2601943Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/5407226(e54072)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Freely available, online videos to support neurological physiotherapists and students in task-specific training skill acquisition: a scoping reviewBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-05545-524:1Online publication date: 31-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Measuring personalization of web search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '13: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
      May 2013
      1628 pages
      ISBN:9781450320351
      DOI:10.1145/2488388

      Sponsors

      • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
      • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. personalization
      2. web search

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WWW '13
      Sponsor:
      • NICBR
      • CGIBR
      WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
      May 13 - 17, 2013
      Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 125 of 831 submissions, 15%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)242
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Measuring and explaining disagreement in bird taxonomyEuropean Journal of Taxonomy10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2601943Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/5407226(e54072)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Freely available, online videos to support neurological physiotherapists and students in task-specific training skill acquisition: a scoping reviewBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-05545-524:1Online publication date: 31-May-2024
      • (2024)Combating Missed Recalls in E-commerce Search: A CoT-Prompting Testing ApproachCompanion Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3663529.3663842(220-231)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Understanding the Relationship Between Social Identity and Self-Expression Through Animated Gifs on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410318:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Google Search in India: Unveiling the Geo-Personalized WebProceedings of the 7th Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (11th ACM IKDD CODS and 29th COMAD)10.1145/3632410.3632420(403-411)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Algorithmic Misjudgement in Google Search Results: Evidence from Auditing the US Online Electoral Information EnvironmentProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658916(433-443)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Dynamics in Search Engine Query Suggestions for European PoliticiansProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644006(279-289)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
      • (2024)Comprehensively Auditing the TikTok Mobile AppCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3651260(1198-1201)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2024)Perceptions in Pixels: Analyzing Perceived Gender and Skin Tone in Real-world Image Search ResultsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645666(1249-1259)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media