10.1145/2567948.2579208acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedings
research-article

Fluctuation and burst response in social media

ABSTRACT

A salient dynamic property of social media is bursting be- havior. In this paper, we study bursting behavior in relation to the structure of fluctuation, known as fluctuation-response relation, to reveal the origin of bursts. More specifically, we study the temporal relation between a preceding baseline fluctuation and the successive burst response using a frequency time series of 3,000 keywords on Twitter. We find three types of keyword time series in terms of the fluctuation-response relation. For the first type of keyword, the baseline fluctuation has a positive correlation with the burst size; as the preceding fluctuation increases, the burst size increases. These bursts are caused endogenously as a result of word-of-mouth interactions in a social network; the keyword is sensitive only to the internal context of the system. For the second type, there is a critical threshold in the fluctuation value up to which a positive correlation is observed. Beyond this value, the size of the bursts becomes independent from the fluctuation size. Our analysis shows that this critical threshold emerges because the bursts in the time series are endogenous and exogenous. This type of keyword is sensitive to internal and external stimuli. The third type is mainly bursts caused by exogenous bursts. This type of keyword is mostly sensitive only to external stimuli. These results are useful for characterizing how excitable a keyword is on Twitter and could be used, for example, for marketing purposes.

References

  1. R. A. Brooks. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 47:139--159, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Crane and D. Sornette. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(45):15649--15653, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Gruhl, R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, and A. Tomkins. Information diffusion through blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 491--501, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. M. Hanczyc and T. Ikegami. Chemical basis for minimal cognition. Artificial Life, 16(3):233--243, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. M. Hanczyc, T. Toyota, T. Ikegami, N. Packard, and T. Sugawara. Chemistry at the oil-water interface: Self-propelled oil droplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129(30):9386--9391, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Kleinberg. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 91--101, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proc. of the 19th International World Wide Web, pages 591--600, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Lehmann, B. Gonçalves, and C. C. José J. Ramasco. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In Proc. 21st Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 251--260, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Nolfi. Evolving non-trivial behaviors on real robots: A garbage collecting robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22:187--198, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. Oosawa. Effect of field fluctuation on a macromolecular system. J. Theor. Biol., 52:175--186, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Pfeifer, M. Lungarella, and F. Iida. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science, 318:1088--1093, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. E. Raichle, A. M. MacLeod, A. Z. Snyder, W. J. Powers, D. A. Gusnard, and G. L. Shulman. Inaugural article: A default mode of brain function. PNAS, 98:676--82, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. E. Raichle and A. Z. Snyder. A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. NeuroImage, 37(4):1083--1090, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. E. Reichl. A Modern Course in Statistical Physics. University of Texas, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Ruelle. Converstations on nonequilibrium physics with an extraterrestrial. Physics Today, 4:48--53, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Sato, Y. I. T. Yomo, and K. Kaneko. On the relation between fluctuation and response in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100(24):14086--14090, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Fluctuation and burst response in social media

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!