Discrete stochastic microfacet models

Abstract

This paper investigates rendering glittery surfaces, ones which exhibit shifting random patterns of glints as the surface or viewer moves. It applies both to dramatically glittery surfaces that contain mirror-like flakes and also to rough surfaces that exhibit more subtle small scale glitter, without which most glossy surfaces appear too smooth in close-up. These phenomena can in principle be simulated by high-resolution normal maps, but maps with tiny features create severe aliasing problems under narrow-angle illumination. In this paper we present a stochastic model for the effects of random subpixel structures that generates glitter and spatial noise that behave correctly under different illumination conditions and viewing distances, while also being temporally coherent so that they look right in motion. The model is based on microfacet theory, but it replaces the usual continuous microfacet distribution with a discrete distribution of scattering particles on the surface. A novel stochastic hierarchy allows efficient evaluation in the presence of large numbers of random particles, without ever having to consider the particles individually. This leads to a multiscale procedural BRDF that is readily implemented in standard rendering systems, and which converges back to the smooth case in the limit.

References

1. Ashikhmin, M., and Shirley, P. 2000. An anisotropic Phong BRDF model. J. Graph. Tools 5, 2 (Feb.), 25--32.
2. Booth, J. 1844. IV. on the rectification and quadrature of the spherical ellipse. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 25, 163, 18--38.
3. Booth, J. 1852. Researches on the geometrical properties of elliptic integrals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 142, 311--416.
4. Boyd, S., and Vandenberghe, L. 2004. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
5. Cook, R. L., and DeRose, T. 2005. Wavelet noise. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 2005 Proceedings) 24, 3, 803--811.
6. Cook, R. L., and Torrance, K. E. 1981. A reflectance model for computer graphics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '81, ACM.
7. Dekker, N., Kirchner, E. J. J., Supèr, R., van den Kieboom, G. J., and Gottenbos, R. 2010. Total appearance differences for metallic and pearlescent materials: Contributions from color and texture. Color Research & Application 36, 1 (Dec.), 4--14.
8. Devroye, L. 1986. Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer-Verlag.
9. Ershov, S., Khodulev, A., and Kolchin, K. 1999. Simulation of sparkles in metallic paints. In Proceedings of Graphicon 1999, 121--128.
10. Ershov, S., Kolchin, K., and Myszkouwski, K. 2001. Rendering pearlescent appearance based on paint-composition modeling. Comp. Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAPHICS) 20, 3.
11. Fairchild, M. D., and Johnson, G. M. 2005. On the salience of novel stimuli: Adaptation and image noise. In Proceedings of the IS&T/SID Color Imaging Conference, 333--338.
12. Galassi, M. e. a. 2009. GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual, 3rd ed ed. Network Theory Ltd.
13. Günther, J., Chen, T., Goesele, M., Wald, I., and Seidel, H.-P. 2005. Efficient acquistion and realistic rendering of car paint. In VMV 2005 Proceedings.
14. Han, C., Sun, B., Ramamoorthi, R., and Grinspun, E. 2007. Frequency domain normal map filtering. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2007) 26, 3, 28:1--28:12.
15. Igehy, H. 1999. Tracing ray differentials. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '99, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
16. Jakob, W., 2010. Mitsuba renderer. http://www.mitsuba-renderer.org.
17. Kachitvichyanukul, V., and Schmeiser, B. W. 1988. Binomial random variate generation. Commun. ACM 31, 2 (Feb.), 216--222.
18. Keller, A., Premoze, S., and Raab, M. 2012. Advanced (quasi) monte carlo methods for image synthesis. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, ACM, SIGGRAPH '12, 21:1--21:46.
19. Kirchner, E., van den Kieboom, G.-J., Njo, L., Supèr, R., and Gottenbos, R. 2007. Observation of visual texture of metallic and pearlescent materials. Color Research & Application 32, 4, 256--266.
20. Lagae, A., Lefebvre, S., Drettakis, G., and Dutré, P. 2009. Procedural noise using sparse Gabor convolution. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3 (July), 1.
21. McCamy, C. S. 1996. Observation and measurement of the appearance of metallic materials. Part I. Macro appearance. Color Research & Application 21, 4, 293.
22. McCamy, C. S. 1998. Observation and measurement of the appearance of metallic materials. Part II. Micro appearance. Color Research & Application 23, 6, 362--373.
23. Olano, M., and Baker, D. 2010. Lean mapping. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, ACM, I3D '10, 181--188.
24. Perlin, K. 2002. Improving noise. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 2002 Proceedings) 21, 3, 681--682.
25. Rump, M., Müller, G., Sarlette, R., Koch, D., and Klein, R. 2008. Photo-realistic rendering of metallic car paint from image-based measurements. Computer Graphics Forum (EUROGRAPHICS Proceedings) 27, 2.
26. Schneider, P., and Eberly, D. H. 2002. Geometric tools for computer graphics. Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Toksvig, M. 2005. Mipmapping normal maps. Journal of Graphics Tools 10, 3, 65--71.
28. Torrance, K. E., and Sparrow, E. M. 1967. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. JOSA 57, 9, 1105--1112.
29. Veach, E. 1997. Robust Monte Carlo Methods for Light Transport Simulation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
30. Walter, B., Marschner, S. R., Li, H., and Torrance, K. E. 2007. Microfacet models for refraction through rough surfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th Eurographics Conference on Rendering Techniques, 195--206.
31. Wheeler, D. J., and Needham, R. M. 1995. TEA, a tiny encryption algorithm. In Fast Software Encryption, Springer, 363--366.
32. Yan, L.-Q., Hašan, M., Jakob, W., Lawrence, J., Marschner, S., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2014. Rendering glints on high-resolution normal-mapped specular surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2014) 33, 4.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Image manipulation

      • Texturing