skip to main content
research-article

Influence of Search Neutrality on the Economics of Advertisement-Financed Content

Published:28 October 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The search neutrality debate questions the ranking methods of search engines. We analyze the issue when content providers offer content for free, but get revenues from advertising. We investigate the noncooperative game among competing content providers under different ranking policies. When the search engine is not involved with high-quality content providers, it should adopt neutral ranking, also maximizing user quality-of-experience. If the search engine controls high-quality content, favoring its ranking and adding advertisement yield a larger revenue. Though user perceived quality may not be impaired, the advertising revenues of the other content providers drastically decrease.

References

  1. S. Athey and G. Ellison. 2011. Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econ. 126, 3, 1213--1270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Berman and Z. Katona. 2013. The role of search engine optimization in search marketing. Market. Sci. 32, 4, 644--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Chen and C. He. 2011. Paid placement: Advertising and search on the internet*. Econ. J. 121, 556, F309--F328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Coucheney, P. Maille, and B. Tuffin. 2012. Comparison of search engines non-neutral and neutral behaviors. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 40, 2, 14--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. D'Acquisto, Maille, M. Naldi, and B. Tuffin. 2012. Impact on retail prices of non-neutral wholesale prices for content providers. In Proceedings of the 8th Euro-NF Conference on Next Generation Internet (NGI'12). 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Gandal. 2001. The dynamics of competition in the Internet search engine market. Int. J. Industr. Organiz. 19, 7, 1103--1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Grimmelmann. 2010. Some skepticism about search neutrality. InThe Next Digital Decade: Essays on the Future of the Internet. TechFreedom, 435--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Hagiu and B. Jullien. 2011. Why do intermediaries divert search? RAND J. Econ. 42, 2, 337--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. D. Introna and H. Nissenbaum. 2000. Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. Inf. Soc. 16, 3, 169--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Levene. 2011. An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation. John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Maille, E. Markakis, M. Naldi, G. D. Stamoulis, and B. Tuffin. 2012. Sponsored search auctions: An overview of research with emphasis on game theoretic aspects. Electron. Commerce Res. 12, 3, 265--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Maille and B. Tuffin. 2014. Telecommunication Network Economics: From Theory to Applications. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. A. Manne and J. D. Wright. 2011. If search neutrality is the answer, what's the question? Law and Economics Research Paper Series 11-37, George Mason University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Naldi. 2003. Concentration indices and zipf's law. Econ. Lett. 78, 3, 329--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Naldi and G. D'Acquisto. 2008. Performance of the vickrey auction for digital goods under various bid distributions. Perform. Eval. 65, 1, 10--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Odlyzko. 2009. Network neutrality, search neutrality, and the never-ending conflict between efficiency and fairness in markets. Rev. Netw. Econ. 8, 1, 40--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Pilkington and C. Liston-Heyes. 2004. Inventive concentration: An analysis of fuel cell patents. Sci. Public Policy 31, 1, 14--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T.-R. Sheu and K. Carley. 2001. Monopoly power on the web - A preliminary investigation of search engines. In Proceedings of the 29th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC'01).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Telang, U. Rajan, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2004. The market structure for internet search engines. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21, 2, 137--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. White. 2013. Search engines: Left side quality versus right side profits. Int. J. Industr. Organiz. 31, 690--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Influence of Search Neutrality on the Economics of Advertisement-Financed Content

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!