skip to main content
research-article

Economic Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Digital Services

Published:28 October 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Nowadays digital services, such as cloud computing and network access services, allow dynamic resource allocation and virtual resource isolation. This trend can create a new paradigm of flexible pricing schemes. A simple pricing scheme is to allocate multiple isolated service classes with differentiated prices, namely Paris Metro Pricing (PMP). The benefits of PMP are its simplicity and applicability to a wide variety of general digital services, without considering specific performance guarantees for different service classes. The central issue of our study is whether PMP is economically viable, namely whether it will produce more profit for the service provider and whether it will achieve more social welfare. Prior studies had only considered specific models and arrived at conflicting conclusions. In this article, we identify unifying principles in a general setting and derive general sufficient conditions that can guarantee the viability of PMP. We further apply the results to analyze various examples of digital services.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Parkash Chander and Luc Leruth. 1989. The optimal product mix for a monopolist in the presence of congestion effects. Int. J. Industr. Organiz. 7, 4, 437--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andre de Palma and Luc Leruth. 1989. Congestion and game in capacity: A duopoly analysis in the presence of network externalities. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 15--16, 389--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard Gibbens, Robin Mason, and Richard Steinberg. 2000. Internet service classes under competition. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 18, 2, 2490--2498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ori Haimanko and Richard Steinberg. 2000. Price Symmetry in a Duopoly with Congestion. Judge Institute of Management Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ravi Jain, Tracy Mullen, and Robert Hausman. 2001. Analysis of paris metro pricing strategy for qos with a single service provider. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS'01). 495--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Andrew Odlyzko. 1999. Paris metro pricing for the internet. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'99). 140--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andrew Odlyzko, Bill St. Arnaud, Erik Stallman, and Michael Weinberg. 2012. Know your limits: Considering the role of data caps and usage based billing in internet access service. https://www.publicknowledge. org/files/UBP%20paper%20FINAL.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shaolei Ren, Jaeok Park, and Mihaela van der Schaar. 2011. User subscription dynamics and revenue maximization in communications markets. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM'11). 2696--2704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kenneth F. Riley, Michael P. Hobson, and Stephen J. Bence. 2006. Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David Ros and Bruno Tuffin. 2004. A mathematical model of the paris metro pricing scheme for charging packet networks. Comput. Netw. 46, 1, 73--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hiroaki Sakurai, Shojij Kasahara, and Naotoshi Adachi. 2003. Internet pricing and user opt-out strategy under two isps competition. In Proceedings of the International Network Optimization Conference (INOC'03). 495--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Soumya Sen, Carlee Joe-Wong, Sangtae Ha, and Mung Chiang. 2012. Incentivizing time-shifting of data: A survey of time-dependent pricing for internet access. IEEE Comm. Mag. 11, 50, 91--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Srinivas Shakkottai, Rayadurgam Srikant, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Daron Accemoglu. 2007. The price of simplicity. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 26, 7, 1269--1276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Economic Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Digital Services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!