10.1145/2702123.2702388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The advent of wearables (e.g., smartwatches, smartglasses, and digital jewelry) anticipates the need for text entry methods on very small devices. We conduct fundamental research on this topic using 3 qwerty-based soft keyboards for 3 different screen sizes, motivated by the extensive training that users have with qwerty keyboards. In addition to ZoomBoard (a soft keyboard for diminutive screens), we propose a callout-based soft keyboard and ZShift, a novel extension of the Shift pointing technique. We conducted a comprehensive user study followed by extensive analyses on performance, usability, and short-term learning. Our results show that different small screen sizes demand different types of assistance. In general, manufacturers can benefit from these findings by selecting an appropriate qwerty soft keyboard for their devices. Ultimately, this work provides designers, researchers, and practitioners with new understanding of qwerty soft keyboard design space and its scalability for tiny touchscreens.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p669.mp4

References

  1. Baudisch, P., and Chu, G. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. Proc. CHI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bradley, J. V. Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 53 (1958).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, X., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. Swipeboard: A text entry technique for ultra-small interfaces that supports novice to expert transitions. Proc. UIST (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dunlop, M., and Levine, J. Multidimensional pareto optimization of touchscreen keyboards for speed, familiarity and improved spell checking. Proc. CHI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dunlop, M. D., and Crossan, A. Predictive text entry methods for mobile phones. Personal Technologies 4, 2-3 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dunlop, M. D., and Masters, M. M. Pickup usability dominates: A brief history of mobile text entry research and adoption. Int. J. Mobile Hum-Comput. Int. 1, 1 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Felzer, T., and Nordmann, R. Alternative text entry using different input methods. Proc. ASSETS (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J. O., and Wigdor, D. Typing on flat glass: examining ten-finger expert typing patterns on touch surfaces. Proc. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goldberg, D., and Richardson, C. Touch-typing with a stylus. Proc. CHI (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gunawardana, A., Paek, T., and Meek, C. Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards. Proc. IUI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harrison, C., and Hudson, S. E. Abracadabra: wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices. Proc. UIST (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Henze, N., Rukzio, E., and Boll, S. Observational and experimental investigation of typing behaviour using virtual keyboards for mobile devices. Proc. CHI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Himberg, J., Häkkilä, J., Kangas, P., and Mäntyjärvi, J. On-line personalization of a touch screen based keyboard. Proc. IUI (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ingmarsson, M., Dinka, D., and Zhai, S. TNT: a numeric keypad based text input method. Proc. CHI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Isokoski, P., and Raisamo, R. Device independent text input: a rationale and an example. Proc. AVI (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. James, C. L., and Reischel, K. M. Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance. Proc. CHI (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kienzle, W., and Hinckley, K. Writing handwritten messages on a small touchscreen. Proc. MobileHCI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kim, S., Sohn, M., Pak, J., and Lee, W. One-key keyboard: a very small QWERTY keyboard supporting text entry for wearable computing. Proc. OZCHI (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Komninos, A., and Dunlop, M. Text input on a smart watch. Pervasive Computing 13, 4 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kristensson, P. O., and Zhai, S. Relaxing stylus typing precision by geometric pattern matching. Proc. IUI (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Leiva, L. A., and Sanchis-Trilles, G. Representatively memorable: Sampling the right phrase set to get the text entry experiment right. Proc. CHI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Li, F. C. Y., Guy, R. T., Yatani, K., and Truong, K. N. The 1line keyboard: a QWERTY layout in a single line. Proc. UIST (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lyons, K., Nguyen, D., Ashbrook, D., and White, S. Facet: a multi-segment wrist worn system. Proc. UIST (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lyons, K., Starner, T., Plaisted, D., Fusia, J., Lyons, A., Drew, A., and Looney, E. Twiddler typing: One-handed chording text entry for mobile phones. Proc. CHI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. MacKenzie, I. S., and Soukoreff, R. W. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. Proc. CHI EA (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. MacKenzie, I. S., Soukoreff, R. W., and Helga, J. 1 thumb, 4 buttons, 20 words per minute: design and evaluation of H4-writer. Proc. UIST (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. The immediate usability of graffiti. Proc. GI (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. Proc. CHI (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Oney, S., Harrison, C., Ogan, A., and Wiese, J. ZoomBoard: a diminutive QWERTY soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices. Proc. CHI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Oulasvirta, A., Reichel, A., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Bachynskyi, M., Vertanen, K., and Kristensson, P. O. Improving two-thumb text entry on touchscreen devices. Proc. CHI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Partridge, K., Chatterjee, S., Sazawal, V., Borriello, G., and Want, R. TiltType: accelerometer-supported text entry for very small devices. Proc. UIST (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Perlin, K. Quikwriting: continuous stylus-based text entry. Proc. UIST (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ren, X., and Moriya, S. Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: a study of pen-based interaction for selection tasks. ACM TOCHI 7, 3 (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Roeber, H., Bacus, J., and Tomasi, C. Typing in thin air: the canesta projection keyboard -- a new method of interaction with electronic devices. Proc. CHI EA (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Roudaut, A., Huot, S., and Lecolinet, E. TapTap and MagStick: improving one-handed target acquisition on small touch-screens. Proc. AVI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sazawal, V., Want, R., and Borriello, G. The unigesture approach one-handed text entry for small devices. Proc. MobileHCI (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Soukoreff, R. W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Metrics for text entry research: An evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. Proc. CHI (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Soukoreff, R. W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Recent developments in text-entry error rate measurement. Proc. CHI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Vogel, D., and Baudisch, P. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proc. CHI (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wobbrock, J. O., and Myers, B. A. Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM TOCHI 13, 4 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proc. UIST (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Xiao, R., Laput, G., and Harrison, C. Expanding the input expressivity of smartwatches with mechanical pan, twist, tilt and click. Proc. CHI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yatani, K., Partridge, K., Bern, M., and Newman, M. Escape: a target selection technique using visually-cued gestures. Proc. CHI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Zhai, S., Hunter, M., and Smith, B. A. Performance optimization of virtual keyboards. Hum-Comput. Interact. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Zou, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., and Wang, K. Overlapped handwriting input on mobile phones. Proc. ICDAR (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!