Donor Retention in Online Crowdfunding Communities: A Case Study of DonorsChoose.org

ABSTRACT

Online crowdfunding platforms like DonorsChoose.org and Kickstarter allow specific projects to get funded by targeted contributions from a large number of people. Critical for the success of crowdfunding communities is recruitment and continued engagement of donors. With donor attrition rates above 70%, a significant challenge for online crowdfunding platforms as well as traditional offline non-profit organizations is the problem of donor retention. We present a large-scale study of millions of donors and donations on DonorsChoose.org, a crowdfunding platform for education projects. Studying an online crowdfunding platform allows for an unprecedented detailed view of how people direct their donations. We explore various factors impacting donor retention which allows us to identify different groups of donors and quantify their propensity to return for subsequent donations. We find that donors are more likely to return if they had a positive interaction with the receiver of the donation. We also show that this includes appropriate and timely recognition of their support as well as detailed communication of their impact. Finally, we discuss how our findings could inform steps to improve donor retention in crowdfunding communities and non-profit organizations.

References

1. A. K. Agrawal, C. Catalini, and A. Goldfarb. The geography of crowdfunding. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.
2. J. Arguello, B. S. Butler, E. Joyce, R. Kraut, K. S. Ling, C. Rosé, and X. Wang. Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In SIGCHI, 2006.
3. Association of Fundraising Professionals and the Urban Institute. Fundraising Effectiveness Project: 2013 Fundraising Effectiveness Survey Report. http://www.afpnet.org/files/ContentDocuments/FEP2013FinalReport.pdf, 2013.
4. P. Barber and B. Levis. Donor retention matters. Urban Institute: Center on Nonprofits and Philantrophy, 2013.
5. R. Bennett. Predicting the lifetime durations of donors to charities. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 15(1-2):45--67, 2006.
6. K. E. Boulding. The economy of love and fear: A preface to grants economics. Wadsworth Publishing Company Belmont, CA, 1973.
7. S. Ceyhan, X. Shi, and J. Leskovec. Dynamics of bidding in a P2P lending service: Effects of herding and predicting loan success. In WWW, 2011.
8. B. C. Collier and R. Hampshire. Sending mixed signals: Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets. In CSCW, 2010.
9. DonorsChoose.org. Impact. http://www.donorschoose.org/about/impact.html, 2014. Last retrieved on Nov 9, 2014.
10. G. Dror, D. Pelleg, O. Rokhlenko, and I. Szpektor. Churn prediction in new users of Yahoo! answers. In WWW, 2012.
11. M. Flannery. Kiva and the birth of person-to-person microfinance. Innovations, 2(1-2):31--56, 2007.
12. J. Goecks, A. Voida, S. Voida, and E. D. Mynatt. Charitable technologies: Opportunities for collaborative computing in nonprofit fundraising. In CSCW, 2008.
13. M. D. Greenberg, J. Hui, and E. Gerber. Crowdfunding: A resource exchange perspective. In CHI EA, 2013.
14. M. D. Greenberg, B. Pardo, K. Hariharan, and E. Gerber. Crowdfunding support tools: Predicting success & failure. In CHI EA, 2013.
15. A. Halfaker, R. S. Geiger, J. T. Morgan, and J. Riedl. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, 2012.
16. J. S. Hui, M. D. Greenberg, and E. M. Gerber. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In CSCW, 2014.
17. E. Joyce and R. E. Kraut. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3):723--747, 2006.
18. M. Karnstedt, M. Rowe, J. Chan, H. Alani, and C. Hayes. The effect of user features on churn in social networks. In WebSci, 2011.
19. V. Kuppuswamy and B. Bayus. Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in kickstarter. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013.
20. C. Lampe and E. Johnston. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In SIGGROUP, 2005.
21. Y. Liu, R. Chen, Y. Chen, Q. Mei, and S. Salib. I loan because...: Understanding motivations for pro-social lending. In WSDM, 2012.
22. J. Love. Low Donor Retention Takes More Than A Board Meeting To Solve. GuideStar Blog: http://trust.guidestar.org/2014/08/18/low-donor-retention-takes-more-than-a-board-meeting-to-solve/, 2014. Last retrieved on Nov 9, 2014.
23. C.-T. Lu, S. Xie, X. Kong, and P. S. Yu. Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. In WSDM, 2014.
24. K. MacLellan. Global Crowdfunding Volumes Rise 81% In 2012. Huffington Post, Aug 2013. Last retr. on Nov 9, 2014.
25. D. H. McKnight, V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar. The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4):297--323, 2002.
26. A. Merchant, J. B. Ford, and A. Sargeant. Don't forget to say thank you: The effect of an acknowledgement on donor relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7-8):593--611, 2010.
27. E. Mollick. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1):1 -- 16, 2014.
28. M. Muller, W. Geyer, T. Soule, and J. Wafer. Geographical and organizational distances in enterprise crowdfunding. In CSCW, 2014.
29. J. Naskrent and P. Siebelt. The influence of commitment, trust, satisfaction, and involvement on donor retention. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4):757--778, 2011.
30. J. S. Pudipeddi, L. Akoglu, and H. Tong. User churn in focused question answering sites: characterizations and prediction. In WWW Companion, 2014.
31. H. Rao, A. Xu, X. Yang, and W.-T. Fu. Emerging dynamics in crowdfunding campaigns. In Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, volume 8393 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 333--340. 2014.
32. D. N. Ritzenhein. Content analysis of fundraising letters. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 1998(22):23--36, 1998.
33. P. R. Rosenbaum. Design of Observational Studies. Springer, 2010.
34. A. Sargeant. Relationship fundraising: How to keep donors loyal. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2):177--192, 2001.
35. A. Sargeant. Donor retention: What do we know and what can we do about it? A Report for the Association of Fundraising Professionals, Washington DC, 2008.
36. A. Sargeant, J. B. Ford, and D. C. West. Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(2):155--165, 2006.
37. I. Veldhuizen. Thank you! please visit us again. reflecting on the donor retention literature--implications for retention practices. ISBT Science Series, 5(n1):196--200, 2010.
38. R. Wash. The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In Proc. ICWSM, 2013.
39. A. Xu, X. Yang, H. Rao, W.-T. Fu, S.-W. Huang, and B. P. Bailey. Show me the money!: An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In SIGCHI, 2014.
40. J. Yang, X. Wei, M. S. Ackerman, and L. A. Adamic. Activity lifespan: An analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In ICWSM, 2010.

Index Terms

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Data mining