Abstract
In wireless sensor networks, owing to the limited energy of the sensor node, it is very meaningful to propose a dynamic scheduling scheme with data management that reduces energy as soon as possible. However, traditional techniques treat data management as an isolated process on only selected individual nodes. In this article, we propose an aggressive data reduction architecture, which is based on error control within sensor segments and integrates three parallel dynamic control mechanisms. We demonstrate that this architecture not only achieves energy savings but also guarantees the data accuracy specified by the application. Furthermore, based on this architecture, we propose two implementations. The experimental results show that both implementations can raise the energy savings while keeping the error at an predefined and acceptable level. We observed that, compared with the basic implementation, the enhancement implementation achieves a relatively higher data accuracy. Moreover, the enhancement implementation is more suitable for the harsh environmental monitoring applications. Further, when both implementations achieve the same accuracy, the enhancement implementation saves more energy. Extensive experiments on realistic historical soil temperature data confirm the efficacy and efficiency of two implementations.
- C. Alippi, G. Anastasi, C. Galperti, F. Mancini, and M. Roveri. 2007. Adaptive sampling for energy conservation in wireless sensor networks for snow monitoring applications. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS’07).Google Scholar
- A. Boulis, S. Ganeriwal, and M.B. Srivastava. 2003. Aggregation in sensor networks: An energy-accuracy trade-off. Ad Hoc Networks 1, 2 (2003), 317--331.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Carvalho, D. G. Gomes, N. Agoulmine, and J. N. De Souza. 2011. Improving prediction accuracy for WSN data reduction by applying multivariate spatio-temporal correlation. Sensors 11, 11 (2011), 10010--10037.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Cerpa, J. Elson, D. Estrin, L. Girod, M. Hamilton, and J. Zhao. 2001. Habitat monitoring: Application driver for wireless communications technology. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Data Communications in Latin America and the Caribbean (SIGCOMM LA’01). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Chu and A. Deshpande. 2006. Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’06). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Goel and T. Imielinski. 2001. Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: Taking lessons from MPEG. ACM Computer Communication Review 31, 5 (2001), 82--98. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Q. Han, S. Mehrotra, and N. Venkatasubramanian. 2004. Energy efficient data collection in distributed sensor environments. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’04). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. J. Hopfield. 1988. Artificial neural networks. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine 4, 5 (1988), 3--10.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- X. Huang, J. Ma, and L. E. Lawrence. 2004. Wireless sensor network for streetlight monitoring and control. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Digital Wireless Communication.Google Scholar
- A Hui and L Cui. 2007. Forecast-based temporal data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Computer Engineering and Applications 42, 21 (2007), 121--125.Google Scholar
- T. Imielinski and S. Goel. 1999. DataSpace - querying and monitoring deeply networked collections in physical space. In Proceedings of the Intentional Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access (MobiDE’99). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. 2000. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM’02). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. D. Kandlur, K. G. Shin, and D. Ferrari. 1994. Real-time communication in multi-hop networks. IEEE Transaction on Parallel and Distributed Systems 5, 10 (1994), 1044--1056. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- T. Kijewski-Correa, M. Haenggi, and P. Antsaklis. 2006. Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring: A multi-scale approach. In Proceedings of the 2006 ASCE Structures Congress.Google Scholar
- V. Kottapalli, A. Kiremidjian, J. Lynch, E. Carryer, T. Kenny, K. Law, and Y. Lei. 2003. Two-tiered wireless sensor network architecture for structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials.Google Scholar
- J. Kulik, W. R. Heinzelman, and H. Balakrishnan. 2002. Negotiation-based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks 8 (2002), 169--185. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Lee and V. W. S. Wong. 2005. An energy-aware spanning tree algorithm for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PacRim’05).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. 2002. TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 36, SI (2002), 131--146. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J. Anderson. 2002. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA’02). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- T. B. Matos, A. Brayner, and J. E. B. Maia. 2010. Towards in-network data prediction in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’10). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- E. J. Msechu and G. B. Giannakis. 2012. Sensor-centric data reduction for estimation with WSNs via censoring and quantization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 60, 1 (2012), 400--414. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- N. A. Pantazis and D. D. Vergados. 2007. A survey on power control issues in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 9, 4 (2007), 86--107. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. Pottie and W. Kaiser. 2000. Wireless integrated network sensors. Communication of ACM 43, 5 (2000), 51--58. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. S. Pradhan and K. Ramchandran. 2003. Distributed source coding using syndromes (DISCUS): Design and construction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 49, 3 (2003), 626--643. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Q. Qiu, Q. Wu, D. Burns, and D. Holzhauer. 2006. Lifetime aware resource management for sensor network using distributed genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED’06). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- V. Raghunathan, C. Schurgers, S. Park, and M. B. Srivastava. 2002. Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19, 2 (2002), 40--50.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Rumelhart and J. McClelland. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- S. Santini and K. Romer. 2006. An adaptive strategy for quality-based data reduction in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS’06).Google Scholar
- S. Seo, J. Kang, and K. H. Ryu. 2005. Multivariate stream data reduction in sensor network applications. In Proceedings of Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing Workshops (EUC’05). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- O. Silva, A. L. L. Aquino, R. A. F. Mini, and C. M. S. Figueiredo. 2009. Multivariate reduction in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC’09).Google Scholar
- I. Solis and K. Obraczka. 2006. In-network aggregation trade-offs for data collection in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks 1, 3 (2006), 200--212. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Tang and C. S. Raghavendra. 2004. Compression techniques for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensor Networks (2004), 207--231. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. C. Vuran, O. B. Akan, and I. F. Akyildiz. 2004. Spatio-temporal correlation: Theory and applications for wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks Journal 45, 3 (2004), 245--259. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Z. Xiong, A. D. Liveris, and S. Cheng. 2004. Distributed source coding for sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 21, 5 (2004), 80--94.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Y. Xu and W.-C. Lee. 2003. On localized prediction for power efficient object tracking in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCS’03). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Q. Zhang, Y. Gu, L. Gu, Q. Cao, and T. He. 2011. Collaborative scheduling in highly dynamic environments using error inference. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MASS’11). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- T. Zheng, S. Radhakrishnan, and V. Sarangan. 2005. Pmac: An adaptive energyefficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS’05). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Zhou and D. De Roure. 2007. FloodNet:Coupling adaptive sampling with energy aware routing in a flood warning system. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 22, 1 (2007), 121--130. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Cooperative Data Reduction in Wireless Sensor Network
Recommendations
Energy and RSSI based fuzzy inference system for cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks
ICICT '19: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication TechnologyWireless sensor network (WSN) composes of randomly and uniformly deployed sensors to sense and monitor condition changing e.g. temperature and pass the data to a base station. As sensor node operates on a limited power battery where it is difficult to ...
Load balancing techniques for lifetime maximizing in wireless sensor networks
Energy consumption has been the focus of many studies on Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). It is well recognized that energy is a strictly limited resource in WSNs. This limitation constrains the operation of the sensor nodes and somehow compromises the ...
Energy-Efficient Cluster-Head Selection Based on a Fuzzy Expert System in Wireless Sensor Networks
GREENCOM '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Green Computing and CommunicationsEnergy efficiency is a key issue in the design of wireless sensor networking systems because each sensor node carries power source of limited capacity and cannot be easily replaced. To achieve high energy efficiency, a typical approach is to cluster the ...






Comments