10.1145/2788940.2788942acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessuiConference Proceedings
research-article

Comparison of Device-Based, One and Two-Handed 7DOF Manipulation Techniques

ABSTRACT

We evaluate three bimanual 7 degree-of-freedom (7DOF) object manipulation techniques that use a pair of precision grasped isotonic devices called buttonballs. 7DOF manipulation means changing position, orientation and scale. We compare the techniques in a (stereo) Fish-tank Virtual Reality (VR) system. The user study displays multiple randomly located boxes of different sizes and the user must dock (i.e. align) each target box with an objective box at the screen center. Comparing task completion times shows that in cases where target and objective boxes are the same size, all three techniques perform equivalently. When the sizes differ--requiring a scale change--two of the technique's, Spindle+Wheel and a minor variant of Grab-and-Scale perform similarly, and are both faster than the third technique, One-Hand+Scale. We compare and contrast our results with other work including free-hand versus held device input and also with 7DOF object manipulation versus 7DOF view manipulation.

References

  1. Bowman, Doug A., Kruijff, Ernst, LaViola, Joseph J., and Poupyrev, Ivan. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison Wesley, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, Michelle A., Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang, and Filho, E. J. Mendonć. The Performance of Uninstrumented Inair Pointing. In Proceedings of the 2014 Graphics Interface Conference (Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada 2014), Canadian Information Processing Society, 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cho, Isaac. Bimanual Stereoscopic Interaction for 3D Visualization. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho, Isaac. and Wartell, Zachary. Evaluation of a Bimanual Simultaneous 7DOF Interaction Technique in Virtual Environments. (Arles, France 2015), 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2015 IEEE Symposium on.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutler, Lawrence D., Froehlich, Bernd, and Hanrahan, Pat. Two-handed direct manipulation on the responsive workbench. In Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics (1997), ACM Press, 107--ff. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Deering, Michael. High resolution virtual reality. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 26, 2 (1992), 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Guiard, Yves. Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19 (1987), 486--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jacob, Robert J. K., Sibert, Linda E., McFarlane, Daniel C., and Mullen, Jr., M. Preston. Integrality and Separability of Input Devices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 1, 1 (March 1994), 3--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mapes, Daniel P. and Moshell, J. Michael. A Two Handed Interface for Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments. Presence, 4, 4 (1995), 403--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Masliah, Maurice R and Milgram, Paul. Measuring the allocation of control in a 6 degree-of-freedom docking experiment. (2000), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. McCully, Sean P., Kumar, Naveen, Lazarus, Mark D., and Karduna, Andrew R. Internal and external rotation of the shoulder: Effects of plane, end-range determination, and scapular motion. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14, 6 (2005), 602--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mendes, Daniel and Fonseca, Fernando and Araujo, Bruno and Ferreira, Alfredo and Jorge, Joaquim. Mid-air interactions above stereoscopic interactive tables. (2014), 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2014 IEEE Symposium on.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moehring, M. and Froehlich, B. Effective manipulation of virtual objects within arm's reach. In Virtual Reality Conference (VR), 2011 IEEE ( 2011), 131--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul Mlyniec, Jason Jerald, Arun Yoganandan F. Jacob Seagull Fernando Toledo Udo Schultheis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinett, Warren and Holloway, Richard. Implementation of flying, scaling and grabbing in virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics (1992), ACM Press, 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shaw, Chris and Green, Mark. Two-handed polygonal surface design. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (1994), 205--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Song, Peng, Goh, Wooi Boon, Hutama, William, Fu, Chi-Wing, and Liu, Xiaopei. A handle bar metaphor for virtual object manipulation with mid-air interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012), 1297--1306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Suma, Evan. osgVirtualEnvironment. http://sourceforge.net/projects/osgveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor II, Russell M., Hudson, Thomas C., Seeger, Adam, Weber, Hans, Juliano, Jeffrey, and Helser, Aron T. VRPN: a device-independent, network-transparent VR peripheral system. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology (New York, NY, USA 2001), ACM, 55--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ulinski, Amy, Zanbaka, Catherine, Wartell, Zachary, Goolkasian, Paula, and Hodges, Larry F. Two handed selection techniques for volumetric data. In 3D User Interfaces, 2007. 3DUI'07. IEEE Symposium on (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, Robert, Paris, Sylvain, and Popovic, Jovan. 6D hands: markerless hand-tracking for computer aided design. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (New York, NY, USA 2011), ACM, 549--558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ware, Colin, Gobrecht, Cyril, and Paton, Mark Andrew. Dynamic Adjustment of Stereo Display Parameters. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 28, 1 (January 1998), 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ware, Colin and Jessome, Danny R. Using the bat: A sixdimensional mouse for object placement. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 8, 6 (1988), 65--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wartell, Zachary, Hodges, Larry, and Ribarsky, William. Third-Person Navigation of Whole-Planet Terrain in a Head-Tracked Stereoscopic Environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality '99 Conference (March 1999), IEEE Computer Society Press, 141--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhai, Shumin. Investigation of feel for 6DOF inputs: isometric and elastic rate control for manipulation in 3D environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (1993), 323--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Supplemental Material

sui0109-file3.mp4

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of Device-Based, One and Two-Handed 7DOF Manipulation Techniques

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!