skip to main content
research-article

Extracting Arabic Causal Relations Using Linguistic Patterns

Published:08 March 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Identifying semantic relations is a crucial step in discourse analysis and is useful for many applications in both language and speech technology. Automatic detection of Causal relations therefore has gained popularity in the literature within different frameworks. The aim of this article is the automatic detection and extraction of Causal relations that are explicitly expressed in Arabic texts. To fulfill this goal, a Pattern Recognizer model was developed to signal the presence of cause--effect information within sentences from nonspecific domain texts. This model incorporates approximately 700 linguistic patterns so that parts of the sentence representing the cause and those representing the effect can be distinguished. The patterns were constructed based on different sets of syntactic features by analyzing a large untagged Arabic corpus. In addition, the model was boosted with three independent algorithms to deal with certain types of grammatical particles that indicate causation. With this approach, the proposed model achieved an overall recall of 81% and a precision of 78%. Evaluation results revealed that the justification particles play a key role in detecting Causal relations. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have been dedicated to dealing with this type of relation in the Arabic language.

References

  1. Lahsen Abouenour, Karim Bouzoubaa, and Paolo Rosso. 2013. On the evaluation and improvement of Arabic WordNet coverage and usability. Language Resources and Evaluation 47, 3, 891--917. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammad Al-Jarrah. 2011. Arabic newspapers discourse: Rhetorical features, discourse markers, strategies and organization. Damascus University Journal 27, 3, 207--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengt Altenberg. 1984. Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistic 38, 1, 20--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brandon Beamer, Suma Bhat, Brant Chee, Andrew Fister, Alla Rozovskaya, and Roxana Girju. 2007. UIUC: A knowledge-rich approach to identifying semantic relations between nominal. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 386--389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brandon Beamer, Suma Bhat, Brant Chee, Andrew Fister, Rozovskaya Alla, and Roxana Girju. 2007. UIUC: A knowledge-rich approach to identifying semantic relations between nominals. In Proceedings of the 4th Interaction Workshop on Semantic Evaluations. 386--389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eduardo Blancol, Nuria Castell, and Dan Moldovan. 2008. Causal relation extraction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). 310--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniela Carcia. 1997. COATIS, an NLP system to locate expressions of actions connected by Causality Links. In Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, 345--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Claire Cardie. 1997. Empirical methods in information extraction. Al Magazine, 18, 4, 65--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jim Cowie and Wendy Lehnert. 1996. Information extraction. Communications of the ACM, 29, 1, 80--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Quang Do, Yee Chan, and Dan Roth. 2011. Minimally supervised event causality identification. In Proceedings of EMNLP’11, 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Roxana Girju. 2003. Automatic detection of causal relations for question answering. In ACL 2003 Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering, 76--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Roxana Girju and Dan Moldovan. 2002. Mining answers for causation questions. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)-Spring Symposium, 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Renison Gonsalves. 1986. A decompositional analysis of causative verbs. CUNYforum, 12, 31--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Spence Green and Christopher Manning. 2010. Better Arabic parsing: baseline, evaluations, and analysis. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 395--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nadia Haskour. 1990. Al-Sababieh fe tarkeb Al-Jumlah Al-Arabih. Master's thesis, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nadia Haskour. 2009. Al-Adwat Al-Nahawya fe Mughne Al-labib Lebn Hesham, Dar Al-Furqan Press, Syria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Basil Hatim. 1997. Communication Across Cultures: Translation Theory and Contrastive Text Linguistics. University of Exeter Press, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ashwin Ittoo and Gosse Bouma. 2011. Extracting explicit and implicit causal relations from sparse, domain-specific texts. In R. Muñoz, A. Montoyo, and E. Métais (Eds.). NLDB 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6716, Springer, Berlin, 52--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Peter Jackson. 1989. Application of nonmonotonic logic to diagnosis. The Knowledge Engineering Review 4, 2, 97--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Leo Joskowsicz, Tomasz Ksiezyk, and Ralph Crishman. 1989. Deep domain models for discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the Annual AI Systems in Government Conference, 195--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Helene Kammensjo. 2010. Discourse connectives in Arabic lecturing monologue. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 69, 1, 143--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Randy Kaplan and Genevieve Berry-Rogghe. 1991. Knowledge-based acquisition of causal relationships in text. Knowledge Acquisition 3, 3, 317--337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Christopher Khoo, Jaklin Knornfilt, Sung Myaeng, and Robert Oddy. 1998. Automatic extraction of cause--effect information from newspaper text without knowledge-based inferencing. Literary and Linguistic Computing 13, 4, 177--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Christopher Khoo, Syin Chan, and Yun Niu. 2000. Extracting causal knowledge from a medical database using graphical patterns. In Proceedings of 38th Annual Meeting of the ACL. 336--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Leah Larkey, Lisa Ballesteros, and Margaret Connell. 2002. Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: Light stemming and co-occurrence analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’02). 275--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Boon-Toh Low, Ki Chan, Lei-Lei Choi, Man-Yee Chin, and Sin-Ling Lay. 2001. Semantic expectation-based causation knowledge extraction: A study on Hong Kong stock movement analysis. In David Cheung, Graham J. Williams, and Qing Li (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 2035, Springer, Berlin, 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Chaveevan Pechsiri and Asanee Kawtrakul. 2007. Mining causality from texts for question answering system. IELCE Transactions on Information and Systems, E90-D, 10, 1523--1533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rashmi Prasad and Aravind Joshi. 2008. A discourse-based approach to generating why-questions from text. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge. Arlington, VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cristina Puente, Alejandro Sobrino, and Jose Angel Olivas. 2011. Retrieving crisp and imperfect causal sentences in texts: From single causal sentences to mechanisms. In Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences. 175--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bryan Rink, Cosmin Bejan, and Sanda Harabagiu. 2010. Learning textual graph patterns to detect causal event relations. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 265--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jawad Sadek, Fairouz Chakkour, and Farid Meziane. 2012. Arabic rhetorical relations extraction for answering “Why” and “How to” questions. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Application of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB’12). 385--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Aziz Saeed and Sheheh Fareh. 2006. Difficulties encountered by bilingual Arab learner in translating Arabic “fa” into English. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9, 1, 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lea Sarig. 1995. Discourse markers in contemporary Arabic. Zeitschrift fur Arabische Linguistik, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. 7--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North America Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 1. 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Suzan Verberne, Lou Boves, Peter-Arno Coppen, and Nelleke Osstdijk. 2007. Discourse-based answering of why-questions. Traitement Automatiques des Langues, Special Issue on Computational Approaches to Document and Discourse 47, 2, 21--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. William Wright and Carl Caspari. 1896. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lotfi Zadeh. 2006. From search engines to question-answering systems: The problem of world knowledge, relevance, deduction, and precisiation. In Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web. 163--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Extracting Arabic Causal Relations Using Linguistic Patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!