Aaron W. F. Lee
- 1.BAJAJ, C. L., BERNADINI, F., CHEN, J., AND SCHIKORE, D. R. Automatic Reconstruction of 3D CAD Models. Tech. Rep. 96-015, Purdue University, February 1996.Google Scholar
- 2.BROWN, P. J. C., AND FAIGLE, C. T. A Robust Efficient Algorithm for Point Location in Triangulations. Tech. rep., Cambridge University, February 1997.Google Scholar
- 3.CERTAIN, A., POPOVld, J., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T., SALESIN, D., AND STUETZLE, W. Interactive Multiresolution Surface Viewing. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 96 P1vceedings), 91-98, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.COHEN, J., MANOCHA, D., AND OLANO, M. Simplifying Polygonal Models Using Successive Mappings. In Proceedings IEEE Visualization 97, 395-402, October 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.DOBKIN, D., AND KIRKPATRICK, D. A Linear Algorithm for Determining the Separation of Convex Polyhedra. Journal of Algorithms 6 (1985), 381-392.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6.DUCHAMP, T., CERTAIN, A., DEROSE, T., AND STUETZLE, W. Hierarchical Computation of PL harmonic Embeddings. Tech. rep., University of Washington, July 1997.Google Scholar
- 7.ECK, M., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T., HOPPE, H., LOUNSBERY, M., AND STUETZLE, W. Multiresolution Analysis of Arbitrary Meshes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 95 P1vceedings), 173-182, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.ECK, M., AND HOPPE, H. Automatic Reconstruction of B-Spline Surfaces of Arbitrary Topological Type. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 96 P1vceedings), 325-334, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.GARLAND, M., AND HECKBERT, P. S. Fast Polygonal Approximation of Terrains and Height Fields. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-95-181, CS Dept., Carnegie Mellon U., September 1995.Google Scholar
- 10.GUIBAS, L., AND STOLFI, J. Primitives for the Manipulation of General Subdivisions and the Computation of Voronoi Diagrams. ACM Transactions on Graphics 4, 2 (April 1985), 74-123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.HECKBERT, P. S., AND GARLAND, M. Survey of Polygonal Surface Simplification Algorithms. Tech. rep., Camegie Mellon University, 1997.Google Scholar
- 12.HOPPE, H. Progressive Meshes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 96 P1vceedings), 99-108, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.HOPPE, H. View-Dependent Refinement of Progressive Meshes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 97 P1vceedings), 189-198, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.HOPPE, H., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T., HALSTEAD, M., JIN, H., MCDON- ALD, J., SCHWEITZER, J., AND STUETZLE, W. Piecewise Smooth Surface Reconstruction. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 94 Proceedings), 295-302, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.KIRKPATRICK, D. Optimal Search in Planar Subdivisions. SIAMJ. Comput. 12 (1983), 28-35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.KLEIN, A., CERTAIN, A., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T., AND STUETZLE, W. Vertex-based Delaunay Triangulation of Meshes of Arbitrary Topological Type. Tech. rep., University of Washington, July 1997.Google Scholar
- 17.KRISHNAMURTHY, V., AND LEVOY, M. Fitting Smooth Surfaces to Dense Polygon Meshes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 96 P1vceedings), 313- 324, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.LOOP, C. Smooth Subdivision Surfaces Based on Triangles. Master's thesis, University of Utah, Department of Mathematics, 1987.Google Scholar
- 19.LOUNSBERY, M. Multiresolution Analysis for Sulfaces of Arbitrary Topological Type. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Washington, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.LOUNSBERY, M., DEROSE, T., AND WARREN, J. Multiresolution Analysis for Surfaces of Arbitrary Topological Type. Transactions on Graphics 16, 1 (January 1997), 34-73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.M~CKE, E.P. Shapes and Implementations in Three-Dimensional Geometry. Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-93-1836, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, 1993. Google Scholar
- 22.SCHRODER, P., AND SWELDENS, W. Spherical Wavelets: Efficiently Representing Functions on the Sphere. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 95 P~vceedings), Annual Conference Series, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.SCHWEITZER, J. E. Analysis and Application of Subdivision Sulfaces. PhD thesis, University of Washington, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.SPANIER, E. H. Algebraic Topology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- 25.XIA, J. C., AND VARSHNEY, A. Dynamic View-Dependent Simplification for Polygonal Models. In P~vceedings Visualization 96, 327-334, October 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.ZORIN, D. Subdivision and Multiresolution Smface Representations. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.ZORIN, D., SCHRODER, P., AND SWELDENS, W. Interpolating Subdivision for Meshes with Arbitrary Topology. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 96 P1vceedings), 189-192, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.ZORIN, D., SCHRODER, P., AND SWELDENS, W. Interactive Multiresolution Mesh Editing. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 97 P1vceedings), 259-268, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
MAPS: multiresolution adaptive parameterization of surfaces
Recommendations
Using Most Isometric Parametrizations for Remeshing Polygonal Surfaces
GMP '00: Proceedings of the Geometric Modeling and Processing 2000The importance of triangle meshes with a special kind of connectivity, the so-called subdivision connectivity is still growing. Therefore it is important to develop efficient algorithms for converting a given mesh with arbitrary connectivity into one ...
Transforming 3D mesh surfaces into images by parameterization
Integrated image and graphics technologiesThis chapter addresses the problem of mesh parameterization for transforming 3D mesh surfaces into images. We begin with a survey of the algorithms for parameterizing a chart, a simply connected mesh isomorphic to a topological disk, into a 2D domain ...
End-to-End GPU-Accelerated Low-Poly Remeshing using Curvature Map and Voronoi Tessellation✱
ICVGIP '22: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image ProcessingWe propose a novel algorithm for low-poly remeshing of 3D surfaces that runs fully in GPU. Since the input mesh is generally not well-organized, performing mesh simplification directly on the input mesh is liable to produce a low-poly mesh with a ...
Comments