10.1145/2817721.2817743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedings
research-article
Best Paper

Blind People Interacting with Large Touch Surfaces: Strategies for One-handed and Two-handed Exploration

ABSTRACT

Interaction with large touch surfaces is still a relatively infant domain, particularly when looking at the accessibility solutions offered to blind users. Their smaller mobile counterparts are shipped with built-in accessibility features, enabling non-visual exploration of linearized screen content. However, it is unknown how well these solutions perform in large interactive surfaces that use more complex spatial content layouts. We report on a user study with 14 blind participants performing common touchscreen interactions using one and two-hand exploration. We investigate the exploration strategies applied by blind users when interacting with a tabletop. We identified six basic strategies that were commonly adopted and should be considered in future designs. We finish with implications for the design of accessible large touch interfaces.

References

  1. Anthony, L. et al. 2013. Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2013), 1223--1232. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Azenkot, S., et al. 201 Input finger detection for nonvisual touch screen text entry in Perkinput. Proc. of GI '12, ACM (2012), 121--129. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertelson, P., et al.. (1985). A study of braille reading: 2. Patterns of hand activity in one-handed and two-handed reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(2), 235--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonner, M. et al. 2010 No-Look Notes: Accessible Eyes-Free Multitouch Text-Entry. Proc. Pervasive '10, Springer (2010), 409--427. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock, A., et al. 2012. Kin'touch: understanding how visually impaired people explore tactile maps. In CHI Extended Abstracts, ACM (2012), 2471--2476. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock, A., et al. 2015. Interactivity Improves Usability of Geographic Maps for Visually Impaired People. Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 156--194. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brock, A., et al. 2013. Map design for visually impaired people: past, present, and future research. Médiation et Information-Handicap et Communication, 36, 117--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner, J., and Bulatov, V. 2006. Scientific Diagrams Made Easy with IVEO. Proc. of ICCHP, (2006) 1243--1250. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Giudice, N. et al. 2012. Learning non-visual graphical information using a touch-based vibro-audio interface. Proc. of ASSETS, ACM (2012), 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goncu C., and Marriot K. 2011. Gravvitas: generic multitouch presentation of accessible graphics. Proc. of INTERACT, (2011), 30--48. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 1Guerreiro, J., Gonçalves, D. 2014. Text-to-Speeches: Evaluating the Perception of Concurrent Speech by Blind People. Proc. of ASSETS, ACM (2014),169--176. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Guerreiro, T. et al. 2008. A. From tapping to touching: Making touch screens accessible to blind users. IEEE Multimedia, 15, 4 (2008), 48--50. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Guerreiro, J., et al. 2015. TabLETS Get Physical: Non-Visual Text Entry on Tablet Devices. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2015), 39--42. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hatwell, Y., et al.. (2003). Touching for knowing: cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception (Vol. 53). John Benjamins Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane, S., et al 2008. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proc. of ASSETS, ACM (2008). 73--80, Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kane, S. K., et al.. 2011. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. Proc. of CHI. ACM (2011), 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kane, S., et al. 2011. Access overlays: improving non-visual access to large touch screens for blind users. Proc. UIST, ACM (2011), 273--282. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Manshad, M., Manshad, A. 2008. Multimodal Vision Glove for Touchscreens. Proc. of ASSETS, ACM (2008), 251--252. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicolau, H., et al. 2014. B#: chord-based correction for multitouch braille input. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2014), 1705--1708. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nunes, R., et al. 2015.TACTIC: An API for Touch and Tangible Interaction. Proc. of TEI, ACM (2015), 125--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 2Oliveira, J., et al. 2011. Blind people and mobile touch-based text-entry: acknowledging the need for different flavors. Proc. of ASSETS, ACM (2011), 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 2Parkes, D. 1988. "NOMAD":An audio-tactile tool for the acquisition, use and management of spatially distributed information by partially sighted and blind persons. Proc. of International Conference on Maps and Graphics for Visually Disabled People (1988), 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sauro, J., & Dumas, J. S. 2009. Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2009), 1599--1608. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Southern, C. et al. 2012. An evaluation of BrailleTouch mobile touchscreen text entry for the visually impaired. Proc. of MobileHCI, ACM (2012), 317--326. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thinus-Blanc, C., & Gaunet, F. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychological Bulletin, 121, 1 (1997), 20--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Blind People Interacting with Large Touch Surfaces

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!