Algorithmic Authority: the Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Algorithms that Interpret, Decide, and Manage

ABSTRACT

This panel will explore algorithmic authority as it manifests and plays out across multiple domains. Algorithmic authority refers to the power of algorithms to manage human action and influence what information is accessible to users. Algorithms increasingly have the ability to affect everyday life, work practices, and economic systems through automated decision-making and interpretation of "big data". Cases of algorithmic authority include algorithmically curating news and social media feeds, evaluating job performance, matching dates, and hiring and firing employees. This panel will bring together researchers of quantified self, healthcare, digital labor, social media, and the sharing economy to deepen the emerging discourses on the ethics, politics, and economics of algorithmic authority in multiple domains.

References

1. Taina Bucher. 2012. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 7: 1164-1180.
2. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi. 2014. Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines. First Monday 19, 6.
3. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, et al. 2015. "I Always Assumed That I Wasn't Really That Close to {Her}": Reasoning About Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 153-162.
4. Lilly Irani. 2015. The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society 17, 5: 720-739.
5. Jannis Kallinikos. 2012. Form, function, and matter: Crossing the border of materiality. In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Paul M. Leonardi and Bonnie A. Nardi (eds.). OUP Oxford, 67-87.
6. Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1603-1612.
7. Caitlin Lustig and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic Authority: The Case of Bitcoin. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 743-752.
8. Dawn Nafus and Jamie Sherman. 2014. This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication 8, 0: 11.
9. Frank Pasquale. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
10. Kathleen Pine and Melissa Mazmanian. 2015. Emerging Insights on Building Infrastructure for Data-Driven Transparency and Accountability of Organizations. Proceedings of the iConference 2015.
11. Michael Sauder and Wendy Nelson Espeland. 2009. The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review 74, 1: 63-82.
12. Susan V. Scott and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2012. Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37, 1: 26-40.
13. Zeynep Tufekci. 2015. Algorithmic Harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal 13: 203.
14. Malte Ziewitz. 2016. Governing Algorithms Myth, Mess, and Methods. Science, Technology & Human Values 41, 1: 3-16.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy