research-article

Far but Near or Near but Far?: The Effects of Perceived Distance on the Relationship between Geographic Dispersion and Perceived Diversity

Author:

Lionel P. RobertAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 2461 - 2473

https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858534

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Geographic dispersion has been proposed as one means to promote cooperation and coordination in teams high in perceived diversity. However, research has found mixed support for this assertion. This study proposes that the inclusion of perceived distance helps to explain these mixed results. To test this assertion, we examined 121 teams-62 collocated and 59 geographically dispersed. Results demonstrate that perceived distance explains when geographic dispersion benefits teams high in perceived diversity. Results also indicate that the type of perceived diversity matters (surface-level vs. deep-level diversity). This study contributes to our understanding of distance and diversity in teams.

References

[1]

F. Pincar Acer. 2010. Analyzing the effects of diversity perceptions and shared leadership on emotional conflict: A dynamic approach. Int J Hum Res Manage 21, 10: 1733--1753.

[2]

Lillemor Adrianson. 2001. Gender and computermediated communication: Group processes in problem solving. Comp Hum Behav 17, 1: 71--94.

[3]

Leona S. Aiken and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 132--136.

[4]

Petra Saskia Bayerl and Kristina Lauche. 2008. Coordinating high-interdependency tasks in asymmetric distributed teams. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 417--426.

Digital Library

[5]

Anita D. Bhappu, Terri L. Griffith, Gregory B. Northcraft. 1997. Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organ Behav Hum Dec 70, 3: 199--205.

[6]

Pernille Bjørn, Morten Esbensen, Rasmus Eskild Jensen, Stina Matthiesen. 2014. Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM T Comput-Hum Int 21, 5: 27.

Digital Library

[7]

Paul D. Bliese. 2000. Within-group agreement, nonindependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, Katherine J. Klein and Steve W. J. Kozlowski (eds.) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 349--381.

[8]

Nathan D. Bos, Ayse Buyuktur, Judith S. Olson, Gary M. Olson, Amy Voida. 2010. Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 89--96.

Digital Library

[9]

Erin Bradner and Gloria Mark. 2002. Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 226--235.

Digital Library

[10]

Marilynn B. Brewer. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol Bull 86, 2: 307.

[11]

Kristen Byron. 2008. Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Acad Manage Rev 33, 2: 309--327.

[12]

Michael A. Campion, Ellen M., Papper, Gina J. Medsker. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Pers Psychol 49, 429--452.

[13]

Traci Carte and Laku Chidambaram. 2004. A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. J Assoc Inform Syst 5, 11: 4.

[14]

Andrew M. Carton and J. N. Cummings. 2012. A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad Manage Rev 37, 4: 441--470.

[15]

Joseph Cesario and Carlos David Navarrete. 2014. Perceptual bias in threat distance the critical roles of ingroup support and target evaluations in defensive threat regulation. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 5, 1: 12--17.

[16]

Myungsuk Cha, Jun-Gi Park, Jungwoo Lee. 2014. Effects of team member psychological proximity on teamwork performance. Team Perform Manage 20, ½: 81--96.

[17]

Jennifer A. Chatman. 2010. Norms in mixed sex and mixed race work groups. Acad Manage Ann 4, 1: 447--484.

[18]

Kristina B. Dahlin, Laurie R. Weingart, Pamela J. Hinds. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Acad Manage J 48, 6: 1107--1123.

[19]

Alan R Dennis. 1996. Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quart 20, 4: 433--457.

Digital Library

[20]

Stacy T. Kowalczyk, Bryan K. Hasty. 2012. Research note Trust Is in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study of postevent behavioral controls' effects on individual trust in virtual teams. Information Systems Research 23, 2: 546--558.

Digital Library

[21]

E. Ilana Diamant, Susan R. Fussell, Fen-ly Lo. 2008. Where did we turn wrong?: Unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 383--392.

Digital Library

[22]

Janice L. Dreachslin, Portia L. Hunt, Elaine Sprainer. 2000. Workforce Diversity: Implications for the effectiveness of health care delivery teams. Soc Sci Med 50, 10: 1403--1414

[23]

Claes Fornell and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res, 18, 1: 39--50.

[24]

Gary Garrison, Robin L. Wakefield, Xiaobo Xu, Sang Hyun Kim. 2010. Globally distributed teams: The effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance. ACM SIGMIS Database 41, 3: 27--48.

Digital Library

[25]

Robert C. Giambatista and Anita D. Bhappu. 2010. Diversity's harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creative group performance. Organ Behav Hum Dec 111, 2: 116--126.

[26]

Cristina B. Gibson and Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2006. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin Sci Quart 51, 3: 451--495.

[27]

Sandeep Goyal, Likoebe Maruping, and Lionel Robert. 2008. Diversity and conflict in teams: A faultline model perspective. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 1--6.

[28]

Raja Gumienny, Lutz Gericke, Matthias Wenzel, Christoph Meinel. 2013. Supporting creative collaboration in globally distributed companies. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 995--1007.

Digital Library

[29]

David A. Harrison, Kenneth H. Price, Joanne H. Gavin, Anna T. Florey. 2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deeplevel diversity on group functioning. Acad Manage J 45, 5: 1029--1045.

[30]

Tanja Hentschel, Meir Shemla, JürgenWegge, Eric Kearney. 2013. Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Gr Res 44, 33--61.

[31]

Pamela J. Hinds and Diane E. Bailey. 2003. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ Sci 14, 6: 615--632.

Digital Library

[32]

Pamela J. Hinds and Mark Mortensen. 2005. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ Sci 16, 3: 290--307.

Digital Library

[33]

Elizabeth V. Hobman, Prashant Bordia, Cynthia Gallois. 2004. Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group Organ Manage 29, 5: 560--587.

[34]

Martin Hoegl, Katharina Weinkauf, Hans Georg Gemuenden. 2004. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ Sci 15, 1: 38--55.

Digital Library

[35]

Astrid C. Homan, Daan Van Knippenberg, Gerben A. Van Kleef, Carsten K.W. De Dreu. 2007. Bridging fault lines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J Appl Psychol 92, 5: 1189.

[36]

Karen A. Jehn, Gregory B. Northcraft, Margaret A. Neale (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin Sci Quart 44, 741--763.

[37]

Aparna Joshi, Mila B. Lazarova, Hui Liao. 2009. Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organ Sci 20, 1: 240--252.

Digital Library

[38]

Benjamin Koehne, Patrick C. Shih, Judith S. Olson. 2012. Remote and alone: Coping with being the remote member on the team. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 1257--1266.

Digital Library

[39]

Dora C. Lau, J. Keith Murnighan. 1998. Demographic diversity and fault lines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manage Rev 23, 2: 325--340.

[40]

Dora C. Lau and J. Keith Murnighan. 2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic fault lines. Acad Manage J 48, 4: 645659.

[41]

Charlotte P. Lee and Drew Paine. 2015. From the matrix to a model of coordinated action (MoCA): A conceptual framework of and for CSCW. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, 179--194.

Digital Library

[42]

Min Kyung Lee, Nathaniel Fruchter, Laura Dabbish. 2015. Making decisions from a distance: The impact of technological mediation on riskiness and dehumanization. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, 1576--1589.

Digital Library

[43]

Jiatao Li Donald C. Hambrick. 2005. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic fault lines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad Manage J 48, 5: 794--813.

[44]

Luis L. Martins, Frances J. Milliken, Batia M. Wiesenfeld, Susan R. Salgado. 2003. Racioethnic diversity and group members' experiences: The role of the racioethnic diversity of the organizational context. Group Organ Manage 28, 75

[45]

Sean A. Munson, Karina Kervin, Lionel P. Robert Jr. 2014. Monitoring email to indicate project team performance and mutual attraction. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, ACM, 542--549.

Digital Library

[46]

Seongtaek Lim, Sang Yun Cha, Chala Park, Inseong Lee, Jinwoo Kim. 2012. Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video. Comput Hum Behav 28, 4: 1365--1378.

Digital Library

[47]

Jennifer Marlow and Laura Dabbish. 2012. Designing interventions to reduce psychological distance in globally distributed teams. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, ACM, 163--166.

Digital Library

[48]

Duyen T. Nguyen and Susan R. Fussell. 2013. Effect of message content on communication processes in intercultural and same-culture instant messaging conversations. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, 19--32.

Digital Library

[49]

Michael Boyer O'Leary, Jeanne M. Wilson, Anca Metiu. 2014. Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quart 38, 4: 1219--1243.

Digital Library

[50]

Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Hum-Comput Interact 15, 2: 139--178.

Digital Library

[51]

Judith Olson. 2009. Even small distance matters: Social ergonomics in collocated and remote teams. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM.

Digital Library

[52]

Ana Ortiz de Guinea, Jane Webster, D. Sandy Staples. 2012. A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Inform Manage 49, 6: 301--308.

Digital Library

[53]

Sherry M.B. Thatcher and Pankaj C. Patel. 2011. Demographic fault lines: A meta-analysis of the literature. J Appl Psychol 96, 6: 1119--1139.

[54]

Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1983. Organizational demography. Res Organ Behav. Retrieved May 22, 2015 from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1984--10945-001

[55]

Stephen A. Rains. 2005. Leveling the organizational playing field -- virtually a meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Commun Res 32, 2: 193--234.

[56]

Christine M. Riordan and Lynn M. Shore. 1997. Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. J Appl Psychol 82, 3: 342--358.

[57]

Lionel P. Robert. 2013. A multi-level analysis of the impact of shared leadership in diverse virtual teams. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 363--374.

Digital Library

[58]

Lionel P. Robert, Alan R. Dennis, Yu-Ting Caisy Hung. 2009. Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J Manage Inform Syst 26, 2: 241--279.

Digital Library

[59]

Lionel P. Robert, Alan R. Dennis, Manju K. Ahuja. 2008. Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Inform Syst Res 19, 3: 314--334. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0177

[60]

Lionel Robert and Daniel M. Romero. 2015. Crowd size, diversity and performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 1379--1382.

Digital Library

[61]

Judith A. Ross. 2006. Trust makes the team go round. Harvard Manage Update 11, 6: 3--6.

[62]

Victor Savicki, Merle Kelley, Dawn Lingenfelter. 1997. Gender, group composition, and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Comput Hum Behav 12, 4: 549--565.

[63]

Debra L., Shapiro, Staci A. Furst, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, Mary Ann Von Glinow. 2002. Transnational teams in the electronic age: Are team identity and high performance at risk? J Organ Behav 23, 4: 455--467.

[64]

Meir Shemla, Bertolt Meyer, Lindred Greer, Karen A. Jehn. 2014. A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team's composition affect team processes and outcomes? J Organ Behav

[65]

Frank Siebdrat, Martin Hoegl, Holger Ernst. 2014. Subjective distance and team collaboration in distributed teams. J Prod Innovat Manag 31, 4: 765--779.

[66]

D. Sandy Staples and Lina Zhao. 2006. The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decis Negot 15, 4: 389--406.

[67]

Henri Tajfel and John C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc Psychol Intergroup Relat 33, 47: 74.

[68]

Elizabeth E. Umphress, Kristin Smith-Crowe, Arthur P. Brief, Joerg Dietz, Marla Baskerville Watkins. 2007. When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. J Appl Psychol 92, 2: 396.

[69]

Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark G.J. van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 3789--3798.

Digital Library

[70]

Katherine Y. Williams and Charles A. O'Reilly. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 20), Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings (eds.). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 77--140.

[71]

Jeanne M. Wilson, Michael O'Leary, Anca Metiu, Quintus R. Jett. 2008. Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ Stud 29, 7: 979--1002.

[72]

Jamie. Windeler, Likoebe Maruping, Lionel. P. Robert, Cindy Riemenschneider. 2015. E-identity, conflict and shared understanding in distributed teams. J Assoc Inform Syst 16, 7: 608--645.

[73]

Rolf Van Dick, Daan Van Knippenberg, Sylvia Hagele, Yves R., Guillaume, Felix C. Brodbeck. 2008. Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Hum Relat 61, 1463--1492.

[74]

Daan Van Knippenberg, Carsten K.W. De Dreu, Astrid C. Homan. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89, 6: 1008--1022.

[75]

Daan Van Knippenberg and Michaela C. Schippers. 2007. Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol 58, 515--541.

[76]

Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary M. Maloney, Anita D. Bhappu, Rommel Bombie Salvador. 2008. When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ Behav Hum Dec 107, 1: 41--59.

[77]

Dongsong Zhang, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Lina Zhou, Xiaolan Fu. 2007. The impact of individualism -- collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. J Manage Inform Syst 23, 4: 53--80.

Digital Library

Cited By

Depoo LHermida A(2024)The role and factors impacting virtual human resource management capacity to build remote teams' effectiveness and retentionSerbian Journal of Management10.5937/sjm19-4632919:1(187-205)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm19-46329
Santos MDias M(2024)Exploring The Missing Link Between Trust in Business Negotiation and Virtual WorkEuropean Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).262:2(291-309)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).26
Breideband TTalkad Sukumar PMark GCaruso MD'Mello SStriegel A(2022)Home-Life and Work Rhythm Diversity in Distributed Teamwork: A Study with Information Workers during the COVID-19 PandemicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129426:CSCW1(1-23)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3512942
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Far but Near or Near but Far?: The Effects of Perceived Distance on the Relationship between Geographic Dispersion and Perceived Diversity

Recommendations

Does Collectivism Inhibit Individual Creativity?: The Effects of Collectivism and Perceived Diversity on Individual Creativity and Satisfaction in Virtual Ideation Teams
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

One particular problem CSCW and HCI scholars have sought to address through the design of collaborative systems is the issues associated with diversity and creativity. Diversity can promote creativity by exposing individuals to different perspectives ...
Virtual teamwork training: factors influencing the acceptance of collaboration technology

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that influence the acceptance of electronic collaboration technology by higher education students and that influence their predicted usage of the technology for virtual team collaboration. The ...
A field of study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance

This article examines the relationship between interpersonal trust and virtual collaborative relationship (VCR) performance. Findings from a study of 10 operational telemedicine projects in health care delivery systems are presented. The results ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2016

6108 pages

ISBN:9781450333627

DOI:10.1145/2858036

General Chairs:
Jofish Kaye
Yahoo
,
Allison Druin
University of Maryland / National Park Service
,
Program Chairs:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
Dan Morris
Microsoft
,
Juan Pablo Hourcade
University of Iowa

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI'16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 7 - 12, 2016

California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 565 of 2,435 submissions, 23%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
374
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)37
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Depoo LHermida A(2024)The role and factors impacting virtual human resource management capacity to build remote teams' effectiveness and retentionSerbian Journal of Management10.5937/sjm19-4632919:1(187-205)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm19-46329
Santos MDias M(2024)Exploring The Missing Link Between Trust in Business Negotiation and Virtual WorkEuropean Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).262:2(291-309)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).26
Breideband TTalkad Sukumar PMark GCaruso MD'Mello SStriegel A(2022)Home-Life and Work Rhythm Diversity in Distributed Teamwork: A Study with Information Workers during the COVID-19 PandemicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129426:CSCW1(1-23)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3512942
Rodríguez-Pérez GNadri RNagappan M(2021)Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature reviewEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-021-09992-226:5Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-09992-2
Gómez-Zará DGuo MDeChurch LContractor NBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)The Impact of Displaying Diversity Information on the Formation of Self-assembling TeamsProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376654(1-15)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376654
Morrison-Smith SRuiz J(2020)Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature reviewSN Applied Sciences10.1007/s42452-020-2801-52:6Online publication date: 20-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
Muller MFussell SGao GHinds POliveira NReinecke KRobert LSiangliulue KWulf VYuan CGilbert EKarahalios K(2019)Learning from Team and Group Diversity: Nurturing and Benefiting from our HeterogeneityCompanion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3311957.3359440(498-505)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3311957.3359440
Seering JNg FYao ZKaufman G(2018)Applications of Social Identity Theory to Research and Design in Computer-Supported Cooperative WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32747712:CSCW(1-34)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274771
Romero DReinecke KRobert Lde Rijke MShokouhi MTomkins AZhang M(2017)The Influence of Early RespondentsProceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3018661.3018725(101-110)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3018661.3018725
Ye TRobert LLee CPoltrock SBarkhuus LBorges MKellogg W(2017)Does Collectivism Inhibit Individual Creativity?Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998261(2344-2358)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2998181.2998261

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents