The digital divide at the margins: co-designing information solutions to address the needs of indigenous populations of rural India

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a case study focusing on information and communication design in indigenous villages of rural India. The villages examined for this study were geographically remote and socio-economically underdeveloped, and their populations represented individuals who possessed low levels of literacy, limited language proficiency in English and mainstream Indic languages (e.g., Hindi and Bengali), and limited familiarity with computer us and computing practices. The authors sought to examine this context by conducting ethnographic field research involving a variety of methods. Through these approaches, the authors found a range of cultural and contextual factors are instrumental in shaping and co-creating communication design solutions for underserved international audiences. (Such factors include such as long-term research engagements, in-situ design development, and embracing dialogic and reflexive praxis when designing for local audiences.)

References

1. Anthopoulos, L. G., Siozos, P., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2007). Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services. Government Information Quarterly, 24 (2), 353--376.
2. Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International journal of intercultural relations, 10(2), 179--196.
3. Bieling, T., Joost, G., & Müller, A. (2010). Collaborative potential: Designing coexistence in urban context, V!RUS, 04. Retrieved from http://www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus04/secs/submitted/virus_04_submitted_2_en.pdf
4. Blake, A. R., & Quiros Garzon, M. (2010). ICT for Development: Sustainable technology-supported participatory development for poverty alleviation in the context of digital divides. Retrieved from http://www.zef.de/fileadmin/downloads/forum/docprog/Termpapers/2010_1_Blake_Quiros.pdf
5. Braund, P., & Schwittay, A. (2006). The missing piece: Human-driven design and research in ICT and development. In Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies and Development.
6. Byrne, E., & Sahay, S. (2007). Participatory design for social development: A South African case study on community-based health information systems. Information Technology for Development, 13(1), 71--94.
7. Camara, S., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Luckin, R., & Waema, T. (2008). Bridging the global digital divide with participatory customisation. In 6th Conference on Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication (CATAC), Nimes, France.
8. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
9. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509--536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1507--1527.
11. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
12. David, S., Sabiescu, A., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Co-design with communities. A reflection on the literature. In Proceedings of the 7th International Development Informatics Association Conference (IDIA).
13. Dearden, A. (2008). User-centered design considered harmful (with apologies to Edsger Dijkstra, Niklaus Wirth, and Don Norman). Information Technologies & International Development, 4(3), 7--12.
14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 1--45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dutta, M. J. (2011). Communicating social change: Structure, culture and agency. New York: Routledge.
16. Dyson, L. E. (2004). Cultural issues in the adoption of information and communication technologies by Indigenous Australians. In Proceedings cultural attitudes towards communication and technology. Perth: Murdoch University.
17. Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design. Rutgers University Press.
18. Gautam, V., & Blessing, L. (2009). Cultural Influences on Design Processes - an Empirical Study. In M. Norell Bergendahl, M. Grimheden, L. Leifer, P. Skogstad, & U. Lindemann (Eds.) DS 58-9: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 9, Human Behavior in Design, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
19. Gigler, B. S. (2004). Including the Excluded-Can ICTs empower poor communities? Towards an alternative evaluation framework based on the capability approach. In 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach.
20. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
21. Harding S. (1998). Is science multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN.: Indiana University Press.
22. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies, 17(1), 13--26.
23. Johnson, J. C., & Griffith, D. C. (1998). Visual data: Collection, analysis and representation. In V. C. De Munck & E. J. Sobo, (Eds.). (1998). Using methods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook (pp. 211--228). Rowman Altamira.
24. Johri, A., & Pal, J. (2012). Capable and convivial design (CCD): A framework for designing information and communication technologies for human development. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 61--75.
25. Kapuire, G. K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kurio, S., Bidwell, N. J., & Blake, E. (2010). Revolution in ICT, the last hope for African rural communities' technology appropriation. Retrieved from http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/4587/1/Bidwell_2010.pdf
26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Marcus, A. (2003). Global/intercultural user interface design. Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications, 355--381.
28. Marker, P., McNamara, K., & Wallace, L. (2002). The significance of information and communication technologies for reducing poverty. London, UK: DFID.
29. Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Experiencing intercultural communication: An introduction (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30. Mazé, R., & Redström, J. (2007). Difficult forms: Critical practices of design and research. In IASDR 2007 Proceedings: Emerging Trends in Design Research.
31. McIver, W. J. (2003). A Community Informatics for the Information Society. Communicating in the Information Society. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
32. Merritt, S., & Stolterman, E. (2012). Cultural hybridity in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference. ACM.
33. Nielsen, J. (2005). Designing for the cultural "other" - A global perspective on ICT and illiteracy. Retrieved from http://openarchive.cbs.dk/handle/10398/6464.
34. Nieusma, D. (2004). Alternative design scholarship: Working toward appropriate design. Design Issues, 20(3), 13--24.
35. Olphert, W., & Damodaran, L. (2007). Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(9), 27.
36. Puri, S. K., & Sahay, S. (2007). Role of ICTs in participatory development: An Indian experience. Information Technology for Development, 13(2), 133--160.
37. Richards, C. (2005). The design of effective ICT-supported learning activities: Exemplary models, changing requirements, and new possibilities. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 60--79.
38. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.
39. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Siriginidi, S. R. (2009). Achieving millennium development goals: Role of ICTS innovations in India. Telematics and Informatics, 26(2), 127--143.
41. Smyth, T. N., Kumar, S., Medhi, I., & Toyama, K. (2010). Where there's a will there's a way: Mobile media sharing in urban India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
42. Sorrells, K. (2012). Intercultural communication: Globalization and social justice. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., & Klok, J. (2007). Early user involvement in research and design projects- A review of methods and practices. In 23rd European Group for Organizational Studies Colloquium.
44. Stewart, J., & Williams, R. (2005). The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: Social learning and the user. In H. Rohracher (Ed.), User involvement in innovation processes: Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective (pp. 39--71). Munich: Profil-Verlag.
45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. Oxford University Press.
47. Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kähkönen, E., & Kommers, P. (2006). Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 126--130.
48. The Planning Commission, Government of India. (2008). Eleventh five year plan (2007--2012). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
49. Toyama K. (2010). Human--Computer Interaction and global development. Foundations and Trends in Human--Computer Interaction, 4(1), 1--79. doi:10.1561/1100000021
50. World Bank Group (Ed.). (2008) World Development Indicators 2008, World Bank Publications.
51. Young, P. A. (2008). Integrating culture in the design of ICTs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 6--17.

Index Terms

• Information systems