research-article

3D Blur Discrimination

Published:21 April 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Blur is an important attribute in the study and modeling of the human visual system. In the blur discrimination experiments, just-noticeable additional blur required to differentiate from the reference blur level is measured. The past studies on blur discrimination have measured the sensitivity of the human visual system to blur using two-dimensional (2D) test patterns. In this study, subjective tests are performed to measure blur discrimination thresholds using stereoscopic 3D test patterns. Specifically, how the binocular disparity affects the blur sensitivity is measured on a passive stereoscopic display. A passive stereoscopic display renders the left and right eye images in a row interleaved format. The subjects have to wear circularly polarized glasses to filter the appropriate images to the left and right eyes. Positive, negative, and zero disparity values are considered in these experiments. A positive disparity value projects the objects behind the display screen, a negative disparity value projects the objects in front of the display screen, and a zero disparity value projects the objects at the display plane. The blur discrimination thresholds are measured for both symmetric and asymmetric stereo viewing cases. In the symmetric viewing case, the same level of additional blur is applied to the left and right eye stimulus. In the asymmetric viewing case, different levels of additional blur are applied to the left and right eye stimuli. The results of this study indicate that, in the symmetric stereo viewing case, binocular disparity does not affect the blur discrimination thresholds for the selected 3D test patterns. As a consequence of these findings, we conclude that the models developed for 2D blur discrimination can be used for 3D blur discrimination. We also show that the Weber model provides a good fit to the blur discrimination threshold measurements for the symmetric stereo viewing case. In the asymmetric viewing case, the blur discrimination thresholds decreased, and the decrease in threshold values is found to be dominated by eye observing the higher blur.

References

  1. Payman Aflaki, Miska M. Hannuksela, J. Hakkinen, Paul Lindroos, and Moncef Gabbouj. 2010. Subjective study on compressed asymmetric stereoscopic video. In International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 4021--4024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Albert J. Ahumada. 2002. Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. J. Vision 2, 1 (2002), 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. C. Chen, K. P. Chen, C. H. Tseng, S. T. Kuo, and K. N. Wu. 2009. Constructing a metrics for blur perception with blur discrimination experiments. Proc. SPIE, Image Quality and System Performance VI 724219 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mark A. Georgeson, Keith A. May, Tom C. A. Freeman, and Gillian S. Hesse. 2007. From filters to features: Scale--space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. J. Vision 7, 13 (2007), 7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Glenn Hagele. 2013. Dominant Eye Test. Retrieved from http://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/lasik-monovision-dominant-eye.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. R. Hamerly and C. A. Dvorak. 1981. Detection and discrimination of blur in edges and lines. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 4 (1981), 448--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Robert T. Held, Emily A. Cooper, and Martin S. Banks. 2012. Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Curr. Biol. 22, 5 (2012), 426--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. David M. Hoffman, Ahna R. Girshick, Kurt Akeley, and Martin S. Banks. 2008. Vergence--accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vision 8, 3 (2008), 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Joseph J. Kane. 1990. Instrumentation for monitor calibration. SMPTE J. 99, 9 (1990), 744--752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Ewen King-Smith, Scott S. Grigsby, Algis J. Vingrys, Susan C. Benes, and Aaron Supowit. 1994. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 34, 7 (1994), 885--912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. George Mather and David R. R. Smith. 2002. Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception. Perception 31, 10 (2002), 1211--1220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David F. McAllister. 1993. Stereo Computer Graphics and Other True 3D Technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. William H. McIlhagga and Keith A. May. 2012. Optimal edge filters explain human blur detection. J. Vision 12, 10 (2012), 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Walter R. Miles. 1930. Ocular dominance in human adults. J. Gen. Psychol. 3, 3 (1930), 412--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. K. Pääkkönen and M. J. Morgan. 1994. Effects of motion on blur discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3 (1994), 992--1002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Denis G. Pelli. 1997. The VideoToolBox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10, 4 (1997), 437--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. PhotoResearch. 2014. PR-650 SpectraScan Colorimeter. Retrieved from http://www.photoresearch.com/current/pr650.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavriel Salvendy. 2012. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucie Sawides, Pablo de Gracia, Carlos Dorronsoro, Michael Webster, and Susana Marcos. 2011. Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations. J. Vision 11, 7 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mahesh Subedar and Lina J. Karam. 2014. Study of blur discrimination for 3D stereo viewing. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 90110T--90110T.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruce H. Walker. 2000. Optical Design for Visual Systems. Vol. 45. SPIE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. B. Watson and A. J. Ahumada. 2011. Blur clarified: A review and synthesis of blur discrimination. J. Vision 11, 5 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andrew B. Watson and Denis G. Pelli. 1983. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 2 (1983), 113--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R. J. Watt and M. J. Morgan. 1983. The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision. Vision Res. 23, 12 (1983), 1465--1477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Roger J. Watt. 1990. Visual Processing: Computational, Psychophysical and Cognitive Research. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Michael A. Webster, Mark A. Georgeson, and Shernaaz M. Webster. 2002. Neural adjustments to image blur. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 9 (2002), 839--840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Michael A. Weissman and Andrew J. Woods. 2011. A simple method for measuring crosstalk in stereoscopic displays. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 786310--786310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 3D Blur Discrimination

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!