research-article

Open access

An Internet-Wide Analysis of Traffic Policing

Authors:

Pavlos Papageorge,

Andreas Terzis,

Ethan Katz-Bassett, and

Ramesh GovindanAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCOMM '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference

August 2016

Pages 468 - 482

https://doi.org/10.1145/2934872.2934873

Published: 22 August 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Large flows like videos consume significant bandwidth. Some ISPs actively manage these high volume flows with techniques like policing, which enforces a flow rate by dropping excess traffic. While the existence of policing is well known, our contribution is an Internet-wide study quantifying its prevalence and impact on video quality metrics. We developed a heuristic to identify policing from server-side traces and built a pipeline to deploy it at scale on traces from a large online content provider, collected from hundreds of servers worldwide. Using a dataset of 270 billion packets served to 28,400 client ASes, we find that, depending on region, up to 7% of lossy transfers are policed. Loss rates are on average six times higher when a trace is policed, and it impacts video playback quality. We show that alternatives to policing, like pacing and shaping, can achieve traffic management goals while avoiding the deleterious effects of policing.

References

[1]

Policing Detection (Supplemental Material). https://usc-nsl.github.io/policing-detection/.

[2]

B. Ager, N. Chatzis, A. Feldmann, N. Sarrar, S. Uhlig, and W. Willinger. Anatomy of a Large European IXP. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '12), 2012.

Digital Library

[3]

A. Aggarwal, S. Savage, and T. E. Anderson. Understanding the Performance of TCP Pacing. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '00), 2000.

[4]

V. Bashko, N. Melnikov, A. Sehgal, and J. Schonwalder. BonaFide: A traffic shaping detection tool for mobile networks. In Proc. of IFIP/IEEE Symp. on Integrated Network Management (IM '13), 2013.

[5]

C. Bastian, T. Klieber, J. Livingood, J. Mills, and R. Woundy. RFC 6057: Comcast's Protocol-Agnostic Congestion Management System, 2010.

[6]

S. Bauer, D. Clark, and W. Lehr. PowerBoost. In Proc. of ACM Workshop on Home Networks (HomeNets '11), 2011.

Digital Library

[7]

R. Braden. RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers, 1989.

Digital Library

[8]

L. S. Brakmo, S. W. O'Malley, and L. L. Peterson. TCP Vegas: New Techniques for Congestion Detection and Avoidance. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '94), 1994.

Digital Library

[9]

B. Briscoe, A. Brunstrom, A. Petlund, D. Hayes, D. Ros, J. Tsang, S. Gjessing, G. Fairhurst, C. Griwodz, and M. Welzl. Reducing Internet Latency: a Survey of Techniques and Their Merits. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2014.

[10]

K. Burns. TCP/IP Analysis & Troubleshooting Toolkit. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

Digital Library

[11]

M. Calder, X. Fan, Z. Hu, E. Katz-Bassett, J. Heidemann, and R. Govindan. Mapping the Expansion of Google's Serving Infrastructure. In Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '13), 2013.

Digital Library

[12]

CAPTCP. http://research.protocollabs.com/captcp/.

[13]

R. L. Carter and M. Crovella. Measuring Bottleneck Link Speed in Packet-Switched Networks. Performance Evaluation, 27/28(4), 1996.

Digital Library

[14]

Y. Cheng. tcp: reducing lost retransmits in recovery (Linux kernel patches). http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/368957, 2015.

[15]

Cisco. Comparing Traffic Policing and Traffic Shaping for Bandwidth Limiting. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/quality-of-service-qos/qos-policing/19645-policevsshape.html#traffic.

[16]

Cisco. The Zettabyte Era – Trends and Analysis. White Paper, 2014.

[17]

M. Dischinger, M. Marcon, S. Guha, P. K. Gummadi, R. Mahajan, and S. Saroiu. Glasnost: Enabling End Users to Detect Traffic Differentiation. In Proc. of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '10), 2010.

Digital Library

[18]

F. Dobrian, V. Sekar, A. Awan, I. Stoica, D. A. Joseph, A. Ganjam, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Gr. on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '11), 2011.

Digital Library

[19]

N. Dukkipati, M. Mathis, Y. Cheng, and M. Ghobadi. Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP. In Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '11), 2011.

Digital Library

[20]

N. Dukkipati, T. Refice, Y. Cheng, J. Chu, T. Herbert, A. Agarwal, A. Jain, and N. Sutin. An Argument for Increasing TCP's Initial Congestion Window. ACM SIGCOMM Comp. Commun. Rev., 40, 2010.

Digital Library

[21]

W. Feng, D. D. Kandlur, D. Saha, and K. G. Shin. Understanding and Improving TCP Performance Over Networks With Minimum Rate Guarantees. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(2), 1999.

Digital Library

[22]

T. Flach, N. Dukkipati, A. Terzis, B. Raghavan, N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, A. Jain, S. Hao, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. Reducing Web Latency: the Virtue of Gentle Aggression. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '13), 2013.

Digital Library

[23]

T. Flach, L. Pedrosa, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. A Longitudinal Analysis of Traffic Policing Across the Web. USC Computer Science Technical Report 15-961, 2015.

[24]

S. Floyd and V. Jacobson. Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(4), 1993.

Digital Library

[25]

A. Ganjam, F. Siddiqui, J. Zhan, X. Liu, I. Stoica, J. Jiang, V. Sekar, and H. Zhang. C3: Internet-Scale Control Plane for Video Quality Optimization. In Proc. of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '15), 2015.

Digital Library

[26]

J. Gettys and K. Nichols. Bufferbloat: Dark Buffers in the Internet. Queue, 9(11), 2011.

Digital Library

[27]

M. Ghobadi, Y. Cheng, A. Jain, and M. Mathis. Trickle: Rate Limiting YouTube Video Streaming. In Proc. of USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC '12). USENIX, 2012.

Digital Library

[28]

N. Hu and P. Steenkiste. Evaluation and Characterization of Available Bandwidth Probing Techniques. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21(6), 2003.

Digital Library

[29]

T.-Y. Huang, R. Johari, N. McKeown, M. Trunnell, and M. Watson. A Buffer-Based Approach to Rate Adaptation: Evidence from a Large Video Streaming Service. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '14), 2014.

Digital Library

[30]

J. Hui, K. Lau, A. Jain, A. Terzis, and J. Smith. YouTube performance is improved in T-Mobile network. http://velocityconf.com/velocity2014/public/schedule/detail/35350.

[31]

A. M. Kakhki, F. Li, D. Choffnes, A. Mislove, and E. Katz-Bassett. BingeOn Under the Microscope: Understanding T-Mobile's Zero-Rating Implementation. In Proc. of Internet-QoE Workshop, 2016.

[32]

A. M. Kakhki, A. Razaghpanah, H. Koo, A. Li, R. Golani, D. Choffnes, P. Gill, and A. Mislove. Identifying Traffic Differentiation in Mobile Networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conference (IMC'15), 2015.

Digital Library

[33]

P. Kanuparthy and C. Dovrolis. DiffProbe: Detecting ISP Service Discrimination. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '10), 2010.

Digital Library

[34]

P. Kanuparthy and C. Dovrolis. ShaperProbe: End-to-end Detection of ISP Traffic Shaping Using Active Methods. In Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '11), 2011.

Digital Library

[35]

S. Keshav. A Control-theoretic Approach to Flow Control. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '91), 1991.

Digital Library

[36]

J. Kidambi, D. Ghosal, and B. Mukherjee. Dynamic Token Bucket (DTB): A Fair Bandwidth Allocation Algorithm for High-Speed Networks. Journal of High-Speed Networks, 2001.

Digital Library

[37]

C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Netalyzr: Illuminating the Edge Network. In Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '10), 2010.

Digital Library

[38]

C. Labovitz, S. Iekel-Johnson, D. McPherson, J. Oberheide, and F. Jahanian. Internet inter-domain traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 41(4), Aug. 2010.

Digital Library

[39]

G. Linden. Make Data Useful. http://sites.google.com/site/glinden/Home/StanfordDataMining.2006-11-28.ppt, 2006.

[40]

L. Lovász. On the Ratio of Optimal Integral And Fractional Covers. Discrete Mathematics, 13(4):383–390, 1975.

Digital Library

[41]

M. Luckie, A. Dhamdhere, D. Clark, B. Huffaker, and K. Claffy. Challenges in Inferring Internet Interdomain Congestion. In Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '14), 2014.

Digital Library

[42]

M-Lab. ISP Interconnection and its Impact on Consumer Internet Performance. http://www.measurementlab.net/static/observatory/M-Lab_Interconnection_Study_US.pdf.

[43]

R. Mahajan, M. Zhang, L. Poole, and V. S. Pai. Uncovering Performance Differences Among Backbone ISPs with Netdiff. In USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design & Implementation (NSDI '08), 2008.

Digital Library

[44]

M. Mathis and J. Mahdavi. Forward Acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '96), 1996.

Digital Library

[45]

Microsoft Research TCP Analyzer. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/tcpanalyzer/.

[46]

J. Nagle. RFC 896: Congestion Control in IP/TCP Internetworks, 1984.

Digital Library

[47]

Netflix. Letter to Shareholders (Q4 2014). http://ir.netflix.com/results.cfm.

[48]

K. Nichols and V. Jacobson. Controlling Queue Delay. Queue, 10(5), May 2012.

Digital Library

[49]

J. Pahdye and S. Floyd. On Inferring TCP Behavior. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '01), 2001.

Digital Library

[50]

R. Pan, P. Natarajan, C. Piglione, M. S. Prabhu, V. Subramanian, F. Baker, and B. VerSteeg. PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR '13), 2013.

[51]

V. Paxson. Automated Packet Trace Analysis of TCP Implementations. In Proc. of ACM Conf. of the Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM '97), 1997.

Digital Library

[52]

F. Qian, A. Gerber, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, O. Spatscheck, and W. Willinger. TCP Revisited: A Fresh Look at TCP in the Wild. In Proc. of Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '09), 2009.

Digital Library

[53]

S. Rewaskar, J. Kaur, and F. D. Smith. A Passive State-Machine Approach for Accurate Analysis of TCP Out-of-Sequence Segments. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 36(3):51–64, 2006.

Digital Library

[54]

S. Sahu, P. Nain, C. Diot, V. Firoiu, and D. F. Towsley. On Achievable Service Differentiation With Token Bucket Marking For TCP. In Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS Conf., 2000.

Digital Library

[55]

Sandvine. Global Internet Phenomena Report 2H 2014. 2014.

[56]

S. Savage. Sting: A TCP-based Network Measurement Tool. In USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS '99), 1999.

Digital Library

[57]

M. B. Tariq, M. Motiwala, N. Feamster, and M. Ammar. Detecting Network Neutrality Violations with Causal Inference. In Proc. of ACM Conf. on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '09), 2009.

Digital Library

[58]

tcptrace. http://www.tcptrace.org.

[59]

I. van Beijnum. BGP: Building Reliable Networks with the Border Gateway Protocol. O'Reilly Media, 2002.

Digital Library

[60]

R. van Haalen and R. Malhotra. Improving TCP performance with bufferless token bucket policing: A TCP friendly policer. In Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN '07), 2007.

[61]

Wireshark. http://www.wireshark.org.

[62]

C. Wittbrodt. CAR Talk: Configuration Considerations for Cisco's Committed Access Rate. https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1290, 1998.

[63]

yconalyzer. http://yconalyzer.sourceforge.net/.

[64]

I. Yeom and A. L. N. Reddy. Realizing Throughput Guarantees in a Differentiated Services Network. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS '99), 1999.

Digital Library

[65]

YouTube JavaScript Player API Reference. https://developers.google.com/youtube/js_api_reference.

[66]

YouTube Statistics. http://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html.

[67]

Y. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, and M. Zhang. Detecting traffic differentiation in backbone ISPs with NetPolice. In A. Feldmann and L. Mathy, editors, Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '09), 2009.

Digital Library

[68]

J. Zhou, Q. Wu, Z. Li, S. Uhlig, P. Steenkiste, J. Chen, and G. Xie. Demystifying and Mitigating TCP Stalls at the Server Side. In Proc. of ACM Conf. on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '15), 2015.

Digital Library

Cited By

Shan DJiang LZhang PJiang WLi HTang YRen F(2024)Enforcing Fairness in the Traffic Policer Among Heterogeneous Congestion Control AlgorithmsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.327641032:1(34-49)Online publication date: Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2023.3276410
Lv GWu QTan QWang WLi ZXie G(2024)Accurate Throughput Prediction for Improving QoE in Mobile Adaptive StreamingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.3313592(1-18)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2023.3313592
Liu JLerner DChung JPaul UGupta ABelding E(2024)Watching Stars in Pixels: The Interplay Of Traffic Shaping and YouTube Streaming QoE over GEO Satellite NetworksPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8(153-169)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

An Internet-Wide Analysis of Traffic Policing
1. Networks
  1. Network performance evaluation
    1. Network measurement
    2. Network performance analysis

Recommendations

Dynamic versus Static Traffic Policing: A New Approach for Videoconference Traffic over Wireless Cellular Networks

The subject of traffic policing for computer communication networks has been studied extensively in the literature. However, the constant development of new multimedia applications which are “greedy” in terms of bandwidth and Quality of Service ...
Read More
End-user traffic policing for QoS assurance in polyservice RINA networks

Looking at the ever-increasing amount of heterogeneous distributed applications supported on current data transport networks, it seems evident that best-effort packet delivery falls short to supply their actual needs. Multiple approaches to Quality of ...
Read More
Traffic shaping measurements and analyses in 3G network
HP-MOSys '13: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on High performance mobile opportunistic systems

Traffic shaping effect may have significant impact on end-to-end Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning. Therefore, it should be carefully studied in order to allow the creation of appropriate traffic models to be used for simulations. First, to ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCOMM '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference

August 2016

645 pages

ISBN:9781450341936

DOI:10.1145/2934872

General Chairs:
Marinho Barcellos
UFRGS
,
Jon Crowcroft
University of Cambridge
,
Program Chairs:
Amin Vahdat
Google
,
Sachin Katti
Stanford University

Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 August 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGCOMM '16

Sponsor:

SIGCOMM

SIGCOMM '16: ACM SIGCOMM 2016 Conference

August 22 - 26, 2016

Florianopolis, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

SIGCOMM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 231 submissions, 17%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 554 of 3,547 submissions, 16%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

42
Total Citations
View Citations
2,924
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)242
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Shan DJiang LZhang PJiang WLi HTang YRen F(2024)Enforcing Fairness in the Traffic Policer Among Heterogeneous Congestion Control AlgorithmsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.327641032:1(34-49)Online publication date: Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2023.3276410
Lv GWu QTan QWang WLi ZXie G(2024)Accurate Throughput Prediction for Improving QoE in Mobile Adaptive StreamingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.3313592(1-18)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2023.3313592
Liu JLerner DChung JPaul UGupta ABelding E(2024)Watching Stars in Pixels: The Interplay Of Traffic Shaping and YouTube Streaming QoE over GEO Satellite NetworksPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8(153-169)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8
Dias SSousa P(2023)Implementation and Performance Analysis of Collaborative Peer-to-Peer Video-on-Demand Systems2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211858(1-6)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211858
Hildebrandt CWiewiorra L(2023)The past, present, and future of (net) neutrality: A state of knowledge review and research agendaJournal of Information Technology10.1177/0268396223117089139:1(167-193)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231170891
Shmeis ZAbdullah MNikolopoulos PArgyraki KChoffnes DGill PMontpetit MLeivadeas AUhlig SJaved M(2023)Localizing Traffic DifferentiationProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624809(591-605)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3618257.3624809
Khandkar VHanawal M(2023)FairNet: A Measurement Framework for Traffic Discrimination Detection on the InternetIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2023.326337320:4(4097-4109)Online publication date: Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2023.3263373
Zhang YLiu YGuo LLee J(2023)Measurement of a Large-Scale Short-Video Service Over Mobile and Wireless NetworksIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.313989322:6(3472-3488)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2021.3139893
Pournaghshband V(2023)Identifying Traffic Prioritization on the Internet2023 IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking and Applications (MetaCom)10.1109/MetaCom57706.2023.00068(355-359)Online publication date: Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/MetaCom57706.2023.00068
Zhu SLiu YGuo LNgan RLee J(2023)mBBR - Improving BBR Performance Over Rate-Limited Mobile Networks2023 IEEE 31st International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)10.1109/ICNP59255.2023.10355605(1-11)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP59255.2023.10355605
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents