Abstract
Medical professionals have long used algorithmic thinking to describe and implement health care processes without the benefit of the conceptual framework provided by a programming language. Instead, medical algorithms are expressed using English, flowcharts, or data tables. This results in prescriptions that are difficult to understand, hard to debug, and awkward to reuse. This paper reports on the design and evaluation of a domain-specific programming language, POP-PL for expressing medical algorithms. The design draws on the experience of researchers in two disciplines, programming languages and medicine. The language is based around the idea that programs and humans have complementary strengths, that when combined can make for safer, more accurate performance of prescriptions. We implemented a prototype of our language and evaluated its design by writing prescriptions in the new language and administering a usability survey to medical professionals. This formative evaluation suggests that medical prescriptions can be conveyed by a programming language's mode of expression and provides useful information for refining the language. Analysis of the survey results suggests that medical professionals can understand and correctly modify programs in POP-PL.
- Salman Ahmad, Alexis Battle, Zahman Malkani, and Sepandar D. Kamvar. The Jabberwocky programming environment for structured social computing. In Proc. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 53–64, 2011. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Apple Computer, Inc. Hypercard Script Language Guide: The Hypertalk Language. Addison-Wesley, 1988. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daniel W. Barowy, Charlie Curtsinger, Emery D. Berger, and Andrew McGregor. AUTOMAN: a platform for integrating human-based and digital computation. In Proc. Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA), pp. 639––654, 2012. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- SM Belknap, H Moore, SA Lanzotti, PR Yarnold, M Getz, DL Deitrick, A Peterson, J Akeson, T Maurer, RC Soltysik, GA Storm, and I Brooks. Application of software design principles and debugging methods to an analgesia prescription reduces risk of severe injury from medical use of opioids. Nature: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 84(3), pp. 385––392, 2008.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Steven M. Belknap. The Chicago Kinetic Simulator. The Mathmatica Journal 1, pp. 68–86, 1991.Google Scholar
- Chrisian J. Callsen and Gul Agha. Open heterogeneous computing in ActorSpace. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computer 21, pp. 289– 300, 1994. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Preventing medication errors: Quality chasm series. National Academies Press, 2007.Google Scholar
- Maria Cvach. Monitor alarm fatigue: An integrative review. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology 46, pp. 268––277, 2012.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R Filik, K Purdy, A Gale, and D Gerret. Labeling of medicines and patient safety: evaluating methods of reducing drug name confusion. Human Factors 48(1), pp. 39–47, 2006.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Matthew Flatt and PLT. Reference: Racket. PLT, TR-1, 2010. http:// racket-lang.org/tr1/ David M. Gaba, Mary Maxwell, and Abe DeAnda. Anesthetic mishaps: breaking the chain of accident evolution. Anesthesiology 66(5), pp. 670– 676, 1987.Google Scholar
- Patrice M. Healey and Edwin J. Jacobson. Common Medical Diagnoses: An Algorithmic Approach. Saunders, 1994.Google Scholar
- Carl Hewitt, Peter Bishop, and Richard Steiger. A universal modular ACTOR formalism for artificial intelligence. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 235–245, 1973. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Richard Hillestad, James Bigelow, Anthony Bower, Federico Girosi, Robin Meili, Richard Scoville, and Roger Taylor. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs 24(5), pp. 1103–1117, 2005.Google Scholar
- John T. James. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. Journal of Patient Safety 8, pp. 122–128, 2013.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jan Martin Jansen, Rinus Plasmeijer, Pieter Koopman, and Peter Achten. Embedding a web-based workflow management system in a functional language. In Proc. Language Descriptions, Tools and Applications (LDTA), 2010. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Spencer S. Jones, Robert S. Rudin, Tanja Perry, and Paul G. Shekelle. Health information technology: An updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of Internal Medicine 106(1), pp. 48– 54, 2014.Google Scholar
- David A. Kindig. Some implications of patient-oriented health care. In Proc. Health Conference of the New York Academy of Medicine, 1971.Google Scholar
- Ross Koppel, Metlay Cohen, Brian Abaluck, Russell Localio, Stephen E. Kimmel, and Brian L. Strom. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 293, pp. 1197–1203, 2005.Google Scholar
- Christopher P. Landrigan, Gareth J. Parry, Catherine B. Bones, Andrew D. Hackbarth, Donald A. Goldmann, and Paul J. Sharek. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. New England Journal of Medicine 363, pp. 2124–2134, 2010.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lucian L. Leape. Error in medicine. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 272, pp. 1851–1857, 1994.Google Scholar
- Bas Lijnse, Jan Martin Jansen, Ruud Nanne, and Rinus Plasmeijer. Capturing the netherlands coast guards SAR workflow with iTasks. In Proc. International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), 2011.Google Scholar
- Bas Lijnse, Jan Martin Jansen, and Rinus Plasmeijer. Incidone: A taskoriented incident coordination tool. In Proc. International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), 2012.Google Scholar
- Stuart B. Mushlin and Harry L. Greene II. Decision Making in Medicine (Third Edition). Mosby, 2010.Google Scholar
- Mor Peleg, Aziz A. Boxwala, Omolola Ogunyemi, Qin Zeng, Samson Tu, Ronilda Lacson, Elmer Bernstam, Nachman Ash, Peter Mork, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Edward H. Shortliff, and Robert A. Greenes. GLIF3: The evolution of a guideline representation format. In Proc. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), pp. 645–649, 2000.Google Scholar
- E. M. Schimmel. The hazards of hospitalization. Annals of Internal Medicine 60, pp. 58–63, 1964.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M Schubert, D Ausserhofer, M Desmedt, R Schwendimann, E Lesaffre, B Li, and S De Geest. Levels and correlates of implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals—a cross sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 50, pp. 230–239, 2013.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Yuval Sharar, Silvia Miksch, and Peter Johnson. The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of timeoriented clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14, pp. 29–51, 1998.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Hardeep Singh, Shrinidi Mani, Donna Espadas, Nancy Petersen, Veronica Franklin, and Laura A. Petersen. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study. Archives of Internal Medicine 169, pp. 982–989, 2009.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ian G. Stiell, R. Douglas McKnight, Gary H. Greenberg, Ian McDowell, Rama C. Nair, George A. Wells, Cristine Johns, and James R. Worthington. Implementation of the ottawa ankle rules. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 271, pp. 827–132, 1994.Google Scholar
- Samson W. Tu and Mark A. Musen. A flexible approach to guideline modeling. In Proc. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), pp. 420–424, 1999.Google Scholar
- Washington Adventist Hospital. Weight-Based beparin orders. 2009.Google Scholar
- https://extranet.adventisthealthcare.com/ LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rroECsjCLnY%3D&tabid= 649&mid=1813 Paul R. Yarnold. How to assess inter-observer reliability of ratings made on ordinal scales: Evaluating and comparing the Emergency Severity Index (Version 3) and Canadian Triage Acuity Scale. Optimal Data Analysis 3, pp. 42–49, 2014.Google Scholar
- Paul R. Yarnold and Robert C. Soltysik. Optimal Data Analysis: A Guidebook With Software for Windows. APA Books, 2004. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
POP-PL: a patient-oriented prescription programming language
Recommendations
POP-PL: A Patient-Oriented Prescription Programming Language
A medical prescription is a set of health care instructions that govern the plan of care for an individual patient, which may include orders for drug therapy, diet, clinical assessment, and laboratory testing. Clinicians have long used algorithmic ...
POP-PL: a patient-oriented prescription programming language
GPCE 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and ExperiencesMedical professionals have long used algorithmic thinking to describe and implement health care processes without the benefit of the conceptual framework provided by a programming language. Instead, medical algorithms are expressed using English, ...






Comments