skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Corrections to and Discussion of “Implementation and Evaluation of Mixed-criticality Scheduling Approaches for Sporadic Tasks”

Published:26 May 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The AMC-IA mixed-criticality scheduling analysis was proposed as an improvement to the AMC-MAX adaptive mixed-criticality scheduling analysis. However, we have identified several necessary corrections to the AMC-IA analysis. In this article, we motivate and describe those corrections, and discuss and illustrate why the corrected AMC-IA analysis cannot be shown to outperform AMC-MAX.

References

  1. Sanjoy K. Baruah, Alan Burns, and Robert I. Davis. 2011. Response-time analysis for mixed criticality systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS). 34--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Huang-Ming Huang, Christopher Gill, and Chenyang Lu. 2014. Implementation and evaluation of mixed-criticality scheduling approaches for sporadic tasks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 13, 4s, Article 126 (April 2014), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Corrections to and Discussion of “Implementation and Evaluation of Mixed-criticality Scheduling Approaches for Sporadic Tasks”

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!