skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

An Indoor Test Methodology for Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks

Published:28 March 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Repeatable and accurate tests are important when designing hardware and algorithms for solar-powered wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Since no two days are exactly alike with regard to energy harvesting, tests must be carried out indoors. Solar simulators are traditionally used in replicating the effects of sunlight indoors; however, solar simulators are expensive, have lighting elements that have short lifetimes, and are usually not designed to carry out the types of tests that hardware and algorithm designers require. As a result, hardware and algorithm designers use tests that are inaccurate and not repeatable (both for others and also for the designers themselves). In this article, we propose an indoor test methodology that does not rely on solar simulators. The test methodology has its basis in astronomy and photovoltaic cell design. We present a generic design for a test apparatus that can be used in carrying out the test methodology. We also present a specific design that we use in implementing an actual test apparatus. We test the efficacy of our test apparatus and, to demonstrate the usefulness of the test methodology, perform experiments akin to those required in projects involving solar-powered WSNs. Results of the said tests and experiments demonstrate that the test methodology is an invaluable tool for hardware and algorithm designers working with solar-powered WSNs.

References

  1. Karl Astrom and Tore Hagglund. 1995. PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning (2nd ed.). International Society of Automation (ISA), North Carolina, Chapter 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlo Alberto Boano, Marco Zúñiga, James Brown, Utz Roedig, Chamath Keppitiyagama, and Kay Römer. 2014. TempLab: A testbed infrastructure to study the impact of temperature on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’14). IEEE Press, 95--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Maryline Chetto and Hui Zhang. 2010. Performance evaluation of real-time scheduling heuristics for energy harvesting systems. In Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2010 IEEE/ACM Int’l Conference on Int’l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom). ACM, New York, NY, 398--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Debraj De, Wen-Zhan Song, Shaojie Tang, and Diane Cook. 2012. EAR: An energy and activity-aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks in smart environments. Comput. J. (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Manjunath Doddavenkatappa, MunChoon Chan, and A. L. Ananda. 2012. Indriya: A low-cost, 3d wireless sensor network testbed. In Testbeds and Research Infrastructure. Development of Networks and Communities, Thanasis Korakis, Hongbin Li, Phuoc Tran-Gia, and Hong-Shik Park (Eds.). Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 90. Springer, Berlin, New York, NY, 302--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rodrigo Fonseca, Prabal Dutta, Philip Levis, and Ion Stoica. 2008. Quanto: Tracking energy in networked embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI’08). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, 323--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jason Hill, Robert Szewczyk, Alec Woo, Seth Hollar, David Culler, and Kristofer Pister. 2000. System architecture directions for networked sensors. SIGPLAN Not. 35, 11 (Nov. 2000), 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jason L. Hill and David E. Culler. 2002. Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro 22, 6 (Nov. 2002), 12--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Internet Engineering Task Force: Mobile Ad hoc Networks Working Group. 2013. Dynamic MANET On-demand (AODVv2) Routing (draft-ietf-manet-dymo-26). Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dymo-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaein Jeong, Xiaofan Jiang, and David Culler. 2008. Design and analysis of micro-solar power systems for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS’08). IEEE, New York, NY, 181--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, and Mani B. Srivastava. 2007. Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 6, 4, Article 32 (Sept. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pius W. Q. Lee, Mingding Han, Hwee-Pink Tan, and Alvin Valera. 2010. An empirical study of harvesting-aware duty cycling in environmentally-powered wireless sensor networks. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS). IEEE, New York, NY, 306--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Philip Levis, Nelson Lee, Matt Welsh, and David Culler. 2003. TOSSIM: Accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’03). ACM, New York, NY, 126--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jun Luo, Jacques Panchard, MichałPiórkowski, Matthias Grossglauser, and Jean-Pierre Hubaux. 2006. MobiRoute: Routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 480--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tomas Markvart (Ed.). 2000. Solar Electricity (2nd ed.). John Wiley 8 Sons, Chichester, England, Chapter 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Arduino. 2013. Arduino. (Nov. 2013). Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.arduino.cc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper Bussmann. 2014. Cooper Bussmann PowerStor supercapacitors: HV Series. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/ dam/public/bussmann/Electronics/Resources/product-datasheets/Bus_Elx_DS_4376_HV_Series.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Environmental Research Group, King’s College London. 2012. London Air Quality Network. Retrieved September 4, 2015 from http://www.londonair.org.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Keithley Instruments. 2012. 2401 Low Voltage Sourcemeter Instrument. (Jan. 2012). Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.keithley.com/data?asset=55849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Linear Technology. 1998. LT1615/LT1615-1: Micropower Step-Up DC/DC Converters in ThinSOT. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/16151fas.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Linear Technology. 2013. LT6105: Precision, Extended Input Range Current Sense Amplifier. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/6105fa.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lumileds. 2014. LUXEON K: Plug and play matrix solution with precise flux, Vf and color. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.lumileds.com/uploads/366/DS102-pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. National Instruments. 2014. LabVIEW System Design Software. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.ni.com/labview/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Oriel Instruments. 2012. Oriel Sol3A Class AAA Solar Simulators. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://assets.newport.com/ webDocuments-EN/images/DS-12082_Sol3_Solar_Sim.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Texas Instruments. 2009. eZ430-RF2500-SEH: Solar energy harvesting development kit. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/sprt506/sprt506.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Texas Instruments. 2013. LM3406: 1.5-A, Constant Current, Buck Regulator for Driving High Power LEDs. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm3406.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Texas Instruments. 2014. CC2420: 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver Datasheet. Retrieved from http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2420.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. TinyOS Core Working Group. 2007. TinyOS TEP 105: Low Power Listening. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep105.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. TinyOS Core Working Group. 2008. Tymo. Retrieved June 12, 2015 from http://tinyos.stanford.edu/ tinyos-wiki/index.php/Tymo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Aden B. Meinel and Marjorie P. Meinel. 1976. Applied Solar Energy: An Introduction (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Roger A. Messenger and Jerry Ventre. 2010. Photovoltaic Systems Engineering (2nd ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Chapter 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Clemens Moser, Davide Brunelli, Lothar Thiele, and Luca Benini. 2006. Real-time scheduling with regenerative energy. In Real-Time Systems, 2006. 18th Euromicro Conference on. IEEE, New York, NY, 260--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sung Park, Andreas Savvides, and Mani B. Srivastava. 2000. SensorSim: A simulation framework for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWIM’00). ACM, New York, NY, 104--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Philippe Poggi, Gilles Notton, Marc Muselli, and Alain Louche. 2000. Stochastic study of hourly total solar radiation in Corsica using a Markov model. Int. J. Climatol. 20, 14 (2000), 1843--1860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Joseph Polastre, Robert Szewczyk, and David Culler. 2005. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’05). IEEE Press, Article 48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Victor Shnayder, Mark Hempstead, Bor-rong Chen, Geoff Werner Allen, and Matt Welsh. 2004. Simulating the Power Consumption of Large-scale Sensor Network Applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’04). ACM, New York, NY, 188--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jay Taneja, Jaein Jeong, and David Culler. 2008. Design, modeling, and capacity planning for micro-solar power sensor networks. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2008. IPSN’08. International Conference on. ACM, New York, NY, 407--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Geoffrey Werner-Allen, Patrick Swieskowski, and Matt Welsh. 2005. MoteLab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’05). IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Indoor Test Methodology for Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader
            About Cookies On This Site

            We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

            Learn more

            Got it!