Abstract
Linguistic mimicry, the adoption of another’s language patterns, is a subconscious behavior with pro-social benefits. However, some professions advocate its conscious use in empathic communication. This involves mutual mimicry; effective communicators mimic their interlocutors, who also mimic them back. Since mimicry has often been studied in face-to-face contexts, we ask whether individuals with empathic dispositions have unique communication styles and/or elicit mimicry in mediated communication on Facebook. Participants completed Davis’s Interpersonal Reactivity Index and provided access to Facebook activity. We confirm that dispositional empathy is correlated to the use of particular stylistic features. In addition, we identify four empathy profiles and find correlations to writing style. When a linguistic feature is used, this often “triggers” use by friends. However, the presence of particular features, rather than participant disposition, best predicts mimicry. This suggests that machine-human communications could be enhanced based on recently used features, without extensive user profiling.
- Praveen Aggarwal, Stephen B. Castleberry, Rick Ridnour, and C. David Shepherd. 2005. Salesperson empathy and listening: Impact on relationship outcomes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13, 3 (2005), 16--31.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Steven R. Aragon. 2003. Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 100 (2003), 57--68.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Shlomo Argamon, Moshe Koppel, Jonathan Fine, and Anat Rachel Shimoni. 2003. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text 23, 3 (2003), 321--346.Google Scholar
- Daniel C. Batson, Bruce D. Duncan, Paula Ackerman, Terese Buckley, and Kimberly Birch. 1981. Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40, 2 (1981), 290--302.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Janet B. Bavelas, Alex Black, Charles R. Lemery, and Jennifer Mullett. 1986. “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 2 (1986), 322.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Howard B. Beckman, Kathryn M. Markakis, Anthony L. Suchman, and Richard M Frankel. 1994. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Archives of Internal Medicine 154, 12 (1994), 1365--1370.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Frances R. Bilous and Robert M. Krauss. 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same-and mixed-gender dyads. Language 8 Communication 8, 3 (1988), 183--194.Google Scholar
- R. James R. Blair. 2005. Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition 14, 4 (2005), 698--718.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Carma L. Bylund and Gregory Makoul. 2002. Empathic communication and gender in the physician--patient encounter. Patient Education and Counseling 48, 3 (2002), 207--216.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sabrina Campano, Caroline Langlet, Nadine Glas, Chloé Clavel, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2015. An ECA expressing appreciations. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII’15). IEEE, 962--967. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Fabio Celli, Bruno Lepri, Joan-Isaac Biel, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Giuseppe Riccardi, and Fabio Pianesi. 2014. The workshop on computational personality recognition 2014. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1245--1246. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tanya L. Chartrand and Rick Van Baaren. 2009. Human mimicry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2009), 219--274.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Benjamin R. Cowan, Holly P. Branigan, Mateo Obregón, Enas Bugis, and Russell Beale. 2015. Voice anthropomorphism, interlocutor modelling and alignment effects on syntactic choices in human-computer dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 83 (2015), 27--42. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil and Lillian Lee. 2011. Chameleons in imagined conversations: A new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 76--87. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lillian Lee, Bo Pang, and Jon Kleinberg. 2012. Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 699--708. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Robert West, Dan Jurafsky, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2013. No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 307--318. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mark H. Davis. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 1 (1983), 113.Google Scholar
- Markus De Jong, Mariët Theune, and Dennis Hofs. 2008. Politeness and alignment in dialogues with a virtual guide. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 207--214. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Frans B. M. de Waal. 2008. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 1 (2008), 270--300.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jean Decety and Julie Grezes. 2006. The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research 1079, 1 (2006), 4--14.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jean Decety and Claus Lamm. 2006. Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. Scientific World Journal 6 (2006), 1146--1163.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Daantje Derks, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E. R. Bos. 2008. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 3 (2008), 766--785. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Nancy Eisenberg and Paul A. Miller. 1987. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin 101, 1 (1987), 91--119.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn. 2009. Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- Jinjuan Feng, Jenny Preece, and Jonathan Lazar. 2003. Interpersonal trust and empathy online: A fragile relationship. In CHI’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 718--719. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Riccardo Fusaroli, Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen, Andreas Roepstorff, Geraint Rees, Chris Frith, and Kristian Tylén. 2012. Coming to terms quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science 23, 8 (2012), 931--939.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland. 1991. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Double Day.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Golbeck, Cristina Robles, and Karen Turner. 2011. Predicting personality with social media. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 253--262. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Liang Gou, Michelle X. Zhou, and Huahai Yang. 2014. Knowme and shareme: Understanding automatically discovered personality traits from social media and user sharing preferences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 955--964. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Frederick J. Gravetter and Larry B. Wallnau. 2016. Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Chin-Chang Ho, Karl F. MacDorman, and Z. A. Dwi Pramono. 2008. Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. ACM, 169--176. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- William Ickes. 2009. Strangers in a Strange Lab: How Personality Shapes Our Initial Encounters with Others: How Personality Shapes Our Initial Encounters with Others. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sung Soo Kim, Stan Kaplowitz, and Mark V Johnston. 2004. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation 8 the Health Professions 27, 3 (2004), 237--251.Google Scholar
- William Labov. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2, 02 (1990), 205--254.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jessica L. Lakin, Valerie E. Jefferis, Clara Michelle Cheng, and Tanya L Chartrand. 2003. The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27, 3 (2003), 145--162.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Robert W. Levenson and Anna M. Ruef. 1992. Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 2 (1992), 234.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Matthew D. Lieberman. 2013. Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shao-Kang Lo. 2008. The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology 8 Behavior 11, 5 (2008), 595--597.Google Scholar
- François Mairesse and Marilyn A. Walker. 2010. Towards personality-based user adaptation: Psychologically informed stylistic language generation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 20, 3 (2010), 227--278. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mor Naaman, Jeffrey Boase, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2010. Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 189--192. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daniel Nettle. 2007. Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dong Nguyen, Rilana Gravel, Dolf Trieschnigg, and Theo Meder. 2013. “How old do you think I am?”; a study of language and age in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
- James W. Pennebaker, Roger J. Booth, and Martha E. Francis. 2007. LIWC2007: Linguistic inquiry and word count. Austin, Texas: liwc.net.Google Scholar
- Robin T. Peterson and Yam Limbu. 2009. The convergence of mirroring and empathy: Communications training in business-to-business personal selling persuasion efforts. Journal of Business-to-business Marketing 16, 3 (2009), 193--219.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ulrike Pfeil and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2007. Patterns of empathy in online communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 919--928. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Martin J. Pickering and Simon Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 02 (2004), 169--190.Google Scholar
- Stephanie D. Preston and Frans B. M. de Waal. 2002. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2002), 1--72.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Stephanie D. Preston and Alicia J. Hofelich. 2012. The many faces of empathy: Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review 4, 1 (2012), 24--33.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Daniele Quercia, Renaud Lambiotte, David Stillwell, Michal Kosinski, and Jon Crowcroft. 2012. The personality of popular facebook users. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 955--964. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Elizabeth A. Rider and Constance H. Keefer. 2006. Communication skills competencies: Definitions and a teaching toolbox. Medical Education 40, 7 (2006), 624--629.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Everett M. Rogers. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Martin Saerbeck and Christoph Bartneck. 2010. Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 53--60. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lauren E. Scissors, Alastair J. Gill, and Darren Gergle. 2008. Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 277--280. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory, Judith Aharon-Peretz, and Daniella Perry. 2009. Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain 132, 3 (2009), 617--627.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Tania Singer and Claus Lamm. 2009. The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156, 1 (2009), 81--96.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jon Starkweather. 2011. Cross-validation techniques in R: A brief overview of some methods, packages and function for assessing prediction models. (May 2011). Retrieved December 9, 2015, from https://www.unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/Benchmarks/CrossValidation1_JDS_May2011.pdf.Google Scholar
- Mariëlle Stel and Roos Vonk. 2010. Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology 101, 2 (2010), 311--323.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alistair G. Sutcliffe, Di Wang, and Robin I. M. Dunbar. 2015. Modelling the role of trust in social relationships. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 15, 4 (2015), 16. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rob Tanner and Tanya Chartrand. 2008. The convincing chameleon: Impact of mimicry on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (2008), 754--766.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Rick B. Van Baaren, Rob W. Holland, Bregje Steenaert, and Ad van Knippenberg. 2003a. Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39, 4 (2003), 393--398.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Rick B. Van Baaren, William W. Maddux, and Tanya L Chartrand. 2003b. It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 5 (2003), 1093--1102.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alessandro Vinciarelli and Gelareh Mohammadi. 2014. A survey of personality computing. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 5, 3 (2014), 273--291.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Joseph B. Walther, Yuhua Jake Liang, David C. DeAndrea, Stephanie Tom Tong, Caleb T. Carr, Erin L. Spottswood, and Yair Amichai-Hamburger. 2011. The effect of feedback on identity shift in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology 14, 1 (2011), 1--26.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jan Wieseke, Anja Geigenmüller, and Florian Kraus. 2012. On the role of empathy in customer-employee interactions. Journal of Service Research 15, 3 (2012), 316--331.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Show Me You Care: Trait Empathy, Linguistic Style, and Mimicry on Facebook
Recommendations
Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent
Special issue: Subtle expressivity for characters and robotsEmbodied computer agents are becoming an increasingly popular human-computer interaction technique. Often, these agents are programmed with the capacity for emotional expression. This paper investigates the psychological effects of emotion in agents ...
Annotating and modeling empathy in spoken conversations
We address two related problems in automatic affective behavior analysis: the design of the annotation protocol and the automatic recognition of empathy from spoken conversations.We propose and evaluate an annotation scheme for empathy inspired by the ...
Keep in touch: channel, expectation and experience
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper investigates whether and how digitally mediated social touch (remote touch) may influence the sense of connectedness toward a speaker and the emotional experience of what is being communicated. We employ an 'augmented' storytelling ...






Comments