10.1145/2999572.2999603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Measuring Latency Variation in the Internet

Online:06 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We analyse two complementary datasets to quantify the latency variation experienced by internet end-users: (i) a large-scale active measurement dataset (from the Measurement Lab Network Diagnostic Tool) which shed light on long-term trends and regional differences; and (ii) passive measurement data from an access aggregation link which is used to analyse the edge links closest to the user.

The analysis shows that variation in latency is both common and of significant magnitude, with two thirds of samples exceeding 100, ms of variation. The variation is seen within single connections as well as between connections to the same client. The distribution of experienced latency variation is heavy-tailed, with the most affected clients seeing an order of magnitude larger variation than the least affected. In addition, there are large differences between regions, both within and between continents. Despite consistent improvements in throughput, most regions show no reduction in latency variation over time, and in one region it even increases.

We examine load-induced queueing latency as a possible cause for the variation in latency and find that both datasets readily exhibit symptoms of queueing latency correlated with network load. Additionally, when this queueing latency does occur, it is of significant magnitude, more than 200\,ms in the median. This indicates that load-induced queueing contributes significantly to the overall latency variation.

References

  1. NDT test methodology. Wiki page: https://goo.gl/KrqtbQ, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Aikat, J. Kaur, F. D. Smith, and K. Jeffay. Variability in TCP round-trip times. In 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Alfredsson, G. Del Giudice, J. Garcia, A. Brunstrom, L. De Cicco, and S. Mascolo. Impact of tcp congestion control on bufferbloat in cellular networks. In IEEE 14th International Symposium and Workshops on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Allman. Comments on bufferbloat. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, January 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Z. S. Bischof, J. S. Otto, and F. E. Bustamante. Up, down and around the stack: Isp characterization from network intensive applications. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Briscoe, A. Brunstrom, A. Petlund, D. Hayes, D. Ros, I.-J. Tsang, S. Gjessing, G. Fairhurst, C. Griwodz, and M. Welzl. Reducing internet latency: A survey of techniques and their merits. Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Canadi, P. Barford, and J. Sommers. Revisiting broadband performance. In 2012 ACM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Chetty, S. Sundaresan, S. Muckaden, N. Feamster, and E. Calandro. Measuring broadband performance in south africa. In 4th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Chirichella and D. Rossi. To the moon and back: are internet bufferbloat delays really that large? In Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2013 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Choy, B. Wong, G. Simon, and C. Rosenberg. The brewing storm in cloud gaming: A measurement study on cloud to end-user latency. In 11th annual workshop on network and systems support for games. IEEE Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Dischinger, A. Haeberlen, K. P. Gummadi, and S. Saroiu. Characterizing residential broadband networks. In Internet Measurement Conference, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Fraleigh, S. Moon, B. Lyles, C. Cotton, M. Khan, D. Moll, R. Rockell, T. Seely, and S. C. Diot. Packet-level traffic measurements from the sprint ip backbone. Network, IEEE, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Hernandez-Campos and M. Papadopouli. Assessing the real impact of 802.11 wlans: A large-scale comparison of wired and wireless traffic. In 14th IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Høiland-Jørgensen, P. Hurtig, and A. Brunstrom. The Good, the Bad and the WiFi: Modern AQMs in a residential setting. Computer Networks, Oct. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Jaiswal, G. Iannaccone, C. Diot, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Inferring tcp connection characteristics through passive measurements. In INFOCOM 2004. IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. H. Jiang and C. Dovrolis. Passive estimation of tcp round-trip times. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Jiang, Y. Wang, K. Lee, and I. Rhee. Tackling bufferbloat in 3g/4g networks. In 2012 ACM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Netalyzr: illuminating the edge network. In 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Lab. ISP interconnection and its impact on consumer internet performance. Technical report, Measurement Lab Consortium, October 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Maier, A. Feldmann, V. Paxson, and M. Allman. On dominant characteristics of residential broadband internet traffic. In 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Mathis, J. Heffner, and R. Raghunarayan. TCP Extended Statistics MIB. RFC 4898 (Proposed Standard), May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Pathak, M. Zhang, Y. C. Hu, R. Mahajan, and D. Maltz. Latency inflation with mpls-based traffic engineering. In 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. V. Paxson, M. Allman, J. Chu, and M. Sargent. Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer. RFC 6298 (Proposed Standard), June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. A. Sánchez, J. S. Otto, Z. S. Bischof, D. R. Choffnes, F. E. Bustamante, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. Dasu: Pushing experiments to the internet's edge. In NSDI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Singla, B. Chandrasekaran, P. Godfrey, and B. Maggs. The internet at the speed of light. In 13th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Sundaresan, W. De Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford, and A. Pescapè. Broadband internet performance: a view from the gateway. In ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. F. Vacirca, F. Ricciato, and R. Pilz. Large-scale RTT measurements from an operational UMTS/GPRS network. In First International Conference on Wireless Internet. IEEE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measuring Latency Variation in the Internet

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            ACM Conferences cover image
            CoNEXT '16: Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies
            December 2016
            524 pages
            ISBN:9781450342926
            DOI:10.1145/2999572

            Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Online: 6 December 2016
            • Published: 6 December 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 18 of 33 submissions, 55%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!