Abstract
Analyzing a user's first impression of a Web site is essential for interface designers, as it is tightly related to their overall opinion of a site. In fact, this early evaluation affects user navigation behavior. Perceived usability and user interest (e.g., revisiting and recommending the site) are parameters influenced by first opinions. Thus, predicting the latter when creating a Web site is vital to ensure users’ acceptance. In this regard, Web aesthetics is one of the most influential factors in this early perception. We propose the use of low-level image parameters for modeling Web aesthetics in an objective manner, which is an innovative research field. Our model, obtained by applying a stepwise multiple regression algorithm, infers a user's first impression by analyzing three different visual characteristics of Web site screenshots—texture, luminance, and color—which are directly derived from MPEG-7 descriptors. The results obtained over three wide Web site datasets (composed by 415, 42, and 6 Web sites, respectively) reveal a high correlation between low-level parameters and the users’ evaluation, thus allowing a more precise and objective prediction of users’ opinion than previous models that are based on other image characteristics with fewer predictors. Therefore, our model is meant to support a rapid assessment of Web sites in early stages of the design process to maximize the likelihood of the users’ final approval.
- C. H. Achen. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 61--64. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Altaboli and Y. Lin. 2011. Objective and subjective measures of visual aesthetics of website interface design: The two sides of the coin. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Design and Development Approaches, Volume Part I (HCII’11). 35--44. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. De Angeli, A. Sutcliffe, and J. Hartmann. 2006. Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What influences users’ preferences? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’06). ACM, New York, NY, 271--280. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1142405.1142446Google Scholar
- M. Barrilero, S. Uribe, M. Alduán, F. Sánchez, and F. Álvarez. 2011. In-network content based image recommendation system for content-aware networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS’11). 115--120, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2011.5928791 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Bastan, H. Cam, U. Güdükbay, and O. Ulusoy. 2009. An MPEG-7 compatible video retrieval system with integrated support for complex multimodal queries. IEEE Multimedia PP, 99, 1. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2009.74 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. E. Berlyne. 1970. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- J. Buguin, L. Corb, J. Manyika, O. Nottebohm, M. Chui, B. Muller Barbat, and R. Said. 2011. The Impact of Internet Technologies: Search. Technical Report. McKinsey 8 Company.Google Scholar
- R. T. Cober, D. J. Brown, P. E. Levy, A. B. Cober, and L. M. Keeping. 2003. Organizational Web sites: Web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 11, 158--169. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- T. Comber and J. R. Maltby. 1997. Layout complexity: Does it measure usability? In Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’97). IFIP—The International Federation for Information Processing. Springer, 623--626. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_109 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. D. Cook. 1977. Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics, American Statistical Association and American Society for Quality 19, 1, 15--18.Google Scholar
- R. D. Cook and S. Weisberg. 1982. Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York. Chapman 8 Hall, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- D. Cyr, C. Bonanni, J. Bowes, and J. Ilsever. 2005. Beyond trust: Website design preferences across cultures. Journal of Global Information Management 13, 4, 25--54. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Cyr, M. Head, and A. Ivanov. 2006. Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information 8 Management 43, 8, 950--963. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.08.009 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Cyr, M. Head, and H. Larios. 2010. Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies 68, 1--2, 1--21. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Donyaee, A. Seffah, and J. Rilling. 2006. Exploring the correlations between predictive usability measures and user test. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Product Measurement (MENSURA’06).Google Scholar
- G. Fernandes, G. Lindgaard, R. Dillon, and J. Wood. 2003. Judging the appeal of Web sites. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on the Management of Electronic Commerce. 15--17.Google Scholar
- F. Fu, S. Y. Chiu, and C. H. Su. 2007. Measuring the screen complexity of Web pages. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Human Interface: Part II. 720--729. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- W. O. Galitz. 2007. The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
- J. Hartmann, A. Sutcliffe, and A. De Angeli. 2008. Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 4, Article No. 15. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Hasler and S. E. Suesstrunk. 2003. Measuring colorfulness in natural images. In Proceedings of SPIE/IS8T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Vol. 5007. 87--95. DOI:10.1117/12.477378 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Hassenzahl. 2008. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4, 319--349. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Hassenzahl and A. Monk. 2010. The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 3, 235--260. DOI:10.1080/07370024.2012.500139Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky. 2006. User experience—a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 25, 2, 91--97. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. L. Hintze. 2007. Stepwise regression. In NCSS Statistical System User's Guide III: Regression and Curve Fitting. NCSS, Kaysville, UT, 197--207.Google Scholar
- D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel. 1979. Brain mechanism of vision. Scientific American 241, 3, 150--162. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- T. Jacobsen and L. Höfel. 2002. Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills 95, 755--766. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Kurosu and K. Kashimura. 1995. Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95). ACM, New York, NY, 292--293. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/223355.223680Google Scholar
- T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of Web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 3, 269--298. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- H. Leder, B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and D. Augustin. 2004. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95, 489--508. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- H. Leder and M. Nadal. 2014. Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode—developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology 105, 4, 443--464. DOI:10.1111/bjop.1208Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- G. Lindgaard, C. Dudek, D. Sen, I. Sumegi, and P. Noonan. 2011. An exploitation of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction 18, 1, 1--30. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. Lindgaard, G. Fernandes, C. Dudek, and J. M. Brown. 2006. Attention Web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour and Information Technology 25, 2, 115--126. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Y. Liu. 2003. Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology. Ergonomics 46, 13--14, 1273--1292. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001610829 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Lok, S. Feiner, and G. Ngai. 2004. Evaluation of visual balance for automated layout. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interaction. 101--108. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Mahlke. 2002. Factors influencing the experience of Website usage. In Proceedings of the CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’02). ACM, New York, NY, 846--847. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/506443.506628Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Mahlke. 2008a. Visual aesthetics and the user experience. In The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction, M. Hassenzahl, G. Lindgaard, A. Platz, and N. Tractinsky (Eds.). Schloss, Dagstuhl, Germany, 1--6.Google Scholar
- S. Mahlke. 2008b. User Experience of Interaction with Technical Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- M. V. Mankeliunas. 1980. Los modelos en psicofísica. En Psicología de la percepción, A. Ardila (dir.). Mexico.Google Scholar
- MinGW. 2015. Minimalist GNU for Windows: A Native Windows Port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). Retrieved January 14, 2016, from http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/.Google Scholar
- F. Moksony. 1990. Small is beautiful. The use and interpretation of R2 in social research. Szociologiai Szemle (Special Issue) 130--138.Google Scholar
- M. Moshagen, J. Musch, and A. S. Göritz. 2009. A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects on visual aesthetics on performance. Ergonomics 52, 10, 1311--1320. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130903061717 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Moshagen and M. T. Thielsch. 2010. Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 10, 689--709. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Moshagen and M. T. Thielsch. 2013. A short version of the visual aesthetics of Websites inventory. Behaviour and Information Technology 32, 12, 1305--1311. DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2012.694910 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- MPEG ISO/IEC. 2000. ISO/IEC CD 15938 (1-6) Information Technology. Multimedia Content Description Interface: Part 1-6 ISO/IEC JTC/SC29/WG11/N3701-N3706. MPEG, La Baule, France.Google Scholar
- K. Mullet and D. Sano. 1996. Designing visual interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 28, 2, 82--83. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/226650.570118 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Nebeling, F. Matulic, and M. C. Norrie. 2011. Metrics for the evaluation of news site content layout in large-screen contexts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 1511--1520. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979164Google Scholar
- NetMarketshare. n.d. Home Page. Retrieved November 12, 2015, from https://netmarketshare.com.Google Scholar
- D. C. L. Ngo, A. Samsudin, and R. Abdullah. 2000. Aesthetics measures for assessing graphic screens. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 16, 1, 97--116.Google Scholar
- D. C. L. Ngo, L. S. Teo, and J. G. Byrne. 2003. Modeling interface aesthetics. Information Sciences 152, 1, 25--46. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00404-8 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- D. A. Norman. 2004. Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4, 311--318. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_1 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Oliva and A. Torralba. 2006. Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research 155, 23--36. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Pajusalu. 2012. The Evaluation of User Interface Aesthetics. Master's Thesis. Institute of Informatics, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
- J. W. Palmer. 2002. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research 13, 2, 151--167. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- E. Papachristos and N. Avouris. 2011. Are first impressions about Websites only related to visual appeal? In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume Part I (INTERACT’11). 489--496. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- H. C. Purchase, J. Hamer, A. Jamieson, and O. Ryan. 2011. Investigating objective measures of Web page aesthetics and usability. In Proceedings of the 12th Australasian User Interface Conference, Volume 17 (AUIC’11). 19--28.Google Scholar
- J. Redish, R. G. Bias, R. Bailey, R. Molich, J. Dumas, and J. M. Spool. 2002. Usability in practice: Formative usability evaluations—evolution and revolution. In Proceedings of the CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’02). ACM, New York, NY, 885--890. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/506443.506647Google Scholar
- K. Reinecke and K. Z. Gajos. 2014. Quantifying visual preferences around the world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 11--20. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557052 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Reinecke, T. Yeh, L. Miratrix, R. Mardiko, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, and K. Z. Gajos. 2013. Predicting users’ first impressions of Website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2049--2058. DOI:http://dx.doi.org 10.1145/2470654.2481281Google Scholar
- D. Robins and J. Holmes. 2008. Aesthetics and credibility in Web site design. Information Processing and Management 44, 1, 386--399. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- V. Roto, E. Law, A. Vermeeren, and J. Hoonhout. 2011. User experience white paper. In Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience.Google Scholar
- R. Rosenholtz, Y. Li, J. Mansfield, and Z. Jin. 2005. Feature congestion: A measure of display clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM, New York, NY, 761--770. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055078Google Scholar
- P. Salembier and T. Sikora. 2002. Introduction to MPEG-7: Multimedia Content Description Interface. B. S. Manjunath (Ed.). John Wiley 8 Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- F. Sánchez, M. Barrilero, S. Uribe, F. Álvarez, A. Tena, and J. M. Menéndez. 2012. Social and content hybrid image recommender system for mobile social networks. Mobile Networks and Applications 17, 6, 782--795. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11036-012-0399-6 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Sears. 1993. Layout appropriateness: A metric for evaluating user interface widget layouts. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19, 7, 707--719. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Shackel. 2009. Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with Computers 21, 5--6, 339--346. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Z. Shan and W. Hai-Tao. 2008. Image retrieval based on bit-plane distribution entropy. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Science and Software Engineering. 532--535. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.270 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- P. J. Silvia. 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Sonderegger and J. Sauer. 2010. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics 41, 3, 403--410. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Speicher, A. Both, and M. Gaedke. 2015. S.O.S.: Does your search engine results page (SERP) need help? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). 1005--1014.Google Scholar
- J. Stevens. 1996. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Strebe. 2011. Visual aesthetics of Websites: The visceral level of perception and its influence on user behaviour. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL’11). 523--526.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Pearson, Boston, MA. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. T. Thielsch, I. Blotenberg, and R. Jaron. 2014. User evaluation of Websites: From first impression to recommendation. Interacting with Computers 26, 1, 89--102. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. T. Thielsch, R. Engel, and G. Hirschfeld. 2015. Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experience usability. PeerJ Computer Science 1, e19. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Thüring and S. Mahlke. 2007. Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology 42, 4, 253--264. DOI:10.1080/00207590701396674Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- TNS. 2008. Digital World, Digital Life: Snapshots of Our Online Behavior and Perspectives Around the World. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from http://www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/TNS_Market_Research_Digital_World_Digital_Life.pdf.Google Scholar
- N. Tractinsky. 1997. Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97). ACM, New York, NY, 115--122. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258549.258626 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- N. Tractinsky, A. Cokhavi, M. Kirschenbaum, and T. Sharfi. 2006. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of Web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 11, 1071--1083. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009Google Scholar
Digital Library
- N. Tractinsky, A. S. Katz, and D. Ikar. 2000. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 2, 127--145. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. N. Tuch, E. E. Presslaber, M. Stöcklin, K. Opwis, and J. A. Bargas-Avila. 2012a. The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of Websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 11, 794--811. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.003 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- An N. Tuch, S. P. Roth, K. Hornbæk, K. Opwis, and J. A. Bargas-Avila. 2012b. Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 5, 1596--1607. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.024 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Vanderdonckt and X. Gillo. 1994. Visual techniques for traditional and multimedia layouts. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’94). ACM, New York, NY, 95--104. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/192309.192334 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Xie. 2003. The basics of visual perception. In Fundamentals of Robotics: Linking Perception to Action. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 446--450. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Webby Awards. 2015. Home Page. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from http://www.webbyawards.com/.Google Scholar
- H. Weinreich, H. Obendorf, E. Herder, and M. Mayer. 2008. Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use. ACM Transactions on the Web 2, 1, Article No. 5. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1326561.1326566 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. N. Wilkinson and C. E. Rogers. 1973. Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 22, 3, 392--399. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/2346786 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. M. Zain, M. Tey, and G. Ying Soon. 2008. Using aesthetic measurement application (AMA) to measure aesthetics of Web page interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2008 4th International Conference on Natural Computation, Volume 6 (ICNC’08). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 96--100. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICNC.2008.764 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Zen and J. Vanderdonckt. 2014. Towards an evaluation of graphical user interfaces aesthetics based on metrics. In Proceedings of the IEEE 8th Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS’14). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--6. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Q. Zhang, W. Kang, C. Zhao, and X. Ming. 2009. Aesthetic coloring for complex layout using genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2009 WRI Global Congress on Intelligent Systems (GCIS’09). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 406--410. DOI:10.1109/GCIS.2009.15 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- X. S. Zheng, I. Chakraborty, J. Jeng-Weei Lin, and R. Rauschenberger. 2009. Correlating low-level image statistics with users—rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of Web pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. DOI:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518703Google Scholar
Index Terms
User's Web Page Aesthetics Opinion: A Matter of Low-Level Image Descriptors Based on MPEG-7
Recommendations
Aesthetics and credibility in web site design
Web sites often provide the first impression of an organization. For many organizations, web sites are crucial to ensure sales or to procure services within. When a person opens a web site, the first impression is probably made in a few seconds, and the ...
The effect of aesthetics on web credibility
BCS-HCI '09: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and TechnologyCredibility influences a user's interest in a web site. Once users perceive the credibility of a web site they will be more likely to use it. A combination of factors affects such credibility -- such as the provider, content, aesthetics, accessibility ...
Estimation of user interest in visited web page
WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide webNowadays web portals contain large amount of information that is meant for various visitors or groups of visitors. To effectively navigate within the content the website needs to "know" its users in order to provide personalized content to them. We ...






Comments