skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Analyzing the Adoption and Cascading Process of OSN-Based Gifting Applications: An Empirical Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 April 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

To achieve growth in the user base of online social networks--(OSN) based applications, word-of-mouth diffusion mechanisms, such as user-to-user invitations, are widely used. This article characterizes the adoption and cascading process of OSN-based applications that grow via user invitations. We analyze a detailed large-scale dataset of a popular Facebook gifting application, iHeart, that contains more than 2 billion entries of user activities generated by 190 million users during a span of 64 weeks. We investigate (1) how users invite their friends to an OSN-based application, (2) how application adoption of an individual user can be predicted, (3) what factors drive the cascading process of application adoptions, and (4) what are the good predictors of the ultimate cascade sizes. We find that sending or receiving a large number of invitations does not necessarily help to recruit new users to iHeart. We also find that the average success ratio of inviters is the most important feature in predicting an adoption of an individual user, which indicates that the effectiveness of inviters has strong predictive power with respect to application adoption. Based on the lessons learned from our analyses, we build and evaluate learning-based models to predict whether a user will adopt iHeart. Our proposed model that utilizes additional activity information of individual users from other similar types of gifting applications can achieve high precision (83%) in predicting adoptions in the target application (i.e., iHeart). We next identify a set of distinctive features that are good predictors of the growth of the application adoptions in terms of final population size. We finally propose a prediction model to infer whether a cascade of application adoption will continue to grow in the future based on observing the initial adoption process. Results show that our proposed model can achieve high precision (over 80%) in predicting large cascades of application adoptions. We believe our work can give an important implication in resource allocation of OSN-based product stakeholders, for example, via targeted marketing.

References

  1. AppData. 2013. AppData—Application Analytics for Facebook, iOS and Google Play. Retrieved from http://www.appdata.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sinan Aral, Lev Muchnik, and Arun Sundararajan. 2009. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 51 (2009), 21544--21549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sinan Aral and Dylan Walker. 2012. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337, 6092 (2012), 337--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. BBC News. 2012. Facebook and Zynga to End Close Relationship. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-20554441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eytan Bakshy, Itamar Rosenn, Cameron Marlow, and Lada Adamic. 2012. The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jon Berry and Ed Keller. 2003. The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy. Free Press. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2010. Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Meeyoung Cha, Alan Mislove, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2009. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the Flickr social network. In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Justin Cheng, Lada Adamic, P. Alex Dow, Jon Michael Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014. Can cascades be predicted? In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tom Fawcett. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27, 8 (Jun. 2006), 861--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Minas Gjoka, Michael Sirivianos, Athina Markopoulou, and Xiaowei Yang. 2008. Poking Facebook: Characterization of OSN applications. In Proceedings of Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN’08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sharad Goel, Duncan J. Watts, and Daniel G. Goldstein. 2012. The structure of online diffusion networks. In Proceedings of ACM EC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. I. Goh and A. L. Barabási. 2008. Burstiness and memory in complex systems. Europhys. Lett. 81, 4 (2008), 48002+.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sandra González-Bailón, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Alejandro Rivero, and Yamir Moreno. 2011. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1, 197 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jinyoung Han, Daejin Choi, A-Young Choi, Jiwon Choi, Taejoong Chung, Ted ”Taekyoung” Kwon, Jong-Youn Rha, and Chen-Nee Chuah. 2015. Sharing topics in pinterest: Understanding content creation and diffusion behaviors. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (COSN’15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jinyoung Han, Daejin Choi, Byung-Gon Chun, Ted Taekyoung Kwon, Hyun-chul Kim, and Yanghee Choi. 2014. Collecting, organizing, and sharing pins in Pinterest: Interest-driven or social-driven? In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Robert A. Hanneman and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Elizabeth A. Harris. 2013. Retailers Seek Partners in Social Networks. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/27/technology/retailers-seek-partners-in-social-networks.html?hp8_r=18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiwan Jeong and Sue Moon. 2014. Invite your friends and get rewards: Dynamics of incentivized friend invitation in kakaotalk mobile games. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (COSN’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zsolt Katona, Peter Pal Zubcsek, and Miklos Sarvary. 2011. Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Market. Res. 48, 3 (2011), 425--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. B. Kirman, Shaun Lawson, and C. Linehan. 2009. Gaming on and off the social graph: The social structure of facebook games. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Maksim Kitsak, Lazaros K. Gallos, Shlomo Havlin, Fredrik Liljeros, Lev Muchnik, H. Eugene Stanley, and Hernan A. Makse. 2010. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 6, 11 (2010), 888--893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andrey Kupavskii, Liudmila Ostroumova, Alexey Umnov, Svyatoslav Usachev, Pavel Serdyukov, Gleb Gusev, and Andrey Kustarev. 2012. Prediction of retweet cascade size over time. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Haewoon Kwak, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. K. Lerman and R. Ghosh. 2010. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yung-Ming Li, Han-Wen Hsiao, and Yi-Lin Lee. 2013. Recommending social network applications via social filtering mechanisms. Inf. Sci. 239 (2013), 18--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Albert M. Liebetrau. 1983. Measures of Association. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/9780585180977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Han Liu, Atif Nazir, Jinoo Joung, and Chen-Nee Chuah. 2013. Modeling/predicting the evolution trend of OSN-based applications. In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Huan Liu and Rudy Setiono. 1995. Chi2: Feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes. In Proceedings of IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27 (2001), 415--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Atif Nazir, Alex Waagen, Vikram S. Vijayaraghavan, Chen-Nee Chuah, Raissa M. D’Souza, and Balachander Krishnamurthy. 2012. Beyond friendship: Modeling user activity graphs on social network-based gifting applications. In Proceedings of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Rezaur Rahman, Jinyoung Han, and Chen-Nee Chuah. 2015. Unveiling the adoption and cascading process of OSN-based gifting applications. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mohammad Rezaur Rahman, Pierre-André Noël, Chen-Nee Chuah, Balachander Krishnamurthy, Raissa M. D’Souza, and S. Felix Wu. 2014. Peeking into the invitation-based adoption process of OSN-based applications. Comput. Commun. Rev. 44, 1 (2014), 20--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tiago Rodrigues, Fabrício Benevenuto, Meeyoung Cha, Krishna Gummadi, and Virgílio Almeida. 2011. On word-of-mouth based discovery of the web. In Proceedings of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC’11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Amanda Sorribes, Beatriz G. Armendariz, Diego Lopez-Pigozzi, Cristina Murga, and Gonzalo G. de Polavieja. 2011. The origin of behavioral bursts in decision-making circuitry. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, 6 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gabor Szabo and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2010. Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM 53, 8 (2010), 80--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Dashun Wang, Zhen Wen, Hanghang Tong, Ching-Yung Lin, Chaoming Song, and Albert-László Barabási. 2011. Information spreading in context. In Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. D. J. Watts and P. S. Dodds. 2007. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Cons. Res. 34 (2007), 441--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Xiao Wei, Jiang Yang, Lada A. Adamic, Ricardo Matsumura de Araújo, and Manu Rekhi. 2010. Diffusion dynamics of games on online social networks. In Proceedings of Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN’10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Jaewon Yang and Jure Leskovec. 2010. Modeling information diffusion in implicit networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing the Adoption and Cascading Process of OSN-Based Gifting Applications: An Empirical Study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!