10.1145/3027063.3052547acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Invisible: A Critical Digital Artwork as Performance

Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper demonstrates Invisible, a critical digital artwork as performance in a conceptual framework derived from performance studies. Invisible exemplifies how digital art can reflect and influence critical thinking by focusing on three key features of performance studies: constitutive, epistemic, and critical. This intersects with Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) in a digital art context, which addresses inspirational roles of digital art.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

suppl.mov

Supplemental video

References

  1. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Mike Craven, Graham Walker, Tim Regan, Jason Morphett, and John Wyver. 2000. Inhabited Television: Broadcasting Interaction from within Collaborative Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 4: 510--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Augusto Boal. 1993. Theatre of the Oppressed. Theatre Communications Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertolt Brecht. 1977. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Hill and Wang.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Charlie Gere. 2008. New Media Art and the Gallery in the Digital Age, in New Media in the White Cube and Beyond. University of California Press, 13--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hye Yeon Nam and Michael Nitsche. 2014. Interactive installations as performance: inspiration for HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14), 189--196. http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/2540930.2540976Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christiane Paul. 2003. Digital Art. Thames&Hudson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Richard Schechner. 2002. Performance Studies: An Introduction. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jennifer G. Sheridan, Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2008. Designing for Performative Tangible Interaction. Int. J. Arts and Technology, 1: 288--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jennifer G. Sheridan, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Alice Bayliss. 2007. Encouraging Witting Participation and Performance in Digital Live Art. In Proc. BCSHCI, 13--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Roberto Simanowski. 2011. Digital Art and Meaning. University of Minnesota Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Victor Turner. 1980. Social Dramas and Stories About Them. Critical Inquiry, 7, 1: 141--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Invisible: A Critical Digital Artwork as Performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!