10.1145/3055399.3055477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An SDP-based algorithm for linear-sized spectral sparsification

Published:19 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

For any undirected and weighted graph G=(V,E,w) with n vertices and m edges, we call a sparse subgraph H of G, with proper reweighting of the edges, a (1+ε)-spectral sparsifier if

(1-ε)xTLGxxT LH x≤(1+ε)xTLGx

holds for any xΕℝn, where LG and LH are the respective Laplacian matrices of G and H. Noticing that Ω(m) time is needed for any algorithm to construct a spectral sparsifier and a spectral sparsifier of G requires Ω(n) edges, a natural question is to investigate, for any constant ε, if a (1+ε)-spectral sparsifier of G with O(n) edges can be constructed in Ο(m) time, where the Ο notation suppresses polylogarithmic factors. All previous constructions on spectral sparsification require either super-linear number of edges or m1+Ω(1) time.

In this work we answer this question affirmatively by presenting an algorithm that, for any undirected graph G and ε>0, outputs a (1+ε)-spectral sparsifier of G with O(n2) edges in Ο(mO(1)) time. Our algorithm is based on three novel techniques: (1) a new potential function which is much easier to compute yet has similar guarantees as the potential functions used in previous references; (2) an efficient reduction from a two-sided spectral sparsifier to a one-sided spectral sparsifier; (3) constructing a one-sided spectral sparsifier by a semi-definite program.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

d3_sb_t1.mp4

References

  1. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yin Tat Lee, and Lorenzo Orecchia. 2016. Using optimization to obtain a width-independent, parallel, simpler, and faster positive SDP solver. In 27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’16). 1824– 1831. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Zhenyu Liao, and Lorenzo Orecchia. 2015. Spectral Sparsification and Regret Minimization Beyond Multiplicative Updates. In 47th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’15). 237–245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Joshua D. Batson, Daniel A. Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Twice-Ramanujan Sparsifiers. SIAM J. Comput. 41, 6 (2012), 1704–1721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joshua D. Batson, Daniel A. Spielman, Nikhil Srivastava, and Shang-Hua Teng. 2013. Spectral sparsification of graphs: theory and algorithms. Commun. ACM 56, 8 (2013), 87–94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. András Benczúr and David Karger. 1996. Approximating s-t Minimum Cuts in O (n 2 ) Time. In 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’96). 47–55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Paul Chew. 1989. There Are Planar Graphs Almost as Good as the Complete Graph. J. Comput. System Sci. 39, 2 (1989), 205–219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michael B Cohen, Yin Tat Lee, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, Richard Peng, and Aaron Sidford. 2015. Uniform sampling for matrix approximation. In 6th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS’15). 181–190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rahul Jain and Penghui Yao. 2011. A parallel approximation algorithm for positive semidefinite programming. In 52th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’11). 463–471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rasmus Kyng, Yin Tat Lee, Richard Peng, Sushant Sachdeva, and Daniel A. Spielman. 2016. Sparsified Cholesky and multigrid solvers for connection Laplacians. In 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’16). 842–850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yin Tat Lee and He Sun. 2015. Constructing Linear-Sized Spectral Sparsification in Almost-Linear Time. In 56th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’15). 250–269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mu Li, Gary L Miller, and Richard Peng. 2013. Iterative row sampling. In 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13). 127–136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jelani Nelson and Huy L Nguyên. 2013. OSNAP: Faster numerical linear algebra algorithms via sparser subspace embeddings. In 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13). 117–126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Richard Peng and Daniel A. Spielman. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. An efficient parallel solver for SDD linear systems. In 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’14). 333–342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Richard Peng and Kanat Tangwongsan. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Faster and simpler widthindependent parallel algorithms for positive semidefinite programming. In 24th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA’12). 101– 108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daniel A. Spielman and Nikhil Srivastava. 2011. Graph Sparsification by Effective Resistances. SIAM J. Comput. 40, 6 (2011), 1913–1926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. 2011. Spectral sparsification of graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 40, 4 (2011), 981–1025. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An SDP-based algorithm for linear-sized spectral sparsification

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC 2017: Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
        June 2017
        1268 pages
        ISBN:9781450345286
        DOI:10.1145/3055399

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!