skip to main content
10.1145/3064663.3064671acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"MyEyes": The Design and Evaluation of First Person View Video Streaming for Long-Distance Couples

Published:10 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Couples in Long Distance Relationships (LDRs) often rely on the use of video chat systems to help maintain their relationship. However, designs are typically limited to only supporting face-to-face conversations or providing narrow fields of view. We designed and evaluated MyEyes, a First Person View (FPV) video streaming technology probe made with cardboard goggles and a smartphone. Distance-separated partners see each other's view on their screen where it can overlap their own view (Overlapped), be placed above it (Horizontal), or presented at the same time where each is seen with a different eye (Split). We compared the three different views with couples to explore the effect on social presence and body ownership. The Overlapped View was most preferred by couples and it provided the strongest feeling of co-presence, whereas a Horizontal View provided the greatest sense of mutual understanding. Our qualitative results showed couples valued performing synchronized acts together and doing activities "in" the remote location.

References

  1. Uddipana Baishya and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. In Your Eyes: Anytime, Anywhere Video and Audio Streaming for Couples. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 84--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Jenn Gregg. 2001. The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In 4th annual international workshop on presence, Philadelphia, PA, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K. Burgoon. 200 Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence 12, 5: 456--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Matthew Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669: 756--756.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Philo Tan Chua, R. Crivella, B. Daly, Ning Hu, R. Schaaf, D. Ventura, T. Camill, J. Hodgins, and R. Pausch. 2003. Training for physical tasks in virtual environments: Tai Chi. In IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings., 87--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michael C. Corballis. 1995. Visual integration in the split brain. Neuropsychologia 33, 8: 937--959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marcello Costantini and Patrick Haggard. 200 The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 16, 2: 229--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Henrik Ehrsson, Nicholas P. Holmes, and Richard E. Passingham. 2005. Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 45: 10564--10573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Daniel Gooch and Leon Watts. 2011. A Design Framework for Mediated Personal Relationship Devices. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (BCS-HCI '11), 237--242. Retrieved January 16, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2305316.2305360 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daniel Gooch and Leon Watts. 2012. YourGloves, Hothands and Hotmits: Devices to Hold Hands at a Distance. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12), 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hiroyuki Iizuka, Daisuke Kondo, Hiroki Kawasaki, Hideyuki Ando, and Taro Maeda. 2011. Coordinated Behavior Between Visually Coupled Dyads. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Augmented Human International Conference (AH '11), 23:1--23:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kori Inkpen, Brett Taylor, Sasa Junuzovic, John Tang, and Gina Venolia. 20 Experiences2Go: Sharing Kids' Activities Outside the Home with Remote Family Members. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 1329--1340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yeong Rae Joi, Beom Taek Jeong, Jin Hwang Kim, Ki Hyuk Park, Taehyun Lee, and Jun Dong Cho. 2015. WearLove: Affective Communication via Wearable Device with Gamification. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15), 559--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shunichi Kasahara, Mitsuhito Ando, Kiyoshi Suganuma, and Jun Rekimoto. 2016. Parallel Eyes: Exploring Human Capability and Behaviors with Paralleled First Person View Sharing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1561--1572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shunichi Kasahara and Jun Rekimoto. 2015. JackIn Head: Immersive Visual Telepresence System with Omnidirectional Wearable Camera for Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '15), 217--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Kawasaki, H. Iizuka, S. Okamoto, H. Ando, and T. Maeda. 2010. Collaboration and skill transmission by first-person perspective view sharing system. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 125--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jina Kim, Young-Woo Park, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2015. BreathingFrame: An Inflatable Frame for Remote Breath Signal Sharing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15), 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hideaki Kuzuoka. 1992. Spatial Workspace Collaboration: A SharedView Video Support System for Remote Collaboration Capability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), 533--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hideaki Kuzuoka, Toshio Kosuge, and Masatomo Tanaka. 1994. GestureCam: A Video Communication System for Sympathetic Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '94), 35--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lara Maister, Mel Slater, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Manos Tsakiris. 2015. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 1: 6--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Valerie Manusov. 2006. Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships - by Laura Stafford. Journal of Communication 56, 3: 630--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Antonella Maselli and Mel Slater. 2013. The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Michael Massimi and Carman Neustaedter. 2014. Moving from Talking Heads to Newlyweds: Exploring Video Chat Use During Major Life Events. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Carman Neustaedter and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Intimacy in Long-distance Relationships over Video Chat. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 753--762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Valeria I. Petkova and H. Henrik Ehrsson. 2008. If I Were You: Perceptual Illusion of Body Swapping. PLoS ONE 3, 12: e3832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, Yee Loong Ooi, Alissa N. Antle, and Brendan Matkin. 2017. Flex-N-Feel: The Design and Evaluation of Emotive Gloves for Couples to Support Touch Over Distance. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 98--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Charles Spence, Alan Kingstone, David I. Shore, and Michael S. Gazzaniga. 2016. Representation of Visuotactile Space in the Split Brain. Psychological Science. Retrieved December 16, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Laura Stafford and Daniel J. Canary. 1991. Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational Characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8, 2: 217--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Laura Stafford, Andy J. Merolla, and Janessa D. Castle. 2006. When long-distance dating partners become geographically close. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 23, 6: 901--919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Manos Tsakiris. 2010. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48, 3: 703--712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "MyEyes": The Design and Evaluation of First Person View Video Streaming for Long-Distance Couples

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2017
      1444 pages
      ISBN:9781450349222
      DOI:10.1145/3064663

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader