10.1145/3067665.3067680acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedings
research-article

Simulation Module and Tools for XDense Sensor Network

ABSTRACT

We present a ns-3 module developed for wired 2D mesh grid sensor network systems, that resemble Network-on-Chip architectures. It has been designed to enable complex feature extraction from sensed data in realtime with distributed processing. We provide the design specifications, communication and processing delay models and a high level system model for XDense using ns-3. We validate our module by comparing its performance with a hardware implementation.

References

  1. A. Berns and E. Obermeier. 2009. AeroMEMS Sensor Arrays for Time Resolved Wall Pressure and Wall Shear Stress Measurements. In Imaging Measurement Methods for Flow Analysis. Springer, 227--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. U. Buder, R. Petz, M. Kittel, W. Nitsche, and E. Obermeier. 2008. AeroMEMS Polyimide Based Wall Double Hot-Wire Sensors for Flow Separation Detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 142, 1 (2008), 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Cai and D. Gajski. 2003. Transaction Level Modeling: An Overview. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Cai, S. Verma, and D. Gajski. 2003. Comparison of Specfic and SystemC Languages for System Design. CECS, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, Tech. Rep (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. N Cattafesta III and M. Sheplak. 2011. Actuators for Active Flow Control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 43 (2011), 247--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Ganesan, A. Cerpa, W. Ye, Y. Yu, J. Zhao, and D. Estrin. 2004. Networking Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 64, 7 (2004), 799--814. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Kasagi, Y. Suzuki, and K. Fukagata. 2009. Microelectromechanical Systems-Based Feedback Control of Turbulence for Skin Friction Reduction. Annual review of fluid mechanics 41 (2009), 231--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N K. Kavaldjiev and G. J. M. Smit. 2003. A Survey of Efficient On-Chip Communications for SoC. http://eprints.eemcs.utwente.nl/833/. In 4th PROGRESS Symposium on Embedded Systems, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. Technology Foundation STW, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Kopsaftopoulos, R. Nardari, Y. Li, P. Wang, and F. Chang. 2015. State Sensing and Awareness for a Bio-inspired Intelligent Composite UAV Wing. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Kumar, A. Jantsch, J-P Soininen, M. Forsell, M. Millberg, J. Oberg, K. Tiensyrja, and A. Hemani. 2002. A Network-on-Chip Architecture and Design Methodology. In 2002 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI 2002). 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Loureiro, V. Gupta, N. Pereira, E. Tovar, and R. Rangarajan. 2013. XDense: A Sensor Network for Extreme Dense Sensing. Proceedings of the Work-In-Progress Session at the 2013 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (2013), 19--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Loureiro, R. Rangarajan, and E. Tovar. 2015. Demo Abstract: Towards the Development of XDense, A Sensor Network for Dense Sensing. 12th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN) (2015), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Loureiro, R. Rangarajan, and E. Tovar. 2015. Distributed Sensing of Fluid Dynamic Phenomena with the XDense Sensor Grid Network. In 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications (CPSNA 2015). 54--59. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Maillet-Contoz and F. Ghenassia. 2005. Transaction Level Modeling. In Transaction Level Modeling with SystemC. Springer, 23--55. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-26233-4_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Medardoni. 2009. Driving the Network-on-Chip Revolution to Remove the Interconnect Bottleneck in Nanoscale Multi-Processor Systems-on-Chip. Ph.D. Dissertation. Università degli studi di Ferrara.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Olofsson, T. Nordstrm, and Z. Ul-Abdin. 2014. Kickstarting High-Performance Energy-Efficient Manycore Architectures With Epiphany. In 2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 1719--1726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. F. Palacios, J. Alonso, K. Duraisamy, M. Colonno, J. Hicken, A. Aranake, A. Campos, S. Copeland, T. Economon, A. Lonkar, and others. 2013. Stanford University Unstructured (SU 2): An Open-Source Integrated Computational Environment for Multi-Physics Simulation and Design. In 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!