Protein design by multiobjective optimization: evolutionary and non-evolutionary approaches

ABSTRACT

Traditional simulation-based protein design considers energy minimization of candidate conformations as a singleobjective combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper we consider a challenging protein design problem, producing twelve protein species based on collagen that uniquely assort into four groups of three: a problem defined herein as a 4-level heterotrimer. We formulate a bi-objective combinatorial minimization problem that targets both stability and specificity of the 4-level heterotrimer. In order to approximate its Pareto frontier, we utilize both evolutionary and non-evolutionary approaches, operating in either Pareto or aggregation fashions. Our practical observations suggest that the SMS-EMOA with Evolution Strategies' operators is more effective than standard heuristics deployed in computational protein design, such as Simulated Annealing, Replica Exchange or the Canonical Genetic Algorithm. We investigate the attained Pareto optimal sets using Barrier Tree analysis, aiming to provide insights into the chemical search-space, as well as to explain the observed algorithmic trends. In particular, we identify Replica Exchange as a promising non-evolutionary technique for this problem class, due to its efficient exploration capabilities. Overall, a common high-level protocol for simultaneous landscape analysis of evolutionary and non-evolutionary search methodologies is put forward for the first time.

References

1. Thomas Bäck. 1996. Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
2. J Bella, M Eaton, B Brodsky, and HM Berman. 1994. Crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like peptide at 1.9 A resolution. Science 266, 5182 (1994), 75--81.
3. Nicola Beume, Boris Naujoks, and Michael Emmerich. 2007. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective Selection Based on Dominated Hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research 181 (2007), 1653--1669.
4. F. Calvo. 2009. Non-genetic global optimization methods in molecular science: An overview. Computational Materials Science 45, 1 (2009), 8 -- 15.
5. David E. Clark (Ed.). 2000. Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design. Willey-VCH, Weinheim.
6. Indraneel Das and John Dennis. 1997. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multucriteria optimization problems. Structural Optimization 14 (1997), 63--69.
7. Kalyanmoy Deb. 2015. Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Chapter Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms, 995--1015.
8. William F. DeGrado, Christopher M. Summa, Vincenzo Pavone, Flavia Nastri, and Angela Lombardi. 1999. De Novo Design and Structural Characterization of Proteins and Metalloproteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry 68 (1999), 779--819.
9. David J. Earl and Michael W. Deem. 2005. Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 (2005), 3910--3916. Issue 23.
10. Jorge A. Fallas and Jeffrey D. Hartgerink. 2012. Computational design of self-assembling register-specific collagen heterotrimers. Nature Communications 3 (2012), 1087.
11. David Fleishman, Sarel and Baker. 2012. Role of the Biomolecular Energy Gap in Protein Design, Structure, and Evolution. Cell 149 (2012), 262--273. Issue 2.
12. Bernd Hartke. 2004. Application of Evolutionary Algorithms to Global Cluster Geometry Optimization. Structure and Bonding 110 (2004), 33--53.
13. H.W. Hellinga and F.M. Richards. 1994. Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 (1994), 5803--5807. Issue 13.
14. Po-Ssu Huang, Scott E. Boyken, and David Baker. 2016. The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature 537 (2016), 320--327. Issue 7620.
15. Brian Kuhlman, Gautam Dantas, Gregory C. Ireton, Gabriele Varani, Barry L. Stoddard, and David Baker. 2003. Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy. Science 302, 5649 (2003), 1364--1368.
16. Andrew Leaver-Fay, Ron Jacak, P. Benjamin Stranges, and Brian Kuhlman. 2011. A Generic Program for Multistate Protein Design. PLos ONE 6, 7 (07 2011), 1--17.
17. Yaohang Li, Charlie E.M. Strauss, and Andrey Gorin. 2004. Parallel tempering in rosetta practice. In Proceedings of International Conference on Bioinformatics and its Applications (ICBA '04).
18. J. Machta. 2009. Strengths and weaknesses of parallel tempering. Phys. Rev. E 80 (Nov 2009), 056706. Issue 5.
19. Katherine M. Malan and Andries P. Engelbrecht. 2013. A survey of techniques for characterising fitness landscapes and some possible ways forward. Information Sciences 241 (2013), 148 -- 163.
20. Enzo Marinari and Giorgio Parisi. 1992. Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 19, 6 (1992), 451.
21. Michael Masin and Yossi Bukchin. 2008. Diversity maximization approach for multiobjective optimization. Operations Research 56, 2 (2008), 411--424.
22. Vikas Nanda and Ronald L. Koder. 2010. Designing artificial enzymes by intuition and computation. Nature Chemistry 2 (2010), 15--24. Issue 1.
23. Lucas Gregorio Nivón, Rocco Moretti, and David Baker. 2013. A Pareto-Optimal Refinement Method for Protein Design Scaffolds. PLoS ONE 8, 4 (2013), e59004.
24. OpenAI. 2017. Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learning. Commun. ACM 60, 4 (2017).
25. Douglas H. Pike and Vikas Nanda. 2015. Empirical estimation of local dielectric constants: Toward atomistic design of collagen mimetic peptides. Peptide Science 104, 4 (2015), 360--370.
26. Edgar Reehuis and Thomas Bäck. 2010. Mixed-integer evolution strategy using multiobjective selection applied to warehouse design optimization. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1187--1194.
27. Günter Rudolph. 2012. Handbook of Natural Computing: Theory Experiments, and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, Chapter Evolutionary Strategies, 673--698.
28. Andrea Toffolo and Ernesto Benini. 2003. Genetic Diversity As an Objective in Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms. Evol. Comput. 11, 2 (May 2003), 151--167.
29. Leonardo Vanneschi, Andrea Valsecchi, and Riccardo Poli. 2009. Limitations of the Fitness-proportional Negative Slope Coefficient As a Difficulty Measure. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1877--1878.
30. David J. Wales and Mark A. Miller. 1998. Archetypal energy landscapes. Nature 394 (1998), 758 -- 760. Issue 6695.
31. Shira Warszawski, Ravit Netzer, Dan S. Tawfik, and Sarel Fleishman. 2014. A "Fuzzy"-Logic Language for Encoding Multiple Physical Traits in Biomolecules. Journal of Molecular Biology 426, 24 (2014), 4125 -- 4138.
32. Michael T. Wolfinger, Sebastian Will, Ivo L. Hofacker, Rolf Backofen, and Peter F. Stadler. 2006. Exploring the lower part of discrete polymer model energy landscapes. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 74, 4 (2006), 726.
33. Fei Xu, Teresita Silva, Mihir Joshi, Sohail Zahid, and Vikas Nanda. 2013. Circular Permutation Directs Orthogonal Assembly in Complex Collagen Peptide Mixtures. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288 (2013), 31616--31623. Issue 44.
34. Fei Xu, Sohail Zahid, Teresita Silva, and Vikas Nanda. 2011. Computational Design of a Collagen A:B:C-type Heterotrimer. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133 (2011), 15260--15263. Issue 39.
35. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. 2001. SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In Evolutionary Methods for Design Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, K. C. Giannakoglou, D. T. Tsahalis, J. Périaux, K. D. Papailiou, and T. Fogarty (Eds.). International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 95--100.