Developing a Framework for Evaluating the Sustainability of Computing Projects

ABSTRACT

Toyama [19] has proposed a "preliminary taxonomy" for classifying computing projects as a way of separating sustainable computing efforts from unsustainable ones. In this paper we explore the feasibility of Toyama's taxonomy. We begin by describing how we revised and developed his taxonomy to make it more practically useful and then conducted a pilot study where we used the revised version to evaluate four computing projects. The pilot study was then used as a foundation for further discussing and developing the revised taxonomy into yet another, third and final version which we have chosen to call the Sustainable Computing Evaluation Framework (SCEF). While our proposed framework (SCEF) is more practically useful than Toyama's "preliminary taxonomy", there are still challenges that need to be addressed and we end the paper by suggesting where future efforts could be focused.

References

1. Baumer, E. P., & Silberman, M. (2011, May). When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2271--2274). ACM.
2. Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., & Merideth, R. W. (1987). Global sustainability: toward definition. Environmental management, 11(6), 713--719.
3. Daly, H. E. (1977). Steady-state economics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
4. Daly, H. E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological economics, 2(1), 1--6.
5. Dobson, A. (1996). Environment sustainabilities: An analysis and a typology. Environmental Politics 5(3): 401--428.
6. Dobson, A. (2007). Green political thought (4th edition). Routledge
7. Druckman, A., Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., & Jackson, T. (2011). Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3572--3581.
8. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37--51.
9. Global e-sustainability initiative. (2015). "SMARTer 2030: ICT Solutions for the 21st Century"
10. Hilty, L. M. (2008). Information technology and sustainability. Essays on the Relationship between ICT and Sustainable Development. Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt.
11. Hilty, L., Lohmann, W., & Huang, E. (2011). Sustainability and ICT--an overview of the field. POLITEIA, 27(104), 13--28
12. Hilty, L., & Aebischer, B. (2015). ICT for Sustainability: An Emerging Research Field. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability (pp. 3--37). Springer International Publishing.
13. MacArthur, E. (2012). Towards the Circular Economy: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
14. Pargman, D., & Raghavan, B. (2014). Rethinking sustainability in computing: From buzzword to non-negotiable limits. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 638--647). ACM.
15. Pargman, D., Ahlsén, E., & Engelbert, C. (2016). Designing for sustainability: Breakthrough or suboptimisation?. In 4th International Conference ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S). Atlantis Press.
16. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
17. Strengers, Y. (2014). Smart energy in everyday life: Are you designing for resource man?. interactions, 21(4), 24--31.
18. Tainter, J. A. (2006). Social complexity and sustainability. ecological complexity, 3(2), 91--103.
19. Toyama, K. (2015). Preliminary thoughts on a taxonomy of value for sustainable computing. First Monday, 20(8).
20. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). New Society Publishers.
21. Walldius, Å., Gulliksen, J., & Sundblad, Y. (2015). Revisiting the UsersAward programme from a value sensitive design perspective. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 1--4). Aarhus University Press.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing industry

      • Sustainability