Advanced Computing for Social Change: Educating and Engaging Our Students to Compete in a Changing Workforce

ABSTRACT

Visualization taps into the very best capabilities of our brains, transforming data that is fundamentally abstract as numbers into something that communicates and illuminates information ranging from the simple to the complex. There is a growing interdependence amongst society, humanity, technology and science. Simultaneously, interdisciplinary science has taken a critical role in understanding and solving what has become a multi-faceted realm of large, complex problems. This is contrasted by a looming global workforce shortage in those educated in computational science. In response, we have developed a new model for engaging students, the advanced computing for social change initiative, teaching computational skills in the context of relevant social issues. This paper provides rationale for our inaugural challenge, including evaluation data and recommendations1.

References

1. Hariolf Grupp. 2017. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, http://www.e-elgar.com/shop/isbn/9781858987163
2. Scott Page. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400830282
3. Kenneth Gibbs Jr. 2014. Diversity in STEM: What it is and Why itMatters. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/diversity-in-stem-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters/
4. John D. Bransford (ed), Ann L. Brown (ed), Rodney R. Cocking (ed). 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press. http://doi.apa.org/psycinfo/1999-02807-000
5. Amir Raz, Jason Buhle. Typologies of attentional networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 7,5 (2006). 367--379
6. James Hartley, Ivor K Davies. Note-taking: A critical review. Innovations in Education & Training International 15,3 (1978). 207--224
7. Larry L Shirey. Importance, interest, and selective attention. The role of interest in learning and development (1992). 281--296
8. Colleen Shantz. 12 Brain/Mind Learning Principles in Action: The Fieldbook for Making Connections, Teaching, and the Human Brain. Teaching Theology and Religion 9,3 (2006). 189--190
9. Pamela R Cangelosi, Karen J Whitt. Teaching through storytelling: an exemplar. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 3,2 (2006).
10. Dawn M McBride, Barbara Anne Dosher. A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation analysis. Conscious. Cogn. 11,3 (2002). 423--460
11. Tor Endestad,; Svein Magnussen, Tore Helstrup. Memory for pictures and words following literal and metaphorical decisions. Imagin. Cogn. Pers. 23,2 (2003). 209--216
12. Georg Stenberg. Conceptual and perceptual factors in the picture superiority effect. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 18,6 (2006). 813--847
13. Connie Post, Emilo Lia, Nancy Ditomaso, Thomas Tirpak, Rajendra Borwankar. Capitalizing on thought diversity for innovation. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 1,39 (2011). 100--114
14. Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program (U.S.). 2016. The Federal Big Data Research and Development Strategic Plan. http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Federal_Big_Data_Research_and_Develo.html?hl=&id=5bBDvgAACAAJ
15. Robin I M Dunbar. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 6,5 (1998). 178--190
16. Kristin Flora, Jamie Bromley, Amy, Bracken. Using the Familiar to Teach the Unfamiliar: Active Learning Strategies in Research Methods.
17. Mel Silberman. 1996. Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach AnySubject. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 9780205178667
18. Chet Meyers, Thomas B Jones. 1993. Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. ISBN97815554252

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Visualization

    • Empirical studies in visualization

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computational thinking