skip to main content
research-article
Free Access
Best Paper

Input Controls for Entering Uncertain Data: Probability Distribution Sliders

Published:30 June 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Although more and more data is collected automatically, many interfaces still require manual input. When we, for example, enter our daily calorie intake or calculate our ecological footprint, we often have to guess the weight of the food or what distance we have covered with our car. In this paper, we propose a solution to overcome the problem of forcing users to enter a single value when they are unsure about the actual input. On the basis of a slider, we designed four input controls which allow the input of uncertain data in the form of probability distribution functions. To evaluate our input controls, we conducted two studies collecting subjective and objective feedback. Based on the evaluation, we derived implications for their usage. We additionally provide an open-source toolkit with the evaluated input controls that can be included in web applications and customized for different contexts and tasks.

References

  1. Nadia Boukhelifa and David J. Duke. 2009. Uncertainty Visualization: Why Might It Fail?. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4051--4056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Correll and Michael Gleicher. 2014. Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 12 (Dec 2014), 2142--2151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephen G. Eick. 1994. Data Visualization Sliders. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nivan Ferreira, Danyel Fisher, and Arnd Christian Konig. 2014. Sample-oriented Task-driven Visualizations: Allowing Users to Make Better, More Confident Decisions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 571--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nahum Gershon. 1998. Visualization of an imperfect world. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 18, 4 (Jul 1998), 43--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Miriam Greis, Thorsten Ohler, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Investigating Representation Alternatives for Communicating Uncertainty to Non-experts. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2015. Vol. 9299. 256--263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harald Ibrekk and M. Granger Morgan. 1987. Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People. Risk Analysis 7, 4 (1987), 519--529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Christopher H. Jackson. 2008. Displaying uncertainty with shading. The American Statistician 62, 4 (2008), 340--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chris. R. Johnson and Allen R. Sanderson. 2003. A Next Step: Visualizing Errors and Uncertainty. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 23, 5 (Sept 2003), 6--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Susan L. Joslyn and Jared E. LeClerc. 2012. Uncertainty forecasts improve weather-related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18, 1 (2012), 126--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Malte F. Jung, David Sirkin, Turgut M. Gür, and Martin Steinert. 2015. Displayed Uncertainty Improves Driving Experience and Behavior: The Case of Range Anxiety in an Electric Car. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2201--2210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Matthew Kay, Tara Kola, Jessica R. Hullman, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. When (Ish) is My Bus?: User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5092--5103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matthew Kay, Dan Morris, M.C. Schraefel, and Julie A. Kientz. 2013. There's No Such Thing As Gaining a Pound: Reconsidering the Bathroom Scale User Interface. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Matthew Kay, Shwetak N. Patel, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. How Good is 85Classifier Evaluation to Acceptability of Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anass Lasram, Sylvain Lefebvre, and Cyrille Damez. 2012. Scented Sliders for Procedural Textures. In EUROGRAPHICS short papers (Proceedings of the Eurographics conference (short papers)). Cagliari, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Isaac M. Lipkus, Greg Samsa, and Barbara K. Rimer. 2001. General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples. Medical Decision Making 21, 1 (2001), 37--44. arXiv:http://mdm.sagepub.com/content/21/1/37.full.pdf+htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alan M. MacEachren, Anthony Robinson, Susan Hopper, Steven Gardner, Robert Murray, Mark Gahegan, and Elisabeth Hetzler. 2005. Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32, 3 (2005), 139--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dawn M. Marsh-Richard, Erin S. Hatzis, CharlesW. Mathias, Nicholas Venditti, and Donald M. Dougherty. 2009. Adaptive Visual Analog Scales (AVAS): A modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales. Behavior Research Methods 41, 1 (2009), 99--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Justin Matejka, Michael Glueck, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. The Effect of Visual Appearance on the Performance of Continuous Sliders and Visual Analogue Scales. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5421--5432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rebecca E. Morss, Julie L. Demuth, and Jeffrey K. Lazo. 2008. Communicating Uncertainty in Weather Forecasts: A Survey of the U.S. Public. Weather and forecasting 23, 5 (2008), 974--991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chris Olston and Jock D. Mackinlay. 2002. Visualizing data with bounded uncertainty. In Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002. IEEE Symposium on. 37--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Masakazu Osada, Holmes Liao, and Ben Shneiderman. 1993. Alpha Slider: Searching Textual Lists with Sliders. (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Alex T. Pang, Craig M. Wittenbrink, and Suresh K. Lodha. 1997. Approaches to uncertainty visualization. The Visual Computer 13, 8 (1997), 370--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Florian Pappenberger, Elisabeth Stephens, Jutta Thielen, Peter Salamon, David Demeritt, Schalk Jan van Andel, Fredrik Wetterhall, and Lorenzo Alfieri. 2013. Visualizing probabilistic flood forecast information: expert preferences and perceptions of best practice in uncertainty communication. Hydrological Processes 27, 1 (2013), 132--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kristin Potter, Joe Kniss, Richard Riesenfeld, and Chris R. Johnson. 2010. Visualizing Summary Statistics and Uncertainty. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 3 (2010), 823--832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mark S. Roulston, Gary E. Bolton, Andrew N. Kleit, and Addison L. Sears-Collins. 2006. A laboratory study of the benefits of including uncertainty information in weather forecasts. Weather and Forecasting 21, 1 (2006), 116--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Julia Schwarz, Scott Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2010. A Framework for Robust and Flexible Handling of Inputs with Uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Orit Shaer, Oded Nov, Johanna Okerlund, Martina Balestra, Elizabeth Stowell, Lauren Westendorf, Christina Pollalis, Jasmine Davis, Liliana Westort, and Madeleine Ball. 2016. GenomiX: A Novel Interaction Tool for Self-Exploration of Personal Genomic Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 661--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Meredith Skeels, Bongshin Lee, Greg Smith, and George G. Robertson. 2010. Revealing Uncertainty for Information Visualization. Information Visualization 9, 1 (2010), 70--81. arXiv:http://ivi.sagepub.com/content/9/1/70.full.pdf+html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Susanne Tak, Alexander Toet, and Jan van Erp. 2014. The Perception of Visual Uncertainty Representation by Non-Experts. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 6 (June 2014), 935--943. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Judi Thomson, Elizabeth Hetzler, Alan MacEachren, Mark Gahegan, and Misha Pavel. 2005. A typology for visualizing uncertainty. Proc. SPIE 5669, 146--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas S. Wallsten, David V. Budescu, Amnon Rapoport, Rami Zwick, and Barbara Forsyth. 1986. Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 4 (1986), 348--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wesley Willett, Jeffrey Heer, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2007. Scented Widgets: Improving Navigation Cues with Embedded Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1129--1136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Craig M. Wittenbrink, Alex T. Pang, and Suresh K. Lodha. 1996. Glyphs for visualizing uncertainty in vector fields. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 2, 3 (Sep 1996), 266--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jianlong Zhou, Constant Bridon, Fang Chen, Ahmad Khawaji, and YangWang. 2015. Be Informed and Be Involved: Effects of Uncertainty and Correlation on User's Confidence in Decision Making. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 923--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Torre Zuk and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2006. Theoretical analysis of uncertainty visualizations. Proc. SPIE 6060, 606007--606007--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Input Controls for Entering Uncertain Data: Probability Distribution Sliders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!