The Influence of Personality on Mobile Web Credibility

ABSTRACT

Research has shown that the perceived credibility of a website is critical to its success. However, little is known about how individual differences influence this important factor of web design. In this paper, we investigate how personality traits affect the perceived credibility of a website in the mobile domain. Using a sample of 323 participants, we developed a model showing how the Big Five personality traits influence the perceived credibility of a website through its perceived aesthetics and perceived usability. Our model reveals that Agreeableness is the strongest predictor of aesthetics and/or usability, followed by Conscientiousness. This suggests that the more agreeable and/or the more conscientious users are easily more satisfied aesthetically and usability-wise by a mobile websites than the less agreeable and/or the less conscientious users respectively. Consequently, designers of mobile sites may have to do more in user interface design in order to attract the less agreeable and/or the less conscientious users to their sites based on its hedonic (aesthetics-inspired) and utilitarian (usability-inspired) appeal.

References

1. Bergkvist, L. and Rossiter, J.R. 2007. The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research. 44, 2 (2007), 175--184.
2. Constantinides, E. 2004. Influencing the online consumer's behavior: the Web experience. Internet research. 14, 2 (2004), 111--126.
3. Fayombo, G. 2010. The relationship between personality traits and psychological resilience among the Caribbean adolescents. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2, 2 (2010), 105--117.
4. Flanagin, A.J. and Metzger, M.J. 2003. The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior. 19, 6 (2003), 683--701.
5. Fogg, B.J. et al. 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (2003), 1--15.
6. Fogg, B.J. 2003. Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. CHI'03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (2003), 722--723.
7. Gosling, S.D. et al. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personlity domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, (2003), 504--528.
8. Van der Heijden, H. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management. 40, 6 (2003), 541--549.
9. Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International journal of human-computer studies. 60, 3 (2004), 269--298.
10. Lindgaard, G. et al. 2006. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology. 25, 2 (2006), 115--126.
11. Liu, C.-H. et al. 2010. The Influence of HCI Design Aesthetics on Website Creditability--Using on Online Banking Website Interfaces as an Example. Springer. (2010), 1--20.
12. Mahlke, S. 2002. Factors influencing the experience of website usage. CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. (2002), 846--847.
13. Oyibo, K. et al. 2016. An Empirical Analysis of the Perception of Mobile Website Interfaces and the Influence of Culture. Worshop on Personalization in Persuasive Technology (PPT'16) (Salzburg, Austria, 2016), 44--56.
14. Oyibo, K. et al. 2016. Gender Difference in the Credibility Perception of Mobile Websites: A Mixed Method Approach. User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP 2016) (2016), 1--10.
15. Oyibo, K. and Vassileva, J. 2016. The Interplay of Aesthetics, Usability and Credibility in Mobile Websites and the Moderation by Culture. Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Syatems (Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2016).
16. Oyibo, K. and Vassileva, J. 2017. What Drives Perceived Usability in Mobile Web Design: Classical or Expressive Aesthetics? 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Vancouver, 2017), 1--17.
17. Punnoose, A.C. 2012. Determinants of Intention to Use eLearning Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Information Technology Education. 11, (2012), 301--337.
18. Sanchez, G. 2013. PLS Path Modeling with R. R News. (2013), 235.
19. van Schaik, P. and Ling, J. 2009. The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 67, 1 (2009), 79--89.
20. Sutcliffe, A. and De Angeli, A. 2005. Assessing interaction styles in web user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2005 (2005), 405--417.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

      • User models

      • User studies