skip to main content
10.1145/3123024.3124417acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lessons learned using wi-fi and Bluetooth as means to monitor public service usage

Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Facets of urban public transport such as occupancy, waiting times, route preferences are essential to help deliver improved services as well as better information for passengers to plan their daily travel. The ability to automatically estimate passenger occupancy in near real-time throughout cities will be a step change in the way public service usage is currently estimated and provide significant insights to decision makers. The ever-increasing popularity and abundance of mobile devices with always-on Wi-Fi/Bluetooth interfaces makes Wi-Fi/Bluetooth sensing a promising approach for estimating passenger load. In this paper, we present a Wi-Fi/Bluetooth sensing system to detect mobile devices for estimating passenger counts using public transport. We present our findings on an initial set of experiments on a series of bus/tram journeys encapsulating different scenarios over five days in a UK metropolitan area. Our initial experiments show promising results and we present our plans for future large-scale experiments.

References

  1. Givoni, M. and Banister, D. eds., 2013. Moving towards low carbon mobility. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hickman, R., Hall, P. and Banister, D., 2013. Planning more for sustainable mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 33: 210--219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ceder, A., 1984. Bus frequency determination using passenger count data. Transportation Research Part A: General, 18(5--6): 439--453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shen, X., Feng, S., Li, Z. and Hu, B., 2016. Analysis of bus passenger comfort perception based on passenger load factor and in-vehicle time. SpringerPlus, 5(1): 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G., 2007. Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of public transportation, 10(3): 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A. and Rose, J.M., 2013. Crowding in public transport systems: effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 53: 36--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, A.B. and Vasconcelos, N., 2012. Counting people with low-level features and Bayesian regression. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(4): 2160--2177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fujisawa, S., Hasegawa, G., Taniguchi, Y. and Nakano, H., 2013. Pedestrian counting in video sequences based on optical flow clustering. International Journal of Image Processing, 7(1):1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernini, N., Bombini, L., Buzzoni, M., Cerri, P. and Grisleri, P., 2014, September. An embedded system for counting passengers in public transportation vehicles. In Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), IEEE/ASME 10th International Conference on (pp. 1--6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yan, L., Chao, L., Wei, P.K. and Tao, S., 2015. Crowd Counting Using Wireless Infrared Distance Sensors for Indoor Environments. In Informatics and Communication Technologies for Societal Development, 1--8. Springer India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oberli, C., Torres-Torriti, M. and Landau, D., 2010. Performance evaluation of UHF RFID technologies for real-time passenger recognition in intelligent public transportation systems. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 11(3):748--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Trépanier, M., Tranchant, N. and Chapleau, R., 2007. Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(1): 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Handte, M., Iqbal, M.U., Wagner, S., Apolinarski, W., Marrón, P.J., Navarro, E.M.M., Martinez, S., Barthelemy, S.I. and Fernández, M.G., 2014, March. Crowd Density Estimation for Public Transport Vehicles. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops (pp. 315--322).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kostakos, V., Camacho, T. and Mantero, C., 2013. Towards proximity-based passenger sensing on public transport buses. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 17(8): 1807--1816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stange, H., Liebig, T., Hecker, D., Andrienko, G. and Andrienko, N., 2011, November. Analytical workflow of monitoring human mobility in big event settings using bluetooth. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on indoor spatial awareness (pp. 51--58). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Weppner, J. and Lukowicz, P., 2013, March. Bluetooth based collaborative crowd density estimation with mobile phones. In Pervasive computing and communications (PerCom), 2013 IEEE international conference on (pp. 193--200).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Musa, A.B.M. and Eriksson, J., 2012, November. Tracking unmodified smartphones using wi-fi monitors. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems (pp. 281--294). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bonne, B., Barzan, A., Quax, P. and Lamotte, W., 2013, June. WiFiPi: Involuntary tracking of visitors at mass events. In World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium and Workshops on a (pp. 1--6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schauer, L., Werner, M. and Marcus, P., 2014, December. Estimating crowd densities and pedestrian flows using wi-fi and bluetooth. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (pp. 171--177). ICST. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Abedi, N., Bhaskar, A., Chung, E. and Miska, M., 2015. Assessment of antenna characteristic effects on pedestrian and cyclists travel-time estimation based on Bluetooth and WiFi MAC addresses. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 60: 124--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Oransirikul, T., Nishide, R., Piumarta, I. and Takada, H., 2014. Measuring Bus Passenger Load by Monitoring Wi-Fi Transmissions from Mobile Devices. Procedia Technology, 18: 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Lessons learned using wi-fi and Bluetooth as means to monitor public service usage

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2017
        1089 pages
        ISBN:9781450351904
        DOI:10.1145/3123024

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 September 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader