skip to main content
10.1145/3131473.3131477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

FLEX-MONROE: A Unified Platform for Experiments under Controlled and Operational LTE Settings

Published:20 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents FLEX-MONROE, a unique platform that facilitates achieving a thorough understanding of LTE networks, one that captures the status of current operational MBB networks and that also enables LTE performance improvements by allowing experimentation in an environment with controllable LTE parameters. Using this platform, we propose to investigate how variations in the LTE network parameters influence the network characteristics, which, in turn, translate to application performance metrics that represent the end-user experience. We argue that the FLEX-MONROE platform is crucial to understand, validate and ultimately improve how current operational MBB networks perform, towards providing guidelines for designing future 5G architectures. Furthermore, understanding the effects of low-level tweaks in network parameters in the LTE infrastructure on the application performance is critical to provide guidelines on how to improve the application performance in the current but also future MBB networks.

References

  1. Özgü Alay et al. 2016. Measuring and assessing mobile broadband networks with MONROE World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). IEEE, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Özgü Alay et al. 2017. Experience: An Open Platform for Experimentation with Commercial Mobile Broadband Networks. In Mobicom. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Athula Balachandran et al. 2014. Modeling web-quality of experience on cellular networks MobiCom. ACM, 213--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dv ziugas Baltr=unas et al. 2014. Measuring the Reliability of Mobile Broadband Networks Internet Measurment Conference (IMC). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gautam Bhanage et al. 2010. SplitAP: leveraging wireless network virtualization for flexible sharing of WLANs Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nina Bhatti et al. 2000. Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design. Computer Networks, Vol. 33, 1 (2000), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anna Bouch et al. 2000. Quality is in the eye of the beholder: meeting users' requirements for Internet quality of service. In SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems. ACM, 297--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michael Butkiewicz et al. 2011. Understanding website complexity: measurements, metrics, and implications Internet Measurement Conference (IMC). ACM, 313--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. FCC. 2013. 2013 Measuring Broadband America February Report. Technical Report. FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology and Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Fielding et al. 1999. Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616 (Draft Standard). (June. 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthias Hirth et al. 2015. Crowdsourced network measurements: Benefits and best practices. Computer Networks Vol. 90 (2015), 85--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mahmoud I Kamel et al. 2014. LTE wireless network virtualization: Dynamic slicing via flexible scheduling Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zahir Koradia et al. 2013. First Impressions on the State of Cellular Data Connectivity in India ACM DEV-4. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Christian Kreibich et al. 2010. Netalyzr: illuminating the edge network. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 246--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. Makris et al. 2015. Enabling open access to LTE network components; the NITOS testbed paradigm 1st IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ashkan Nikravesh et al. 2015. Mobilyzer: An open platform for controllable mobile network measurements International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 389--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. OOKLA. 2017. http://www.speedtest.net/. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. John P Rula et al. 2014. No one-size fits all: Towards a principled approach for incentives in mobile crowdsourcing Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Selenium. 2017. (2017). http://www.seleniumhq.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Sen et al. 2011. Can they hear me now?: A case for a client-assisted approach to monitoring wide-area wireless networks. In Proc. of IMC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Junaid Shaikh et al. 2010. Quality of Experience from user and network perspectives. Annals of Telecommunications Vol. 65 (2010), 47--57. Issue 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sierra-Wireless. 1997. https://www.sierrawireless.com/products-and-solutions/embedded-solutions/products/mc7455/. (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Joel Sommers and Paul Barford. 2012. Cell vs. WiFi: on the performance of metro area mobile connections Internet measurement conference (IMC). ACM, 301--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Srikanth Sundaresan et al. 2013. Measuring and migrating web-performance bottleneck in broadband access network IMC. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tektronix. 2009. Reduce Drive Test Costs and Increase Effectiveness of 3G Network Optimization. Technical Report. Tektronix Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. HAR Export Trigger. 2017. (2017). http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/har-export-triggerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiao Sophia Wang et al. 2013. Demystifying Page Load Performance with WProf.. In NSDI. 473--485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. FLEX-MONROE: A Unified Platform for Experiments under Controlled and Operational LTE Settings

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '17: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation & CHaracterization
        October 2017
        114 pages
        ISBN:9781450351478
        DOI:10.1145/3131473

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 October 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '17 Paper Acceptance Rate11of16submissions,69%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader