10.1145/313238.313295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Towards a digital library of popular music

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.S.F. Altschul, T.L. Madden, A.A. Sch~ affer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D.J. Lipman. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25:3389-3402, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.D. Bainbridge. Extensible Optical Music Recognition. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Univer-sity of Canterbury, NZ, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.D. Bainbridge and N. P. Carter. Automatic reading of music notation. In H. Bunke and P. S. P. Wang, edi-tors, Handbook on Optical Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, pages 583-603. World Sci-entific, Singapore, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.M. Christel, D. Winkler, and R. Taylor. Multimedia abstractions for a digital video library. In Proceedings of ACMDigital Libraries '97 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, July 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.J. W. Dunn and C. A. Mayer. VARIATIONS: A digi-tal music library system at Indiana University. In Pro-ceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Li-braries, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.D. Greenhaus. About the digital tradition. http://www.deltablues.com/, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.W.B. Hewlett and E. Selfridge-Field, editors. Melodic Similarity: concepts, procedures and applications. MIT Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.G. Lawton. Vendors battle over mobile-os market. IEEE Computer, 32(2):13-15, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.R.J. McNab, L.A. Smith, I.H. Witten, C.L. Henderson, and S.J. Cunningham. Towards the digital music li-brary: tune retrieval from acoustic input. In Proc Digi-tal Libraries '96, pages 11-18, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.R.J. McNab, I.H. Witten, and S.J. Boddie. A distributed digital library architecture incorporating different index styles. In Proc. IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, pages 36-45, Santa Barbara, California, 1998. IEEE Com-puter Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.D. Pruslin. Automatic Recognition of Sheet Music. Sc.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technol-ogy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, June 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.H. Schaffrath. The esac databases and mappet software. Computing in Musicology, 8, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.I.H. Witten, Z. Bray, M Mahoui, and W. Teahan. Text mining: a new frontier for lossless compression. In Proc. Data Compression Conference, Snowbird, Utah, 1999. (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.I.H. Witten, R.J. McNab, J. Jones, M. Apperley, D. Bainbridge, and S.J. Cunningham. Managing com-plxity in a distributed digital library. IEEE Computer, pages 74-79, February 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards a digital library of popular music

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              DL '99: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries
              August 1999
              274 pages
              ISBN:1581131453
              DOI:10.1145/313238

              Copyright © 1999 ACM

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 August 1999

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              DL '99 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 114 submissions, 20%Overall Acceptance Rate 95 of 346 submissions, 27%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader
            About Cookies On This Site

            We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

            Learn more

            Got it!