Abstract
With recent shifts from email to messaging apps for personal communication, many communication partners are no longer able to converse using multiple threads within one platform as they used to via email. Romantic couples are the most frequently messaged contacts on mobile and communicate about a wide range of topics with each other, need to make joint decisions, and may have several roles in relation to each other (e.g., spouse, co-parent). Through a 3-week field study with ten U.S. diverse couples we studied how couples use a messaging app that allows them to compartmentalize their conversations into multiple "channels" around topics of their choice. We detail how couples managed and used channels in daily life, and channels' strengths and limitations. We found that channels made couples feel more organized, and helped with finding content and keeping track of topics. However, it was sometimes difficult to choose or navigate channels. We discuss perceived impacts of channels on relationships (e.g., topic-switching during conflicts), and outline design opportunities for messaging apps.
- Annie Dayani Ahad and Syamimi Md Ariff Lim. 2014. Convenience or Nuisance?: The "WhatsApp" Dilemma. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155: 189--196.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Irwin Altman and Dalmas A Taylor. 1973. Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Abram Anders. 2016. Team Communication Platforms and Emergent Social Collaboration Practices. International Journal of Business Communication: 2329488415627273.Google Scholar
- Louise Barkhuus. 2009. Mobile Networked Text Communication: The Case of SMS and Its Influence on Social Interaction. In Mobile Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.Google Scholar
- Frank Bentley, Nediyana Daskalova, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2017. "If a person is emailing you, it just doesn't make sense": Exploring Changing Consumer Behaviors in Email. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Retrieved December 15, 2016 from Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Frank Bentley, Crysta Metcalf, and Gunnar Harboe. 2006. Personal vs. Commercial Content: The Similarities Between Consumer Use of Photos and Music. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 667--676. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Juan Pablo Carrascal and Karen Church. 2015. An In-Situ Study of Mobile App & Mobile Search Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2739--2748. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Marta E. Cecchinato, Abigail Sellen, Milad Shokouhi, and Gavin Smyth. 2016. Finding Email in a Multi-Account, Multi-Device World. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1200--1210. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Karen Church and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. What's Up with Whatsapp?: Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '13), 352--361. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sunny Consolvo, Frank Bentley, Eric Heckler, and Sayali Phatak. 2017. Mobile User Research: A Practical Guide. Morgan and Claypool. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Alvin Cooper and Leda Sportolari. 1997. Romance in Cyberspace: Understanding Online Attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 22, 1: 7--14.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Henriette Cramer and Maia L. Jacobs. 2015. Couples' Communication Channels: What, When & Why? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 709--712. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2000. Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US.Google Scholar
- Timothy Cyders and Audra Hilterbran. Classroom Integration of the Slack Team Collaboration Tool.Google Scholar
- Maeve Duggan. 2015. Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/Google Scholar
- Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems That Support Social Processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1: 59--83. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Xristine Faulkner and Fintan Culwin. 2005. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers 17, 2: 167--185. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Gachago, S. Strydom, P. Hanekom, S. Simons, and S. Walters. 2015. Crossing Boundaries: Lecturers' Perspectives on the Use of WhatsApp to Support Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice 37, 1: 172--187.Google Scholar
- Ilana Gershon. 2010. The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ilana Gershon. 2010. Media Ideologies: An Introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20, 2: 283--293.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jawaid A. Ghani and Satish P. Deshpande. 1994. Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human-Computer Interaction. The Journal of Psychology 128, 4: 381--391.Google Scholar
- Rebecca E. Grinter and Margery A. Eldridge. 2001. y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In ECSCW 2001, Wolfgang Prinz, Matthias Jarke, Yvonne Rogers, Kjeld Schmidt and Volker Wulf (eds.). Springer Netherlands, 219--238. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rebecca E. Grinter, Leysia Palen, and Margery Eldridge. 2006. Chatting with Teenagers: Considering the Place of Chat Technologies in Teen Life. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 4: 423--447. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rebecca Grinter and Margery Eldridge. 2003. Wan2Tlk?: Everyday Text Messaging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 441--448. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kajetan Hinner. Statistics of major IRC networks: methods and summary of user count. 2000 3, 4. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0008/count.phpGoogle Scholar
- Donna L. Hoffman and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing 60, 3: 50--68.Google Scholar
- Ahmad Abdullahi Ibrahim, Hadiza Hafiz, and Rabiu Garba Idris. 2015. Psychometric Properties of WhatsApp Use and Perceived Academic Performance: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. Journal of Creative Writing (ISSN 2410-6259) 1, 4: 57--64.Google Scholar
- Ellen Isaacs, Margaret Szymanski, Yutaka Yamauchi, James Glasnapp, and Kyohei Iwamoto. 2012. Integrating Local and Remote Worlds Through Channel Blending. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 617--626. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Maximilian J. Johnston, Dominic King, Sonal Arora, Nebil Behar, Thanos Athanasiou, Nick Sevdalis, and Ara Darzi. 2015. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery 209, 1: 45--51.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Aditya Johri. 2011. Look Ma, No Email!: Blogs and IRC As Primary and Preferred Communication Tools in a Distributed Firm. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '11), 305--308. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Quentin Jones, Mihai Moldovan, Daphne Raban, and Brian Butler. 2008. Empirical Evidence of Information Overload Constraining Chat Channel Community Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08), 323--332. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yong Ming Kow, Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Waikuen Cheng. 2016. Mediating the Undercurrents: Using Social Media to Sustain a Social Movement. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 3883--3894. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bin Lin, Alexey Zagalsky, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2016. Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW '16 Companion), 333--336. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rich Ling and Birgitte Yttri. 2002. Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Joseph F. McCarthy and danah m. boyd. 2005. Digital Backchannels in Shared Physical Spaces: Experiences at an Academic Conference. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05), 1641--1644. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sarah Mennicken and Elaine M. Huang. 2012. Hacking the Natural Habitat: An In-the-Wild Study of Smart Homes, Their Development, and the People Who Live in Them. In Pervasive Computing, Judy Kay, Paul Lukowicz, Hideyuki Tokuda, Patrick Olivier and Antonio Krüger (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 143--160. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bonnie A. Nardi, Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner. 2000. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00), 79--88. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kenton P. O'Hara, Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris. 2014. Everyday Dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14), 1131--1143. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jonathan Pettigrew. 2009. Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships. Marriage & Family Review 45, 6-8: 697--716.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pew Research Center. 2015. The Smartphone Difference. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/Google Scholar
- Artemio Ramirez and Kathy Broneck. 2009. "IM me": Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 26, 2--3: 291--314.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard P. Schuler, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, Julia M. Mayer, Stephen T. Ricken, and Quentin Jones. 2014. The Doing of Doing Stuff: Understanding the Coordination of Social Group-activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 119--128. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lauren E. Scissors and Darren Gergle. 2013. "Back and Forth, Back and Forth": Channel Switching in Romantic Couple Conflict. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 237--248. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- E. Shihab, Z. M. Jiang, and A. E. Hassan. 2009. Studying the use of developer IRC meetings in open source projects. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 147--156.Google Scholar
- Linda Klebe Trevino and Jane Webster. 1992. Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication: Electronic Mail and Voice Mail Evaluation and Impacts. Communication Research 19, 5: 539--573.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino, and Lisa Ryan. 1993. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9, 4: 411--426.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino, and Lisa Ryan. 1993. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9, 4: 411--426.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alexandra Weilenmann. 2003. "I Can't Talk Now, I'm in a Fitting Room": Formulating Availability and Location in Mobile-Phone Conversations. Environment and Planning A 35, 9: 1589--1605.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Richard West and Lynne Turner. 2006. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Faculty and Staff Books. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Diane Kholos Wysocki. 1998. Let Your Fingers Do the Talking: Sex on an Adult Chat-line. Sexualities 1, 4: 425--452.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
Recommendations
Interviewing over instant messaging
CHI EA '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInterviews often serve as the cornerstone of human-computer interaction research. As a research method, they can both be deeply valuable and distinctly challenging. Pragmatic challenges of interviews include the travel that may be required to meet face-...
Group Chat Ecology in Enterprise Instant Messaging: How Employees Collaborate Through Multi-User Chat Channels on Slack
CSCW1Despite the long history of studying instant messaging usage, we know very little about how today's people participate in group chat channels and interact with others inside a real-world organization. In this short paper, we aim to update the existing ...
“Oops...”: Mobile Message Deletion in Conversation Error and Regret Remediation
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMessage deletion in mobile messaging apps allows people to “unsay” things they have said. This paper explores how and why people use (or do not use) this feature within remediation strategies after a communication error is identified. We present ...






Comments