skip to main content
research-article

Multi-Channel Topic-Based Mobile Messaging in Romantic Relationships

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With recent shifts from email to messaging apps for personal communication, many communication partners are no longer able to converse using multiple threads within one platform as they used to via email. Romantic couples are the most frequently messaged contacts on mobile and communicate about a wide range of topics with each other, need to make joint decisions, and may have several roles in relation to each other (e.g., spouse, co-parent). Through a 3-week field study with ten U.S. diverse couples we studied how couples use a messaging app that allows them to compartmentalize their conversations into multiple "channels" around topics of their choice. We detail how couples managed and used channels in daily life, and channels' strengths and limitations. We found that channels made couples feel more organized, and helped with finding content and keeping track of topics. However, it was sometimes difficult to choose or navigate channels. We discuss perceived impacts of channels on relationships (e.g., topic-switching during conflicts), and outline design opportunities for messaging apps.

References

  1. Annie Dayani Ahad and Syamimi Md Ariff Lim. 2014. Convenience or Nuisance?: The "WhatsApp" Dilemma. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155: 189--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Irwin Altman and Dalmas A Taylor. 1973. Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Abram Anders. 2016. Team Communication Platforms and Emergent Social Collaboration Practices. International Journal of Business Communication: 2329488415627273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Louise Barkhuus. 2009. Mobile Networked Text Communication: The Case of SMS and Its Influence on Social Interaction. In Mobile Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank Bentley, Nediyana Daskalova, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2017. "If a person is emailing you, it just doesn't make sense": Exploring Changing Consumer Behaviors in Email. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Retrieved December 15, 2016 from Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Frank Bentley, Crysta Metcalf, and Gunnar Harboe. 2006. Personal vs. Commercial Content: The Similarities Between Consumer Use of Photos and Music. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Juan Pablo Carrascal and Karen Church. 2015. An In-Situ Study of Mobile App & Mobile Search Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2739--2748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marta E. Cecchinato, Abigail Sellen, Milad Shokouhi, and Gavin Smyth. 2016. Finding Email in a Multi-Account, Multi-Device World. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1200--1210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Karen Church and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. What's Up with Whatsapp?: Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '13), 352--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sunny Consolvo, Frank Bentley, Eric Heckler, and Sayali Phatak. 2017. Mobile User Research: A Practical Guide. Morgan and Claypool. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alvin Cooper and Leda Sportolari. 1997. Romance in Cyberspace: Understanding Online Attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 22, 1: 7--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Henriette Cramer and Maia L. Jacobs. 2015. Couples' Communication Channels: What, When & Why? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 709--712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2000. Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Timothy Cyders and Audra Hilterbran. Classroom Integration of the Slack Team Collaboration Tool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Maeve Duggan. 2015. Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems That Support Social Processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1: 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Xristine Faulkner and Fintan Culwin. 2005. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers 17, 2: 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Gachago, S. Strydom, P. Hanekom, S. Simons, and S. Walters. 2015. Crossing Boundaries: Lecturers' Perspectives on the Use of WhatsApp to Support Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice 37, 1: 172--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ilana Gershon. 2010. The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ilana Gershon. 2010. Media Ideologies: An Introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20, 2: 283--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jawaid A. Ghani and Satish P. Deshpande. 1994. Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human-Computer Interaction. The Journal of Psychology 128, 4: 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rebecca E. Grinter and Margery A. Eldridge. 2001. y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In ECSCW 2001, Wolfgang Prinz, Matthias Jarke, Yvonne Rogers, Kjeld Schmidt and Volker Wulf (eds.). Springer Netherlands, 219--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rebecca E. Grinter, Leysia Palen, and Margery Eldridge. 2006. Chatting with Teenagers: Considering the Place of Chat Technologies in Teen Life. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 4: 423--447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rebecca Grinter and Margery Eldridge. 2003. Wan2Tlk?: Everyday Text Messaging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 441--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kajetan Hinner. Statistics of major IRC networks: methods and summary of user count. 2000 3, 4. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0008/count.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Donna L. Hoffman and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing 60, 3: 50--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ahmad Abdullahi Ibrahim, Hadiza Hafiz, and Rabiu Garba Idris. 2015. Psychometric Properties of WhatsApp Use and Perceived Academic Performance: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. Journal of Creative Writing (ISSN 2410-6259) 1, 4: 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellen Isaacs, Margaret Szymanski, Yutaka Yamauchi, James Glasnapp, and Kyohei Iwamoto. 2012. Integrating Local and Remote Worlds Through Channel Blending. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 617--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Maximilian J. Johnston, Dominic King, Sonal Arora, Nebil Behar, Thanos Athanasiou, Nick Sevdalis, and Ara Darzi. 2015. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery 209, 1: 45--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Aditya Johri. 2011. Look Ma, No Email!: Blogs and IRC As Primary and Preferred Communication Tools in a Distributed Firm. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '11), 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Quentin Jones, Mihai Moldovan, Daphne Raban, and Brian Butler. 2008. Empirical Evidence of Information Overload Constraining Chat Channel Community Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08), 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yong Ming Kow, Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Waikuen Cheng. 2016. Mediating the Undercurrents: Using Social Media to Sustain a Social Movement. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 3883--3894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Bin Lin, Alexey Zagalsky, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2016. Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW '16 Companion), 333--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rich Ling and Birgitte Yttri. 2002. Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Joseph F. McCarthy and danah m. boyd. 2005. Digital Backchannels in Shared Physical Spaces: Experiences at an Academic Conference. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05), 1641--1644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sarah Mennicken and Elaine M. Huang. 2012. Hacking the Natural Habitat: An In-the-Wild Study of Smart Homes, Their Development, and the People Who Live in Them. In Pervasive Computing, Judy Kay, Paul Lukowicz, Hideyuki Tokuda, Patrick Olivier and Antonio Krüger (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 143--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bonnie A. Nardi, Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner. 2000. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kenton P. O'Hara, Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris. 2014. Everyday Dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14), 1131--1143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jonathan Pettigrew. 2009. Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships. Marriage & Family Review 45, 6-8: 697--716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Pew Research Center. 2015. The Smartphone Difference. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Artemio Ramirez and Kathy Broneck. 2009. "IM me": Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 26, 2--3: 291--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Richard P. Schuler, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, Julia M. Mayer, Stephen T. Ricken, and Quentin Jones. 2014. The Doing of Doing Stuff: Understanding the Coordination of Social Group-activities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lauren E. Scissors and Darren Gergle. 2013. "Back and Forth, Back and Forth": Channel Switching in Romantic Couple Conflict. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 237--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. E. Shihab, Z. M. Jiang, and A. E. Hassan. 2009. Studying the use of developer IRC meetings in open source projects. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 147--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Linda Klebe Trevino and Jane Webster. 1992. Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication: Electronic Mail and Voice Mail Evaluation and Impacts. Communication Research 19, 5: 539--573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino, and Lisa Ryan. 1993. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9, 4: 411--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino, and Lisa Ryan. 1993. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9, 4: 411--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Alexandra Weilenmann. 2003. "I Can't Talk Now, I'm in a Fitting Room": Formulating Availability and Location in Mobile-Phone Conversations. Environment and Planning A 35, 9: 1589--1605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Richard West and Lynne Turner. 2006. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Faculty and Staff Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Diane Kholos Wysocki. 1998. Let Your Fingers Do the Talking: Sex on an Adult Chat-line. Sexualities 1, 4: 425--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!