skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

It was Fun, but Did it Last?: The Dynamic Interplay between Fun Motives and Contributors' Activity in Peer Production

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Peer production communities often struggle to retain contributors beyond initial engagement. This may be a result of contributors' level of motivation, as it is deeply intertwined with activity. Existing studies on participation focus on activity dynamics but overlook the accompanied changes in motivation. To fill this gap, this study examines the interplay between contributors' fun motives and activity over time. We combine motivational data from two surveys of Wikipedia newcomers with data of two periods of editing activity. We find that persistence in editing is related to fun, while the amount of editing is not: individuals who persist in editing are characterized by higher fun motives early on (when compared to dropouts), though their motives are not related to the number of edits made. Moreover, we found that newcomers' experience of fun was reinforced by their amount of activity over time: editors who were initially motivated by fun entered a virtuous cycle, whereas those who initially had low fun motives entered a vicious cycle. Our findings shed new light on the importance of early experiences and reveal that the relationship between motivation and participation levels is more complex than previously understood.

References

  1. Sultana Lubna Alam and John Campbell. 2017. Temporal Motivations of Volunteers to Participate in Cultural Crowdsourcing Work. Information Systems Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Judd Antin and Coye Cheshire. 2010. Readers Are Not Free-riders: Reading As a Form of Participation on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 127--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Judd Antin, Coye Cheshire, and Oded Nov. 2012. Technology-mediated contributions: editing behaviors among new wikipedians. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ACM: 373--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ofer Arazy, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov, Johannes Daxenberger, Martina Balestra, and Coye Cheshire. 2017. On the "how" and "why" of emergent role behaviors in Wikipedia. In Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ofer Arazy and Oded Nov. 2010. Determinants of Wikipedia Quality: The Roles of Global and Local Contribution Inequality. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10), 233--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ofer Arazy, Oded Nov, Raymond Patterson, and Lisa Yeo. 2011. Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems 27, 4: 71--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. Functional Roles and Career Paths in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing ACM: 1092--1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Martina Balestra, Coye Cheshire, Ofer Arazy, and Oded Nov. 2017. Investigating the Motivational Paths of Peer Production Newcomers. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Laszlo Barabasi. 2003. Linked: The new science of networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christopher P. Barlett, Douglas A. Gentile, Craig A. Anderson, Kanae Suzuki, Akira Sakamoto, Ayuchi Yamaoka, and Rui Katsura. 2014. Cross-Cultural Differences in Cyberbullying Behavior A Short-Term Longitudinal Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45, 2: 300--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Patrick J. Bateman, Peter H. Gray, and Brian S. Butler. 2010. Research Note--The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities. Information Systems Research 22, 4: 841--854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Danah Boyd and Nicole Ellison. 2010. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. IEEE Engineering Management Review 3, 38: 16--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Susan Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work ACM: 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don'T Look Now, but We'Ve Created a Bureaucracy: The Nature and Roles of Policies and Rules in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 1101--1110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Boreum Choi, Kira Alexander, Robert E. Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2010. Socialization Tactics in Wikipedia and Their Effects. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia and Dario Taraborelli. 2015. MoodBar: Increasing new user retention in Wikipedia through lightweight socialization. arXiv:1409.1496 {physics}: 734--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Doug Clow. 2013. MOOCs and the Funnel of Participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '13), 185--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Edward Deci and Richard M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Marko Sarstedt, Christoph Fuchs, Petra Wilczynski, and Sebastian Kaiser. 2012. Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40, 3: 434--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Regina van den Eijnden, Gert-Jan Meerkerk, Ad A. Vermulst, Renske Spijkerman, and Rutger Engels. 2008. Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 44, 3: 655--665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rosta Farzan, Saiph Savage, and Claudia Flores Saviaga. 2016. Bring on Board New Enthusiasts! A Case Study of Impact of Wikipedia Art + Feminism Edit-A-Thon Events on Newcomers. In Social Informatics, 24--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ben Fincham. 2016. The Sociology of Fun. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Robert Franzese and Cindy Kam. 2009. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris Hansen, William Hurwitz, and William Madow. 1953. Sample Survey Methods and Theory. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Alexander Hars and Shaosong Ou. 2001. Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 9 pp.-. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tao Hu, Robin Poston, and William Kettinger. 2011. Nonadopters of online social network services: Is it easy to have fun yet. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 29, 1: 441--458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kristen Isakson and Patricia Jarvis. 1999. The Adjustment of Adolescents During the Transition into High School: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28, 1: 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. James Jaccard and Robert Turrisi. 2003. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Bert Klandermans and Dirk Oegema. 1987. Potentials, Networks, Motivations, and Barriers: Steps Towards Participation in Social Movements. American Sociological Review 52, 4: 519--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Peter Kollock. 1998. Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 183--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Peter Kollock and Marc Smith. 2002. Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Richard C. LaBarba. 2013. Foundations of Developmental Psychology. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Karim Lakhani and Robert G. Wolf. 2003. Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved January 7, 2016 from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=443040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Cliff Lampe, Rick Wash, Alcides Velasquez, and Elif Ozkaya. 2010. Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1927--1936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Tak Yeon Lee, Casey Dugan, Werner Geyer, Christian Ratchford, Jamie Rasmussen, Sadat Shami, and Stela Lupushor. 2013. Experiments on Motivational Feedback for Crowdsourced Workers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Herman Luyten and Willy Lens. 1981. The effect of earlier experience and reward contingencies on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion 5, 1: 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jonathan T. Morgan, Siko Bouterse, Heather Walls, and Sarah Stierch. 2013. Tea and Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 839--848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Niall Bolger and Jean-Philippe Laurenceau. 2013. Methodology in the social sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Blair Nonnecke and Jennifer Preece. 2001. Why Lurkers Lurk. In AMCIS 2001 Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2001/294Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Oded Nov. 2007. What motivates wikipedians' Communications of the ACM 50, 11: 60--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Oded Nov, Ofer Arazy, and David Anderson. 2011. Dusting for Science: Motivation and Participation of Digital Citizen Science Volunteers. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (iConference '11), 68--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Gal Oestreicher-Singer and Lior Zalmanson. 2013. Content or Community? A Digital Business Strategy for Content Providers in the Social Age. Management Information Systems Quarterly 37, 2: 591--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Shaul Oreg and Oded Nov. 2008. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5: 2055--2073. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren Terveen. 2009. Wikipedians Are Born, Not Made: A Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia. 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Linda M. Petlichkoff. 1992. Youth Sport Participation and Withdrawal: Is It Simply a Matter of FUN? Pediatric Exercise Science 4, 2: 105--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Jennifer Preece and Ben Shneiderman. 2009. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 13--32. http://aisel.aisnet.org/thci/vol1/iss1/5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jenny Preece, Blair Nonnecke, and Dorine Andrews. 2004. The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior 20, 2: 201--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. M. Jordan Raddick, Georgia Bracey, Pamela L. Gay, Chris J. Lintott, Phil Murray, Kevin Schawinski, Alexander S. Szalay, and Jan Vandenberg. 2010. Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. John R Rossiter. 2002. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19, 4: 305--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Dana Rotman, Jennifer Preece, Jen Hammock, Kezee Procita, Derek Hansen, Cynthia Parr, Darcy Lewis, and David Jacobs. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology 25, 1: 54--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul Sackett and James Larson. 1990. Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 419--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Joachim Schroer and Guido Hertel. 2009. Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-Based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians and Why They Do It. Media Psychology 12, 1: 96--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Kennon M. Sheldon and Andrew J. Elliot. 1998. Not all Personal Goals are Personal: Comparing Autonomous and Controlled Reasons for Goals as Predictors of Effort and Attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24, 5: 546--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Deb Sledgianowski and Songpol Kulviwat. 2008. Social network sites: antecedents of user adoption and usage. In AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2008/83Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Na Sun, Patrick Pei-Luen Rau, and Liang Ma. 2014. Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 38: 110--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Masamichi Takahashi, Masakazu Fujimoto, and Nobuhiro Yamasaki. 2003. The Active Lurker: Influence of an In-house Online Community on Its Outside Environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '03), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Ravi Thambusamy, Mitchell Church, Hamid Nemati, and Jesse Barrick. 2010. Socially Exchanging Privacy for Pleasure: hedonic Use of Computer-Mediated Social Networks. In ICIS. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/253Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Eileen Trotter and Carole A. Roberts. 2006. Enhancing the early student experience. Higher Education Research & Development 25, 4: 371--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Robert J. Vallerand and Robert Blssonnette. 1992. Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivational Styles as Predictors of Behavior: A Prospective Study. Journal of Personality 60, 3: 599--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Youcheng Wang and Daniel R. Fesenmaier. 2004. Modeling Participation in an Online Travel Community. Journal of Travel Research 42, 3: 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. John P. Wanous, Arnon E. Reichers, and Michael J. Hudy. 1997. Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 2: 247--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Molly McLure Wasko and Samer Faraj. 2005. Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 29, 1: 35--57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148667 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. David Zeitlyn. 2003. Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections. Research Policy 32, 7: 1287--1291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. 2010. The Economics of 90--9--1: The Gini Coefficient (with Cross Sectional Analyses). Lithium Community. Retrieved April 21, 2017 from https://community.lithium.com/t5/Science-of-Social-Blog/The-Economics-of-90--9--1-The-Gini-Coefficient-with-Cross/ba-p/5466Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. It was Fun, but Did it Last?: The Dynamic Interplay between Fun Motives and Contributors' Activity in Peer Production

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!