Abstract
The intrusiveness of Web tracking and the increasing invasiveness of digital advertising have raised serious concerns regarding user privacy and Web usability, leading a substantial chunk of the populace to adopt ad-blocking technologies in recent years. The problem with these technologies, however, is that they are extremely limited and radical in their approach, and they completely disregard the underlying economic model of the Web, in which users get content free in return for allowing advertisers to show them ads. Nowadays, with around 200 million people regularly using such tools, said economic model is in danger.
In this article, we investigate an Internet technology that targets users who are not, in general, against advertising, accept the trade-off that comes with the “free” content, but—for privacy concerns—they wish to exert fine-grained control over tracking. Our working assumption is that some categories of web pages (e.g., related to health or religion) are more privacy-sensitive to users than others (e.g., about education or science). Capitalizing on this, we propose a technology that allows users to specify the categories of web pages that are privacy-sensitive to them and block the trackers present on such web pages only. As tracking is prevented by blocking network connections of third-party domains, we avoid not only tracking but also third-party ads. Since users continue receiving ads on those web pages that belong to non-sensitive categories, our approach may provide a better point of operation within the trade-off between user privacy and the Web economy. To test the appropriateness and feasibility of our solution, we implemented it as a Web-browser plug-in, which is currently available for Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. Experimental results from the collected data of 746 users during one year show that only 16.25% of ads are blocked by our tool, which seems to indicate that the economic impact of the ad-blocking exerted by privacy-sensitive users could be significantly reduced.
- Adblock plus. 2016. Retrieved from https://adblockplus.org.Google Scholar
- Disconnect. 2016. Retrieved from https://disconnect.me/.Google Scholar
- Ghostery. 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ghostery.com.Google Scholar
- Iab tech lab publisher ad blocking primer. 2016. Technical report. http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/IABTechLab_Publisher_AdBlocking_Primer.pdf.Google Scholar
- Privacy badger. 2016. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/fr/privacybadger.Google Scholar
- Rip: Adblock plus. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.engadget.com/2016/02/12/rip-adblock-plus/.Google Scholar
- YourOnlineChoices. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.youronlinechoices.com/.Google Scholar
- Handbook on European data protection law. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Handbook_data_protection_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar
- A Way to Peace in the Adblock War. 2015. Retrieved from https://blogs.harvard.edu/vrm/2015/09/21/a-way-to-peace-in-the-adblock-war/.Google Scholar
- Acceptable Ads Manifesto. 2015. Retrieved from https://acceptableads.org/.Google Scholar
- DCN Consumer Ad Block Report. 2015. Retrieved from https://digitalcontentnext.org/blog/press/digital-content-next-research-indicates-33-of-consumers-likely-to-try-ad-blocking-software-in-next-three-months/.Google Scholar
- Firefox interest dashboard. 2015. Retrieved from https://github.com/mozilla/interest-dashboard/blob/master/refData/IAB.js.Google Scholar
- Getting LEAN with Digital Ad UX. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.iab.com/news/lean/.Google Scholar
- Profiling Adblockers. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/profiling-adblockers.Google Scholar
- The cost of Ad Blocking, PageFaire and Adobe Ad Blocking Report. 2015. Retrieved from http://downloads.pagefair.com/reports/2015_report-the_cost_of_ad_blocking.pdf.Google Scholar
- Tracking preference expression (DNT). 2015. Technical report. http://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/.Google Scholar
- Why Millennials Block Ads. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.dmnews.com/opinions/why-millennials-block-ads/article/475448/.Google Scholar
- Brave. 2016. Retrieved from https://brave.com/.Google Scholar
- Efficient 8 optional filtering of domains in Recursor 4.0.0. 2016. Retrieved from http://blog.powerdns.com/2016/01/19/efficient-optional-filtering-of-domains-in-recursor-4-0-0/.Google Scholar
- List of allowed third-party domains. 2016. Retrieved from https://myrealonlinechoices.inrialpes.fr/allowed_thirdparty_domains.json.Google Scholar
- Why do people block online ads? 2016. Retrieved from https://www.adspeed.com/Blog/people-block-online-ads-1844.html.Google Scholar
- L. Bentivogli, P. Forner, B. Magnini, and E. Pianta. 2004. Revising wordnet domains hierarchy: Semantics, coverage, and balancing. In Proceedings of the PostCOLING Workshop Multilingual and Linguistic Resources. 101--108. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Blanchfield. 2016. Adblocking goes mobile. Research report, PageFair.Google Scholar
- F. Chanchary and S. Chiasson. 2015. User perceptions of sharing, advertising, and tracking. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS’15). 53--67. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Cookson. 2015. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon pay to get around ad blocking tool. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/80a8ce54-a61d-11e4-9bd3-00144feab7de.html.Google Scholar
- Corpus of global web-based English. http://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe.Google Scholar
- J. Daudé, L. Padró, and G. Rigau. 2003. Validation and tuning of wordnet mapping techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP’03).Google Scholar
- S. Englehardt and A. Narayanan. 2016. Online tracking: A 1-million-site measurement and analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS’16) ACM. 1388--1401. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- T. Gerbet, A. Kumar, and C. Lauradoux. 2015. A privacy analysis of Google and Yandex safe browsing. Research report RR-8686, Inria.Google Scholar
- S. Goel, J. M. Hofman, and M. I. Sirer. 2012. Who does what on the web? A large-scale study of browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’12).Google Scholar
- A. Gonzalez-Agirre, E. Laparra, and G. Rigau. 2012. Multilingual central repository version 3.0: Upgrading a very large lexical knowledge base. In Proceedings of the Global WordNet Conference.Google Scholar
- M. Gundlach. 2016. AdBlock. Retrieved from https://getadblock.com/.Google Scholar
- A. Kae, K. Kan, V. K. Narayanan, and D. Yankov. 2011. Categorization of display ads using image and landing page features. In Proceedings of the ICDM Workshop on Large-Scale Data Mining: Theory and Applications. ACM. 1--8. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. B. Kristen Purcell and L. Rainie. 2016. Survey on search engine use. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/09/main-findings-11/.Google Scholar
- R. Kumar and A. Tomkins. 2010. A characterization of online browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’10). ACM, New York, NY. 561--570. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. G. Leon, B. Ur, Y. Wang, M. Sleeper, R. Balebako, R. Shay, L. Bauer, M. Christodorescu, and L. F. Cranor. 2013. What matters to users? Factors that affect users’ willingness to share information with online advertisers. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS’13). ACM, New York, NY. 7:1--7:12. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Magnini and G. Cavaglià. 2000. Integrating subject field codes into wordnet. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation (LREC’00), 1413--1418.Google Scholar
- C. D. Manning and H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Marti. 2016. Targeted Advertising Considered Harmful. Retrieved from http://zgp.org/targeted-advertising-considered-harmful/.Google Scholar
- W. Melicher, M. Sharif, J. Tan, L. Bauer, M. Christodorescu, and P. G. Leon. 2016. (Do not) track me sometimes: Users’ contextual preferences for web tracking. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Privacy Enhancing Technology (PETS’16), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). Springer-Verlag. 1--20.Google Scholar
- G. A. Miller. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM, 38(11):39--41. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- L. Olejnik, T. Minh-Dung, and C. Castelluccia. 2014. Selling off privacy at auction. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Network Distribution Systems and Security (SNDSS’14).Google Scholar
- P. Papadopoulos, N. Kourtellis, P. R. Rodriguez, and N. Laoutaris. 2017. If you are not paying for it, you are the product: How much do advertisers pay for your personal data? In arXiv: 1701.07058v2.Google Scholar
- G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM, 18(11):613--620. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Turow, J. King, C. J. Hoofnagle, A. Bleakley, and M. Hennessy. 2009. Americans reject tailored advertising and three activities that enable it. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1478214 orGoogle Scholar
- S. Whitbeck. 2015. RTB is growing like mad. is your mobile marketing keeping up? Technical report. http://liftoff.io/rtb-growing-like-mad-mobile-marketingkeeping.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Fine-Grained Control over Tracking to Support the Ad-Based Web Economy
Recommendations
MyAdChoices: Bringing Transparency and Control to Online Advertising
The intrusiveness and the increasing invasiveness of online advertising have, in the last few years, raised serious concerns regarding user privacy and Web usability. As a reaction to these concerns, we have witnessed the emergence of a myriad of ad-...
A course module on web tracking and privacy
InfoSec '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Information Security Curriculum Development ConferenceCompanies track users' online behavior for profit, using technologies such as browser cookies, flash cookies, AdID, and web beacons. This data is typically anonymous, but there are still privacy concerns. Users also may not know they are being tracked ...
A User-Centric Model for Supporting Web Services
ICCGI '07: Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technologythe wide deployment of Web services in wire line and wireless networks has resulted in the proliferation of user identities relying on which the trust between a user and a Web service can be established through identification and authentication. Since ...






Comments