research-article

Dependable Visual Light-Based Indoor Localization with Automatic Anomaly Detection for Location-Based Service of Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 August 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Indoor localization has become popular in recent years due to the increasing need of location-based services in mobile cyber-physical systems (CPS). The massive deployment of light emitting diodes (LEDs) further promotes the indoor localization using visual light. As a key enabling technique for mobile CPS, accurate indoor localization based on visual light communication remains nontrivial due to various non-idealities such as attenuation induced by unexpected obstacles. The anomalies of localization can potentially reduce the dependability of location-based services. In this article, we develop a novel indoor localization framework based on relative received signal strength. Most importantly, an efficient method is derived from the triangle inequality to automatically detect the abnormal LED lamps that are blocked by obstacles. These LED lamps are then ignored by our localization algorithm so that they do not bias the localization results, which improves the dependability of our localization framework. As demonstrated by the simulation results, the proposed techniques can achieve superior accuracy over the conventional approaches, especially when there exist abnormal LED lamps.

References

  1. K. Ali, T. Javed, H. S. Hassanein, and S. M. A. Oteafy. 2016. Non-audible acoustic communication and its application in indoor location-based services. In Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. Elgala, R. Mesleh, and H. Haas. 2009. Indoor broadcasting via white LEDs and OFDM. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 55, 3 (2009), 1127--1134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Jeter. 1986. Mathematical Programming: An Introduction to Optimization, Vol. 102. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. R. Jimenez, F. Zampella, and F. Seco. 2013. Light-matching: A new signal of opportunity for pedestrian indoor navigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’13). IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S.-Y. Jung, S. H., and C.-S. Park. 2011. TDOA-based optical wireless indoor localization using LED ceiling lamps. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 57, 4 (2011), 1592--1597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Kail, P. Maechler, N. Preyss, and A. Burg. 2014. Robust asynchronous indoor localization using LED lighting. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’14). IEEE, 1866--1870.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H.-S. Kim, D.-R. Kim, S.-H. Yang, Y.-H. Son, and S.-K. Han. 2013. An indoor visible light communication positioning system using a RF carrier allocation technique. Journal of Lightwave Technology 31, 1 (2013), 134--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y.-S. Kuo, P. Pannuto, K.-J. Hsiao, and P. Dutta. 2014. Luxapose: Indoor positioning with mobile phones and visible light. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 447--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. H. Lee, A. Y. Chen, C. C. Chiang, Y. S. A. Chen, and C. H. Liu. 2016. A preliminary design and implementation of location-based mobile advertising schemes with plot placement animation over a cyber-physical system. In Proceedings of International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA’16). Conference Publishing Services (CPS), 196--201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Lin, M. Chen, J. Deng, M. M. Hassan, and G. Fortino. 2016. Enhanced fingerprinting and trajectory prediction for IoT localization in smart buildings. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 13, 3 (2016), 1294--1307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Otsu. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics 9, 1 (1979), 62--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Pathak, X. Feng, P. Hu, and P. Mohapatra. 2015. Visible light communication, networking, and sensing: A survey, potential and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys 8 Tutorials 17, 4 (2015), 2047--2077.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Prince and T. Little. 2012. A two phase hybrid RSS/AoA algorithm for indoor device localization using visible light. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’12). IEEE, 3347--3352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Rahaim, G. B. Prince, and T. D. C. Little. 2012. State estimation and motion tracking for spatially diverse VLC networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Globecom Workshops. IEEE, 1249--1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Rajagopal, P. Lazik, and A. Rowe. 2014. Visual light landmarks for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, 249--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Ruppel, C. Klein, and C. Linnhoff-Popien. 2008. Indooria—A platform for proactive indoor location-based services. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference Exhibition 8 IndustryForum. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Saadi, L. Wattisuttikulkij, Y. Zhao, and P. Sangwongngam. 2013. Visible light communication: Opportunities, challenges and channel models. IEEE Communations Magazine 51, 12 (2013), 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Sahin, Y. Said Eroglu, B. Guvenc, N. Pala, and M. Yuksel. 2015. Hybrid 3-D localization for visible light communication systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology 33, 22 (2015), 4589--4599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. M. Vegni and M. Biagi. 2012. An indoor localization algorithm in a small-cell LED-based lighting system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’12). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. T. Q. Wang, Y. A. Sekercioglu, A. Neild, and J. Armstrong. 2013. Position accuracy of time-of-arrival based ranging using visible light with application in indoor localization systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology 31, 20 (2013), 3302--3308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. C. Yang and H.-R. Shao. 2015. WiFi-based indoor positioning. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 3 (2015), 150--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Yoshino, S. Haruyama, and M. Nakagawa. 2008. High-accuracy positioning system using visible LED lights and image sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium. IEEE, 439--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dependable Visual Light-Based Indoor Localization with Automatic Anomaly Detection for Location-Based Service of Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!