skip to main content
article
Free Access

Reexamining the introductory computer science course in liberal arts institutions

Published:01 February 1990Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 Curriculum Committee on Computer Science, "Curriculum '68, Recommendations for Academic Programs in Computer Science," Communications of the ACM, 11:3 (March, 1968), 151-197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Curriculum Committee on Computer Science, "Curriculum '78, Recommendations for the Undergraduate Program in Computer Science," Communications of the ACM, 22:3 (March, 1979), 147-166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Koffman, E., Miller, P. and Wardel, C., "Recommended Curriculum for CS 1, 1984," Communications of the ACM, 27:10 (October, 1984), 998- 1001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Gibbs, N. and Tucker, A., "Model Curriculum for a Liberal Arts Degree in Computer Science," Communications of the ACM, 29:3 (March, 1986), 202- 210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 Ourusoff, N., "What is Computer Science?" Communications of the ACM, 28:8 (August, 1985), 791- 792.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Denning, P., "What is Computer Science?" American Scientist, 73 (January-February, 1985), 16-19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 McCracken, D. "Ruminations on Computer Science Curricula," Communications of the ACM, 28:8 (August, 1987), 791-792.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Denning, P., Comer, D., Gries, D., Mulder, M., Tucker, A., Turner, J., and Young, P., "Computing as a Discipline," Communications of the ACM, 32:1 (January, 1989), 9-23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Dijkstra, E., "On the Cruelty of Really Teaching Computer Science," SIGCSE Bulletin, 21:1 (February, 1989), xxiv-xxxix.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Owens, B., "Some Reactions to the Proposals for Revision of Core Curriculum in Computer Science," The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 4:4 (March, 1989), 19-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Bagert, D., et al. "The increasing Role of Computer Theory in Undergraduate Curricula," SIGCSE Bulletin, 20:4 (December, 1988), 50-57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 Porter, H., Abernethy, K. and Allen, T. "An Alternative to CSI as the Introductory Course for Computer Science at Liberal Arts Institutions," Proceedings of the 27th ACM Southeast Regional Conference (April, 1989), 98-102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Tanenbaum, A., Structured Computer Organization. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ" Prentice-Hall, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reexamining the introductory computer science course in liberal arts institutions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
      ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 22, Issue 1
      Feb. 1990
      269 pages
      ISSN:0097-8418
      DOI:10.1145/319059
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      • cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '90: Proceedings of the twenty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
        February 1990
        270 pages
        ISBN:0897913469
        DOI:10.1145/323410

      Copyright © 1990 ACM

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 February 1990

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!