Internet of Things (IoT) as Assistive Technology: Potential Applications in Tertiary Education

ABSTRACT

The recent popularity of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the consumer space and Web of Things (WoT) work by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has led to a Curtin University research project that has investigated the use of IoT by people with disabilities in the education space. Potential education-related IoT solutions raised in the research include the delivery of smartboard materials directly to the student to ensure compatibility with assistive technologies, the use of consumer-based IoT to provide captions and the monitoring of lecturer and student engagement in real-time to improve education delivery. While these technical possibilities are not new in their own right, the key points of interest from this research are that the students with disabilities, despite their IoT knowledge being limited to the emerging consumer space, have proposed these solutions as a way to support their learning. In addition, the fact such solutions are yet to be implemented in mainstream education settings despite the technical ability to do so raises concerns about the widening educational gap unless more effort is made by manufacturers to provide practical real-world IoT classroom solutions. While the use of IoT in these contexts may be considered an assistive technology in its own right, issues of privacy, security, and interoperability need to be addressed. As such, it is imperative that the W3C WoT work in this area continues to provide guidance and further academic research is needed.

References

1. Abou-Zahra, S., Brewer, J., Cooper, M. 2017. Web Standards to Enable an Accessible and Inclusive Internet of Things (IoT). Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference, W4A 2017, April 2--4, 2017, Perth, Western Australia.
2. Appliance Design. 2000. LG Electronics introduces digital refrigerator. Retrieved from http://www.appliancedesign.com/articles/89516-lg-electronics-introduces-digital-refrigerator
3. Ashton, K. 2009. That 'Internet of Things' Thing. RFID Journal. http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986
4. Bradshaw, T., & Waters, R. 2017. The dash to connect the consumer. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/67a08388-d3f8-11e6-9341-7393bb2e1b51?mhq5j=e5
5. Choudary, S. P., & Narayanan, C. 2017. Who holds the key to the smart home? The Hindu Business Line. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/digital-shift-on-amazon-alexa-connected-homes/article9500062.ece
6. Domingo, M. C. 2011. An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 35(2), 584--596.
7. Dores, C., Reis, L., & Vasco Lopes, N. 2014. Internet of things and cloud computing. 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 18--21 June, 2014. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6877071/?reload=true
8. G3ICT. 2015. Internet of Things: New Promises for Persons with Disabilities. Global Initiative for Inclusive Information and Communications Technology. http://g3ict.org/resource_center/publications_and_reports/p/productCategory_books/subCat_2/id_335
9. Guinard, D. D. and Trifa, V. M. 2016. Building the Web of Things. Manning Publications. ISBN 978-1617292682
10. Gupta, M., Holloway, C., Heravi, B. M., & Hailes, S. (2015). A comparison between smartphone sensors and bespoke sensor devices for wheelchair accessibility studies. 2015 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP) 7--9 April. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7106900
11. Haouel J., Ghorbel H., Bargaoui H. 2016. Towards an IoT Architecture for Persons with Disabilities and Applications. In: Ahmed M., Begum S., Raad W. (eds) Internet of Things Technologies for HealthCare. Healthy IoT 2016. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 187. Springer, Cham
12. Hennig, N. 2016. Natural user interfaces and accessibility. Library Technology Reports, 52(3), 5--17. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/5969/7598
13. Hollier, S., et. al. 2017. Internet of Things (IoT) Education: Implications for Students with Disabilities. Curtin University.
14. International Telecommunications Union. 2012. ITU-T Y.2060 Overview of the Internet of things. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.2060-201206-I
15. Mitchell, N. 2016. The 2016 state of the speech technology industry. Speech Technology, 21(1), 29--41.
16. Rose, K., Eldridge, S., and Chapin, L. 2015. The Internet of Things: An Overview -- Understanding the Issues and Challenges of a More Connected World. The Internet Society (ISOC). https://www.internetsociety.org/iot
17. Uzelac, A., Gligoric, N., & Krco, S. 2015. A comprehensive study of parameters in physical environment that impact students' focus during lecture using Internet of Things. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 427--434.
18. World Health Organization. (2017). World report on disability. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

• General and reference

  • Document types

    • Computing standards, RFCs and guidelines

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Computing platforms

  • World Wide Web

• Networks

  • Network services

• Security and privacy

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Management of computing and information systems