skip to main content
10.1145/3195970.3196097acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

QoS-aware stochastic power management for many-cores

Published:24 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

A many-core processor can execute hundreds of multi-threaded tasks in parallel on its 100s - 1000s of processing cores. When deployed in a Quality of Service (QoS)-based system, the many-core must execute a task at a target QoS. The amount of processing required by the task for the QoS varies over the task's lifetime. Accordingly, Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) allows the many-core to deliver precise amount of processing required to meet the task QoS guarantee while conserving power. Still, a global control is necessitated to ensure that the many-core overall does not exceed its power budget.

Previously, only non-stochastic controls have been proposed for the problem of QoS-aware power budgeting in many-cores. We propose the first stochastic control for the problem, which has a computational complexity less than the non-stochastic control by a factor of O (ln n) but with equivalent performance. The proposed stochastic control can operate with 6.4x less overhead than the non-stochastic control for a 256-task workload.

References

  1. Christian Bienia, Sanjeev Kumar, Jaswinder Pal Singh, and Kai Li. 2008. The PARSEC Benchmark Suite: Characterization and Architectural Implications. In Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nathan Binkert et al. 2011. The gem5 Simulator. In SIGARCH Computer Architecture News (CAN). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Silas Boyd-Wickizer, Haibo Chen, Rong Chen, Yandong Mao, M Frans Kaashoek, Robert Morris, Aleksey Pesterev, Lex Stein, Ming Wu, Yue-hua Dai, et al. 2008. Corey: An Operating System for Many Cores. In Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Trevor E Carlson, Wim Heirman, and Lieven Eeckhout. 2011. Sniper: Exploring the Level of Abstraction for Scalable and Accurate Parallel Multi-Core Simulation. In International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Zhuo Chen and Diana Marculescu. 2015. Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Power Limited Many-core System Performance Optimization. In Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference (DATE). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dror G Feitelson and Larry Rudolph. 1998. Metrics and Benchmarking for Parallel Job Scheduling. Job Scheduling Strategies (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daniel Hackenberg, Robert Schüne, Thomas Ilsche, Daniel Molka, Joseph Schuchart, and Robin Geyer. 2015. An Energy Efficiency Feature Survey of the Intel Haswell Processor. In International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshop (IPDPSW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jürg Henkel, Andreas Herkersdorf, Lars Bauer, Thomas Wild, Michael Hübner, Ravi Kumar Pujari, Artjom Grudnitsky, Jan Heisswolf, Aurang Zaib, Benjamin Vogel, Vahid Lari, and Sebastian Kobbe. 2012. Invasive Manycore Architectures. In Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Canturk Isci, Alper Buyuktosunoglu, Chen-Yong Cher, Pradip Bose, and Margaret Martonosi. 2006. An Analysis of Efficient Multi-Core Global Power Management Policies: Maximizing Performance for a Given Power Budget. In International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sheng Li, Jung Ho Ahn, Richard D Strong, Jay B Brockman, Dean M Tullsen, and Norman P Jouppi. 2009. McPAT: An Integrated Power, Area, and Timing Modeling Framework for Multicore and Manycore Architectures. In International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kai Ma and Xiaorui Wang. 2012. PGCapping: Exploiting Power Gating for Power Capping and Core Lifetime Balancing in CMPs. In Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Prem S Mann. 2007. Introductory Statistics. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Santiago Pagani, Heba Khdr, Waqaas Munawar, Jian-Jia Chen, Muhammad Shafique, Minming Li, and Jürg Henkel. 2014. TSP: Thermal Safe Power: Efficient Power Budgeting for Many-Core Systems in Dark Silicon. In Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Anuj Pathania, Heba Khdr, Muhammad Shafique, Tulika Mitra, and Jürg Henkel. 2017. Scalable Probabilistic Power Budgeting for Many-Cores. In Design, Automation & Test in Europe (DATE). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Amir-Mohammad Rahmani, Mohammad-Hashem Haghbayan, Anil Kanduri, Awet Yemane Weldezion, Pasi Liljeberg, Juha Plosila, Axel Jantsch, and Hannu Tenhunen. 2015. Dynamic Power Management for Many-Core Platforms in the Dark Silicon Era: A Multi-Objective Control Approach. In International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amit Kumar Singh, Muhammad Shafique, Akash Kumar, and Jürg Henkel. 2013. Mapping on Multi/Many-Core Systems: Survey of Current and Emerging Trends. In Design Automation Conference (DAC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yuan H Wang. 1993. On the Number of Successes in Independent Trials. Statistica Sinica (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Andreas Weichslgartner, Deepak Gangadharan, Stefan Wildermann, Michael Glaß, and Jürgen Teich. 2014. DAARM: Design-Time Application Analysis and Run-Time Mapping for Predictable Execution in Many-Core Systems. In Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. QoS-aware stochastic power management for many-cores

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '18: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2018
      1089 pages
      ISBN:9781450357005
      DOI:10.1145/3195970

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader