skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

A Network-Based Virtual Reality Simulation Training Approach for Orthopedic Surgery

Published:22 August 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The focus of this article is on the adoption of immersive and haptic simulators for training of medical residents in a surgical process called Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plating surgery. LISS surgery is an orthopedic surgical procedure to treat fractures of the femur bone. Development of such simulators is a complex task which involves multiple systems, technologies, and human experts. Emerging Next Generation Internet technologies were used to develop the standalone on-line haptic-based simulator accessible to the students 24/7. A standalone immersive surgical simulator was also developed using HTC Vive. Expert surgeons played an important role in developing the simulator system; use cases of the target surgical processes were built using a modeling language called the engineering Enterprise Modeling Language (eEML). A detailed study presenting the comparison between the haptic-based simulator and the immersive simulator has been also presented. The outcomes of this study underscore the potential of using such simulators in surgical training.

References

  1. B. Tolsdorff, A. Pommert, K. H. Höhne, A. Petersik, B. Pflesser, U. Tiede, and R. Leuwer. 2010. Virtual reality: A new paranasal sinus surgery simulator. The Laryngoscope, 120, 2, 420--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K. S. Choi, S. Soo, and F. L. Chung. 2009. A virtual training simulator for learning cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 39, 11, 1020--1031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Echegaray, I. Herrera, I. Aguinaga, C. Buchart, and D. Borro. 2014. A brain surgery simulator. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 34, 3, 12--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Luciano, P. Banerjee, and T. DeFanti. 2009. Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator. Virtual Reality, 13, 2, 69--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Shi, Y. Xiong, X. Hua, K. Tan, and X. Pan. 2015. Key techniques of haptic related computation in virtual liver surgery. In 2015 8th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). IEEE, 355--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Yu, T. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Wang, and B. Zhang. 2013. A geometric modeling method based on OpenGL in virtual gallbladder surgery. In 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering. Atlantis Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. M. Peters, C. A. Linte, J. Moore, D. Bainbridge, D. L. Jones, and G. M. Guiraudon. 2008. Towards a medical virtual reality environment for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Virtual Reality. Springer, Berlin, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. S. Sørensen, S. V. Therkildsen, P. Makowski, J. L. Knudsen, and E. M. Pedersen. 2001. A new virtual reality approach for planning of cardiac interventions. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 22, 3, 193--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Berlage, A. Schmitgen, C. Schmitz, and A. Welz. 2001. Simulation and planning of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. In International Congress Series. Elsevier, 68--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. V. T. Le and S. Nahavandi. 2010. A haptic training environment for the heart myoblast cell injection procedure. In 11th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics 8 Vision (ICARCV). IEEE, 448--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Ren, R. V. Patel, K. A. McIsaac, G. Guiraudon, and T. M. Peters. 2008. Dynamic 3-D virtual fixtures for minimally invasive beating heart procedures. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 27, 8, 1061--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Yu, S. Zhang, P. Chiang, Y. Cai, and J. Zheng. 2010. Real-time and realistic simulation for cardiac intervention with GPU. In 2nd International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (ICCMS’10). IEEE, 68--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Azzie, J. T. Gerstle, A. Nasr, D. Lasko, J. Green, O. Henao, and A. Okrainec. 2011. Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 46, 5, 897--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. A. Seixas-Mikelus, T. Kesavadas, G. Srimathveeravalli, R. Chandrasekhar, G. E. Wilding, and K. A. Guru. 2010. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology, 76, 2, 357--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Makiyama, M. Nagasaka, T. Inuiya, K. Takanami, M. Ogata, and Y. Kubota. 2012. Development of a patient specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. International Journal of Urology, 19, 9, 829--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. P. Grantcharov, V. B. Kristiansen, J. Bendix, L. Bardram, J. Rosenberg, and P. Funch‐Jensen. 2004. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. British Journal of Surgery, 91, 2, 146--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. Aggarwal, I. Balasundaram, and A. Darzi. 2008. Training opportunities and the role of virtual reality simulation in acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills. Journal of Surgical Research, 145, 1, 80--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Torkington, S. G. Smith, B. I. Rees, and A. Darzi. 2000. The role of simulation in surgical training. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82, 2, 88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Sourin, O. Sourina, and H. T. Sen. 2000. Virtual orthopedic surgery training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20, 3, 6--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Qin, W. M. Pang, Y. P. Chui, T. T. Wong, and P. A. Heng. 2010. A novel modeling framework for multilayered soft tissue deformation in virtual orthopedic surgery. Journal of Medical Systems, 34, 3, 261--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. L. Delp and J. P. Loan. 1995. A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 25, 1, 21--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. D. Tsai, M. S. Hsieh, and S. B. Jou. 2001. Virtual reality orthopedic surgery simulator. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 31, 5, 333--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. W. Park, J. Choi, Y. Park, and K. Sun. 2011. Haptic virtual fixture for robotic cardiac catheter navigation. Artificial Organs, 35, 11, 1127--1131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery. Retrieved from https://www.abos.org/abos-surgical-skills-modules-for-pgy-1-residents.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. D. Tsai, C. S. Liu, H. Y. Liu, M. S. Hsieh, and F. C. Tsai. 2011. Virtual reality facial contouring surgery simulator based on CT transversal slices. In 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Vankipuram, K. Kahol, A. McLaren, and S. Panchanathan. 2010. A virtual reality simulator for orthopedic basic skills: A design and validation study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43, 5, 661--668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. P. Blyth, N. S. Stott, and I. A. Anderson. 2007. A simulation-based training system for hip fracture fixation for use within the hospital environment. Injury, 38, 10, 1197--1203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Bayonat, M. García, C. Mendoza, and J. M. Fernandez. 2006. Shoulder arthroscopy training system with force feedback. In International Conference on Medical Information Visualisation-BioMedical Visualisation (MedVis'06).IEEE, 71--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Petersson, K. L. Palmerius, H. Knutsson, O. Wahlstrom, B. Tillander, and M. Borga. 2008. Simulation of patient specific cervical hip fracture surgery with a volume haptic interface. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 55, 4, 1255--1265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. H. Sabri, B. Cowan, B. Kapralos, M. Porte, D. Backstein, and A. Dubrowskie. 2010. Serious games for knee replacement surgery procedure education and training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2, 3483--3488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. I. Kovler, L. Joskowicz, Y. A. Weil, A. Khoury, A. Kronman, R. Mosheiff, and J. Salavarrieta. 2015. Haptic computer-assisted patient-specific preoperative planning for orthopedic fractures surgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10, 10, 1535--1546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. D. Tsai, M. S. Hsieh, and C. H. Tsai. (2007). Bone drilling haptic interaction for orthopedic surgical simulator. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 37, 12, 1709--1718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. O. Sourina, A. Sourin, and H. T. Sen. 2000. Virtual orthopedic surgery training on personal computer. International Journal of Information Technology, 6, 1, 16--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. M. X. Kong, Z. J. Du, L. N. Sun, L. X. Fu, Z. H. Jia, and D. M. Wu. 2006. A robot-assisted orthopedic telesurgery system. In 2005 27th Annual IEEE Conference Engineering in Medicine and Biology. IEEE, 97--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. L. Rosenblum M. Macedonia. 2000. Virtual orthopedic surgery training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20, 3, 6--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. G. Burdea, V. Popescu, V. Hentz, and K. Colbert. 2000. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8, 3, 430--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. M. A. Padilla-Castaneda, E. Sotgiu, A. Frisoli, M. Bergamasco, P. Orsini, A. Martiradonna, and C. Laddaga. 2013. A virtual reality system for robotic-assisted orthopedic rehabilitation of forearm and elbow fractures. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1506--1511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Eriksson, H. Flemmer, and J. Wikander. 2005. Haptic simulation of the milling process in temporal bone operations. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 111 (2005), 133--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. D. d'Aulignac, M. C. Cavusoglu, and C. Laugier. 1999. Modeling the dynamics of the human thigh for a realistic echographic simulator with force feedback. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, 1191--1198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. T. Seth, V. Chaudhary, C. Buyea, and L. Bone. 2011. A virtual interactive navigation system for orthopedic surgical interventions. In 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, ACM, 71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. W. I. Willaert, R. Aggarwal, I. Van Herzeele, N. J. Cheshire, and F. E. Vermassen. 2012. Recent advancements in medical simulation: patient-specific virtual reality simulation. World Journal of Surgery, 36, 7, 1703--1712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. C. Karaliotas. 2011. When simulation in surgical training meets virtual reality. Hellenic Journal of Surgery, 83, 6, 303--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. J. P. Braman, R. M. Sweet, D. M. Hananel, P. M. Ludewig, and A. E. Van Heest. 2015. Development and validation of a basic arthroscopy skills simulator. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic 8 Related Surgery, 31, 1, 104--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. C. Andersen, T. N. Winding, and M. S. Vesterby. 2011. Development of simulated arthroscopic skills: A randomized trial of virtual-reality training of 21 orthopedic surgeons. Acta orthopedica, 82, 1, 90--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. K. Rose and R. Pedowitz. 2015. Fundamental arthroscopic skill differentiation with virtual reality simulation. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic 8 Related Surgery, 31, 2, 299--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. J. J. Stunt, G. M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, C. N. van Dijk, and G. J. M. Tuijthof. 2015. Validation of the arthros virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23, 11, 3436--3442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. J. Qin, W. M. Pang, Y. P. Chui, T. T. Wong, and P. A. Heng. 2010. A novel modeling framework for multilayered soft tissue deformation in virtual orthopedic surgery. Journal of Medical Systems, 34, 3, 261--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Y. Lin, X. Wang, F. Wu, X. Chen, C. Wang, and G. Shen. 2014. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 48, 122--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. NASA TLX Test. Retrieved from https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/downloads/TLX.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. A. Nahvi, M. Moghaddam, M. Arbabtafti, M. Mahvash, and B. Richardson. 2016. Virtual bone surgery using a haptic robot. International Journal of Robotics, Theory and Applications, 1, 1, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. M. Citak, M. J. Gardner, D. Kendoff, S. Tarte, C. Krettek, L. P. Nolte, and T. Hüfner. 2008. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 26, 4, 547--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. L. Assassi, C. Charbonnier, J. Schmid, P. Volino, and N. Magnenat‐Thalmann. 2009. From MRI to anatomical simulation of the hip joint. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 20, 1, 53--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Y. Jun and S. Park. 2011. Polygon-based 3D surgical planning system for hip operation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 12, 1, 157--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. D. Morris, C. Sewell, N. Blevins, F. Barbagli, and K. Salisbury. 2004. A collaborative virtual environment for the simulation of temporal bone surgery. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 319--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. B. Chebbi, D. Lazaroff, F. Bogsany, P. X. Liu, L. Ni, and M. Rossi. 2005. Design and implementation of a collaborative virtual haptic surgical training system. In IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation. IEEE, 315--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. P. V. Paiva, L. D. S. Machado, A. M. G. Valença, R. M. De Moraes, and T. V. Batista. 2016. Enhancing collaboration on a cloud-based CVE for supporting surgical education. In 2016 XVIII Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR). IEEE, 29--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. S. W. Tang, K. L. Chong, J. Qin, Y. P. Chui, S. S. M. Ho, and P. A. Heng. 2007. ECiSS: A middleware based development framework for enhancing collaboration in surgical simulation. In IEEE International Conference on Integration Technology (ICIT'07). IEEE, 15--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. C. Jay, M. Glencross, and R. Hubbold. 2007. Modeling the effects of delayed haptic and visual feedback in a collaborative virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14, 2, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. E. Acosta and A. Liu. 2007. Real-time interactions and synchronization of voxel-based collaborative virtual environments. In 2007 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. P. Youngblood, P. M. Harter, S. Srivastava, S. Moffett, W. L. Heinrichs, and P. Dev. 2008. Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams. Simulation in Healthcare, 3, 3, 146--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. B. R. A. Sales, L. S. Machado, and R. M. Moraes. 2011. Interactive collaboration for virtual reality systems related to medical education and training. Technology and Medical Sciences, 157--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. J. C. De Oliveira and N. D. Georganas. 2003. VELVET: An adaptive hybrid architecture for very large virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 6, 555--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. J. Qin, K. S. Choi, W. S. Poon, and P. A. Heng. 2009. A framework using cluster-based hybrid network architecture for collaborative virtual surgery. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 96, 3, 205--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. R. Caceres and A. Friday. 2012. Ubicomp systems at 20: Progress, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11, 1, 14--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. C. Mégard, F. Gosselin, S. Bouchigny, F. Ferlay, and F. Taha. 2009. User-centered design of a maxillo-facial surgery training platform. In 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 265--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. G. Brandt, A. Zimolong, L. Carrat, P. Merloz, H. W. Staudte, S. Lavallee, and G. Rau. 1999. CRIGOS: A compact robot for image-guided orthopedic surgery. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 3, 4, 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. J. Forsslund, E. L. Sallnas, and K. J. Palmerius. 2009. A user-centered designed FOSS implementation of bone surgery simulations. In EuroHaptics Conference, 2009 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics 2009. IEEE, 391--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. A. Jalote-Parmar and P. Badke-Schaub. 2008. Workflow integration matrix: A framework to support the development of surgical information systems. Design Studies, 29, 4, 338--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. P. Jannin. 2013. Surgical process modeling: Methods and applications. In Presentation at the 2013 Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference (NEXTMED/MMVR20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. A. Nemani, G. Sankaranarayanan, K. Roberts, L. Panait, C. Cao, and S. De. 2013. Hierarchical task analysis of hybrid rigid scope natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy procedures. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 184, 293--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. J. Cecil, M. B. R. Kumar, A. Gupta, M. Pirela-Cruz, E. Chan-Tin, and J. Yu. 2016. Development of a virtual reality based simulation environment for orthopedic surgical training. In OTM Confederated International Conferences On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. Springer, 206--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. J. Cecil, A. Gupta, and M. Pirela-Cruz. 2018. An advanced simulator for orthopedic surgical training. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 13, 2, 305--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Communication diagrams. Retrieved from http://agilemodeling.com/style/collaborationDiagram.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. J. Cecil, A. Gupta, M. Pirela-Cruz, and P. Ramanathan. 2017. A cyber training framework for orthopedic surgery. Cogent Medicine, 4, 1, 1419792.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. GENI. Retrieved from www.geni.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. FIRE. Retrieved from https://www.ict-fire.eu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. M. Berman, J. S. Chase, L. Landweber, A. Nakao, M. Ott, D. Raychaudhuri, and I. Seskar. 2014. GENI: A federated testbed for innovative network experiments. Computer Networks, 61, 5--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Software Defined Networking. Retrieved from https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/sdn-definition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. S. Wijewickrema, B. Copson, Y. Zhou, X. Ma, R. Briggs, J. Bailey, G. Kennedy, and S. O'Leary. 2017. Design and evaluation of a virtual reality simulation module for training advanced temporal bone surgery. In 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). IEEE, 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. James D. Watterson, Darren T. Beiko, James K. Kuan, and John D. Denstedt. 2002. A randomized prospective blinded study validating acquisition of ureteroscopy skills using a computer based virtual reality endourological simulator. The Journal of Urology, 168, 5, 1928--1932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Schlickum Marcus Kolga, Leif Hedman, Lars Enochsson, Ann Kjellin, and Li Felländer-Tsai. 2009. Systematic video game training in surgical novices improves performance in virtual reality endoscopic surgical simulators: A prospective randomized study. World Journal of Surgery, 33, 11, 2360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Steam VR toolkit. Retrieved from https://partner.steamgames.com/vrlicensing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. VRTK. Retrieved from https://vrtoolkit.readme.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Vive. Retrieved from https://www.vive.com/us/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. E. G. G. Verdaasdonk, J. Dankelman, J. F. Lange, and L. P. S. Stassen. 2008. Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying training on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: A randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 22, 7, 1636--1642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. N. R. Howells, H. S. Gill, A. J. Carr, A. J. Price, and J. L. Rees. 2008. Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: A randomised blinded study. Bone 8 Joint Journal, 90, 4, 494--499.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Network-Based Virtual Reality Simulation Training Approach for Orthopedic Surgery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!