Lillian Campbell
ABSTRACT
This experience report draws on a unique pedagogical context-clinical nursing simulations-to examine how student texts can mediate a classroom exchange. Focusing on 52 student handoffs, I analyze frequency of text use, correlation between text use and student talk, and the impact of a text's content on its mediating role. This methodology centers student texts and in the process, reimagines possibilities for UX pedagogy and assessment.
- F Chong (2016). The pedagogy of usability: An analysis of technical communication textbooks, anthologies, and course descriptions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 12--28.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J Swarts and S Slattery (2009). Usability testing in the writing classroom: Testing across a continuum of instrumentality. In S.K. Miller and R.L. Rodrigo Rhetorically rethinking usability: Theories, practices, methodologies. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 191--212.Google Scholar
- LA Riesenberg, J Leisch, and JM Cunningham (2010). Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. AJN: The American Journal of Nursing, 110(4), 24--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Johnson, D Jeffries, and D Nicholls, (2012). Developing a minimum data set for electronic nursing handover. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(3-4), 331--343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J Matic, PM Davidson, Y Salamonson (2011). User experience design considerations for healthcare games and applications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 184--189.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C Crossley, JR Fanfarelli, R McDaniel (2016). Article Title. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2016 IEEE International Conference, 1--8.Google Scholar
- K St. Amant (2017). Mapping the context of care: An approach to patient-centered design in international contexts. ConneXions: International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1), 109--124.Google Scholar
- WM Simons and MW Zoetewey (2016). Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces for public deliberation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 251--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N Rivers and L S Söderlund (2016). Speculative usability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1), 125--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L Cooke (2005). Eye tracking: How it works and how it relates to usability. Technical Communication, 52(4), 456--463.Google Scholar
- A Shivers-McNair (2017). 3D interviewing with researcher POV video: Bodies and knowledge in the making. Kairos: Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 21(2).Google Scholar
- F Chong (2017). Implementing usability testing in introductory technical communication service courses: Results and lessons from a local study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 196--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- JB Scott (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 381--412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- CA Reilly (2009). Bibliographic entries and usability: Teaching citation of electronic sources. In S.K. Miller and R.L. Rodrigo Rhetorically rethinking usability: Theories, practices, methodologies. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
- LK Meloncon (2017). Patient experience design: expanding usability methodologies for healthcare. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 5(2), 19--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K St. Amant (2017). The cultural context of care in international communication design: A heuristic for addressing usability in international health and medical communication. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(2), 62--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CC Gouge (2017). Improving patient discharge communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(4), 419--439.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K Smith, V Smith, M Krugman, and K Oman, (2005). Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(3), 132--138.Google Scholar
- TT Lee (2007). Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: Early stage of technology implementation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 25(5), 294--300.Google Scholar
- R Hawkins, L Bendickson, P Bendickson, L Osborne, J McPherson, L Todd, and K Bohan (2014). A pilot study evaluating the perceptions of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists toward human patient simulation. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, 82(5), 375--384.Google Scholar
- EJ Yeun, HY Bang, EN Ryoo, and EH Ha (2014). Attitudes toward simulation-based learning in nursing students: An application of Q methodology. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1062--1068.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Measuring the dynamics of remembered experience over time
A wealth of studies in the field of user experience have tried to conceptualize new measures of product quality and inquire into how the overall goodness of a product is formed on the basis of product quality perceptions. An interesting question relates ...
User experience over time: an initial framework
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA recent trend in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research addresses human needs that go beyond the instrumental, resulting in an increasing body of knowledge about how users form overall evaluative judgments on the quality of interactive products. An ...
Towards Creating a Body of Evidence-based Interactive Digital Narrative Design Knowledge: Approaches and Challenges
AltMM '17: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate RealitiesIn the context of this paper we take design knowledge as the methods applied by the creators (for example game designers in the case of games) of interactive experiences in contrast to for example the design of authoring tools or the design of game ...
Comments